Ruminal supplementation of direct-fed microbials on diurnal pH variation and in situ digestion in dairy cattle

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 429-433

  Nocek, J E ^a   Kautz, W P ^b   Leedle, J A Z ^b   Allman, J G ^b  

^a Spruce Haven Farm and Research Center   (United States)

^b Chr Hansen's Biosystems   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct fed microbial; Ruminal pH

Indexed keywords

BOS TAURUS; ENTEROCOCCUS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; ZEA MAYS;

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; CATHETERIZATION; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DIGESTION; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLUS; MAIZE; METABOLISM; PH; RUMINANT STOMACH; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CATHETERIZATION; CATTLE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DIGESTION; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LACTOBACILLUS; PROBIOTICS; RUMEN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0036483471     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74091-5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aldrich, J. M., L. D. Muller, G. A. Varga, and L. C. Griel, Jr. 1993. Nonstructural carbohydrate and protein effects on ruminal fermentation, nutrient flow, and performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:1091-1105.
2. Cameron, M. R., T. H. Klusmeyer, G. L. Lynch, J. H. Clark, and D. R. Nelson. 1991. Effects of urea and starch on rumen fermentation, nutrient passage to the duodenum, and performance of cows. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1321-1336.
3. Chaucheyras, F., G. Fonty, G. Bertin, J. M. Salmon, and P. Gouet. 1996. Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cervisiae(Luvucell SC1), a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolism invitro. Can. J. Microbiol. 42:927-933.
4. DePeters, E. J., and S. J. Taylor. 1985. Effect of feeding corn or barley on composition of milk and diet digestibility. J. Dairy Sci. 68:2027-2032.
5. Fulton, W., T. J. Klopfenstein and R. A. Britton. 1979a. Adaptation of high-concentrate diets by beef cattle. I. Adaptation to corn and wheat diets. J. Anim. Sci. 49:775-784.
6. Fulton, W. R., T. J. Klopfenstein and R. A. Brittion. 1979b. Adaptation to high-concentrate diets by beef cattle. II. Effect of ruminal pH altering on rumen fermentation and voluntary intake of wheat diets. J. Anim. Sci. 49:785-789.
7. Kramer, C. Y. 1956. Extension of multiple range test to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12:309-310.
8. Nocek, J. E. 1988. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2051-2069.
9. Nocek, J. E. 1997. Bovine acidosis: Implications of laminitis. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1005-1028.
10. Nocek, J. E., J. G. Allman, and W. P. Kautz. 2002. Evaluation of an indwelling probe methodology and effect of grain level on diurnal pH variation in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85:422-428.
11. Russell, J. B., and D. B. Dombrowski. 1980. Effect of pH on the efficiency of growth of rumen bacteria in pure culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:604-610.
12. Russell, J. B., and D. B. Wilson. 1996. Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH? J. Dairy Sci. 79:1503-1509.
13. SAS Institute, Inc. 1996. SAS JMP Software: Statistical Discovery Software. Version 3.1.6.2. 1996. SAS Inst, Cary, NC.
14. Tukey, J. 1991. The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Sci. 6:100-116.
15. Van Kessel, J. S., and J. B. Russell. 1996. The effect of amino acid nitrogen on the energetics of ruminal bacteria and its impact on energy spilling. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1237-1243.
16. Van Soest, P. J., C. J. Sniffen, D. R. Mertens, D. G. Fox, P. H. Robinson, and U. Krishnamoorthy. 1982. A net protein system for cattle: the rumen submodel for nitrogen. Page 265 in Protein Requirements for Cattle. Oklahoma State Univ. MP109, Stillwater.