Effect of Lactobacillus mucosae on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of dried brewers grain, methane production and bacterial diversity

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1562-1570

  Soriano, Alvin P ^a   Mamuad, Lovelia L ^a   Kim, Seon Ho ^a   Choi, Yeon Jae ^a   Jeong, Chang Dae ^a   Bae, Gui Seck ^a,b   Chang, Moon Baek ^a,b   Lee, Sang Suk ^a  

^a Sunchon National University   (South Korea)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Brewers grain; Culture supernatant; In vitro rumen fermentation; Lactobacillus mucosae

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LACTOBACILLUS MUCOSAE;

EID: 84908489589     PISSN: 10112367     EISSN: 19765517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14517     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Asanuma, N., M. Iwamoto, and T. Hino. 1999. Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 82:780-787.
2. Bilkova, A., H. K. Sepova, M. Bukovsky, and L. Bezakova. 2011. Antibacterial potential of Lactobacilli isolated from a lamb. Vet. Med. 56:319-324
3. Blummel, M. and K. Becker. 1997. The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughages and roughage neutral-detergent fibres as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake. Br. J. Nutr. 77:757-768.
4. Brown, D. W. and W. E. C. Moore. 1960. Distribution of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens in nature. J. Dairy Sci. 43:1570-1574.
5. Bryant, M. P. and N. Small. 1956. The anaerobic monotrichous butyric acid-producing curved rod-shaped bacteria of the rumen. J. Bacteriol. 72:16-21.
6. Chaney, A. L. and E. P. Marbach. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8:130-132.
7. Chanthakhoun, V. and M. Wanapat. 2012. The in vitro gas production and ruminal fermentation of various feeds using rumen liquor from swamp buffalo and cattle. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 7:54-60.
8. Chen, S., L. Niu, and Y. Zhang. 2010. Saccharofermentans acetigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium isolated from sludge treating brewery wastewater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60:2735-2738.
9. Cotta, M. A. and R. B. Hespell. 1986. Proteolytic activity of the ruminal bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52:51-58.
10. Enitan, A., J. Adeyemo, and S. Ogunbanwo. 2011. Influence of growth conditions and nutritionalrequirements on the production of hydrogen peroxideby lactic acid bacteria. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5:2059-2066.
11. Getachew, G., M. Blümmel, H. P. S. Makkar, and K. Becker. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72:261-281.
12. Guglielmelli, A., S. Calabrò, M. Cutrignelli, O. Gonzalez, F. Infascelli, R. Tudisco, and V. Piccolo. 2010. In vitro fermentation and methane production of fava and soy beans. Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition. EAAP Scientific Series 127. 3rd EAAP International Symposium on Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Parma, Italy. 457-460.
13. Hane, B. G., K. Jager, and H. G. Drexler. 1993. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is better suited for identification of DNA fingerprint profiles than band matching algorithms. Electrophoresis 14:967-972.
14. Hattori, K. and H. Matsui. 2008. Diversity of fumarate reducing bacteria in the bovine rumen revealed by culture dependent and independent approaches. Anaerobe 14:87-93.
15. Kamra, D. N. 2005. Rumen microbial ecosystem. Curr. Sci. 89(1).
16. Kim, S. H., L. L. Mamuad, C. D. Jeong, Y. J. Choi, S. S. Lee, J. Y. Ko, and S. S. Lee. 2013. In vitro evaluation of different feeds for their potential to generate methane and change methanogen diversity. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 26:1698-1707.
17. Krehbiel, C. R., S. R. Rust, G. Zhang, and S. E. Gilliland. 2003. Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performance response and mode of action. J. Anim. Sci. 81(14 Suppl 2):E120-E132.
18. Mamuad, L. L., S. H. Kim, A. P. Soriano, and S. Lee. 2012b. Lactobacillus mucosae 521129: A propionate-producing bacteria isolated from Korean native goat. Unpublished paper.
19. Mamuad, L. L., S. H. Kim, S. S. Lee, K. K. Cho, C. O. Jeon, and S. S. Lee. 2012a. Characterization, metabolites and gas formation of fumarate reducing bacteria isolated from Korean native goat ( Capra hircus coreanae). J. Microbiol. 50:925-931.
20. Marounek, M. and D. Dušková. 1999. Metabolism of pectin in rumen bacteria Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and Prevotella ruminicola. Lett. App. Microbiol. 29:429-433.
21. Morita, H., H. Toh, S. Fukuda, H. Horikawa, K. Oshima, T. Suzuki, M. Murakami, S. Hisamatsu, Y. Kato, T. Takizawa, H. Fukuoka, T. Yoshimura, K. Itoh, D. J. O'Sullivan, L. L. McKay, H. Ohno, J. Kikuchi, T. Masaoka, and M. Hattori. 2008. Comparative genome analysis of Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus fermentum reveal a genomic island for reuterin and cobalamin production. DNA Res. 15:151-161.
22. Muyzer, G. and K. Smalla. 1998. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73:127-141.
23. Nocek, J. E., W. P. Kautz, J. A. Z. Leedle, and J. G. Allman. 2002. Ruminal supplementation of direct-fed microbials on diurnal pH variation and in situ digestion in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85:429-433.
24. Nollet, L., L. Mbanzamihigo, D. Demeyer, and W. Verstraete. 1998. Effect of the addition of Peptostreptococcus productus ATCC 35244 on reductive acetogenesis in the ruminal ecosystem after inhibition of methanogenesis by cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus plantarum 80. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 71:49-66.
25. Nubel, U., B. Engelen, A. Felske, J. Snaidr, A. Wieshuber, R. I. Amann, W. Ludwig, and H. Backhaus. 1996. Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. J. Bacteriol. 178:5636-5643.
26. Owens, F. N. and R. Zinn. 1988. Protein metabolism of ruminants. The Ruminant Animal: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition (Ed. D. C. Church). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
27. Pereira, J. C., M. D. Carro, J. Gonzalez, M. R. Alvir, and C. A. Rodriguez. 1998. Rumen degradability and intestinal digestibility of brewers' grains as affected by origin and heat treatment and of barley rootlets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 74:107-121.
28. Roos, S., F. Karner, L. Axelsson, and H. Jonsson. 2000. Lactobacillus mucosae sp. nov., a new species with in vitro mucus-binding activity isolated from pig intestine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:1:251-258.
29. Satter, L. D. and L. L. Slyter. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 32:199-208.
30. Seo, J. K., S. Kim, M. H. Kim, S. D. Upadhaya, D. K. Kam, and J. K. Ha. 2010. Direct-fed microbials for ruminant animals. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23:1657-1667.
31. Simpson, J. M., V. J. McCracken, B. A. White, H. R. Gaskins, and R. I. Mackie. 1999. Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. J. Microbiol. Methods 36:167-179.
32. Takahashi, J. 2013. Lactic acid bacteria and mitigation of GHG emission from ruminant livestock. Lactic Acid Bacteria - R & D for Food, Health and Livestock Purposes. InTech Publishing, Vienna, Austria.
33. Valeriano, V. D., M. M. Parungao-Balolong, and D. K. Kang. 2014. In vitro evaluation of the mucin-adhesion ability and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117:485-497.
34. Wells, J. E., D. O. Krause, T. R. Callaway, and J. B. Russell. 1997. A bacteriocin-mediated antagonism by ruminal lactobacilli against Streptococcus bovis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 22:237-243.
35. Zafarian, R. and M. Manafi. 2013. Effect of garlic powder on methane production, rumen fermentation and milk production of buffaloes. Annu. Rev. Res. Biol. 3:1013-1019.
36. Zicarelli, F., S. Calabrò, M. I. Cutrignelli, F. Infascelli, R. Tudisco, F. Bovera, and V. Piccolo. 2011. In vitro fermentation characteristics of diets with different forage/concentrate ratios: comparison of rumen and faecal inocula. J. Sci. Food Agric. 91:1213-1221.