Sustainability development for supply chain management in U.S. petroleum industry by DEA environmental assessment

Energy Economics

Volumn 46, Issue , 2014, Pages 360-374

  Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki ^a   Wang, Derek ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Corporate sustainability; DEA; Environment; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHAINS; CONSUMER PROTECTION; CRUDE OIL; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; OIL SHALE; OIL TANKERS; PETROLEUM INDUSTRY; PETROLEUM REFINERIES; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS;

CORPORATE-SUSTAINABILITY; DEA; EMPIRICAL - COMPARISONS; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION; TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; GAS PRODUCTION; INNOVATION; OIL PRODUCTION; PRICE DYNAMICS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADE-OFF;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84908447205     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.022     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. American Petroleum Institute Understanding the oil and natural gas supply chains Accessed June 23, 2014. http://www.api.org/policy-and-issues/policy-items/safety/understanding-the-oil-natural-gas-supply-chains.
2. Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17(1):99-120.
3. Carter C.R., Kale R., Grimm C.M. Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transp. Res. E 2000, 36:219-228.
4. Chakravarthy B. A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Manag. Rev. 1997, 38:69-82.
5. Depart of Energy U.S. energy sector vulnerabilities to climate change and extreme weather Accessed June 23, 2014. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/07/f2/20130710-Energy-Sector-Vulnerabilities-Report.pdf.
6. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/EPAactivities/regulatory-initiatives.html.
7. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-17/drillers-say-costs-manageable-from-pending-gas-emissions-rule.html.
8. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/actions.html.
9. Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: petroleum and natural gas systems 2012 data summary Accessed June 23, 2014. http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/documents/pdf/2013/documents/SubpartW-2012-Data-Summary.pdf.
10. Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting.
11. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Pasurka C. Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls. Resour. Energy 1986, 8:167-184.
12. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovel C.A.K., Pasurka C. Multilateral productivity comparison when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1989, 71:90-98.
13. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach 1984, Pittman, Marshfield.
14. Glover F., Sueyoshi T. Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in operations research and management science. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 197:1-16.
15. Gonzáles-Benito J., Gonzáles-Benito Ó. A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2006, 15:87-102.
16. Goto M., Ootsuka A., Sueyoshi T. DEA (data envelopment analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries. Energy 2014, 66:535-549.
17. Hall J. Environmental supply-chain innovations. Greener Manag. Int. 2001, 35:105-119.
18. Harris P.G. Environmental perspectives and behavior in China: synopsis and bibliography. Environ. Behav. 2006, 38:5-21.
19. Howarth R., Ingraffea A., Engelder T. Natural gas: should fracking stop. Nature 2011, 477:271-275.
20. Ijiri Y., Sueyoshi T. Accounting essays by Professor William W. Cooper: revisiting in commemoration of his 95th birthday. ABACUS 2010, 46:464-505.
21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change http://ipcc.ch/index.htm.
22. Jacobs B.W., Singhal V.R., Subramanian R. An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. J. Oper. Manag. 2010, 28:430-441.
23. Jennings P.D., Zandbergen P.A. Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20:1015-1052.
24. Lai K.H., Wong C.W.Y., Cheng T.C.E. Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management. Comput. Ind. 2006, 57:93-98.
25. Murphy J., Gouldson A. Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernization. Geoforum 2000, 31:33-44.
26. National Association of Convenience Stores NACS retail fuels report http://www.nacsonline.com/YourBusiness/FuelsReports/GasPrices_2012/Pages/WhoSellsGas.aspx.
27. NYSE Energy Index http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/nyeid_components.shtml.
28. Paloviita A., Luoma-aho V. Recognizing definitive stakeholders in corporate environmental management. Manag. Res. Rev. 2010, 33:306-316.
29. Porter M., van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9:97-118.
30. Revell A. The ecological modernisation of SMEs in the UK's construction industry. Geoforum 2007, 38:114-126.
31. Rivera J. Institutional pressures and voluntary environmental behavior in developing countries: evidence from the Costa Rican hotel industry. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2004, 17:779-797.
32. Ross A., Droge C. An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling. J. Oper. Manag. 2002, 20:19-32.
33. Ross A., Droge C. An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems. J. Oper. Manag. 2004, 21:673-688.
34. Russo M.V., Fouts P.A. A Resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 1997, 40:534-559.
35. Sarkis J., Gonzalez-Torre P., Adenso-Diaz B. Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J. Oper. Manag. 2010, 28:163-176.
36. Simpson D. Use of supply relationships to recycle secondary materials. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010, 48:227-249.
37. Singhal K., Singhal J. Opportunities for developing the science of operations and supply chain management. J. Oper. Manag. 2012, 30:245-252.
38. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Can environmental investment and expenditure enhance financial performance of US electric utility firms under the clean air act amendment of 1990?. Energy Policy 2009, 37:4819-4826.
39. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Measurement of a linkage among environmental, operational and financial performance in Japanese manufacturing firms: a use of data envelopment analysis with strong complementary slackness condition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 207:1742-1753.
40. 2 emission control?: examination by data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 2010, 38:5902-5911.
41. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Operational synergy in the electric utility industry under the influence of US deregulation policy: a linkage to financial performance and corporate value. Energy Policy 2011, 39:699-713.
42. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation. Energy Econ. 2011, 33:195208.
43. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. A combined use of DEA (data envelopment analysis) with strong complementary slackness condition and DEA-DA (discriminant analysis). Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24:1051-1056.
44. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 216:668-678.
45. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants. Energy Policy 2012, 41:422-432.
46. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: a combined use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and DEA-discriminant analysis (DA). Energy Econ. 2012, 34:634-644.
47. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale under natural and managerial disposability: strategy, efficiency and competitiveness of petroleum firms. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:645-662.
48. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Environmental assessment by DEA radial measurement: U.S. coal-fired power plants in ISO (independent system operator) and RTO (regional transmission organization). Energy Econ. 2012, 34:663-676.
49. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:686-699.
50. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:700-713.
51. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale, damages of scale, marginal rate of transformation and rate of substitution in DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:905-917.
52. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale with strong complementary slackness conditions in DEA environmental assessment: Japanese corporate effort on environmental protection. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:1422-1434.
53. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:1854-1863.
54. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale on U.S. fossil fuel power plants: radial and non-radial approaches for DEA environment assessment. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:2240-2259.
55. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: an impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants. OMEGA 2013, 41:164-175.
56. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. A use of DEA-DA to measure importance of R&D expenditure in Japanese information technology industry. Decis. Support. Syst. 2013, 54:941-952.
57. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ. 2013, 40:130-145.
58. 2 of industrial nations. Energy Econ. 2013, 40:370-382.
59. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment: a comparative study between Japanese chemical and pharmaceutical firms. Appl. Energy 2014, 115:502-513.
60. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Investment strategy for sustainable society by development of regional economies and prevention of industrial pollutions in Japanese manufacturing Sectors. Energy Econ. 2014, 42:299-312.
61. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: a comparative study by data envelopment analysis. Energy Econ. 2014, 42:271-288.
62. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Environmental assessment for corporate sustainability by resource utilization and technology innovation: DEA radial measurement on Japanese industrial sectors. Energy Econ. 2014, 46:295-307.
63. Sueyoshi T., Wang D. Radial and non-radial approaches for environmental assessment by data envelopment analysis: corporate sustainability and effective investment for technology innovation. Energy Econ. 2014, 45:537-551.
64. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Shang J. Core business concentration vs. corporate diversification in the US electric utility industry: synergy and deregulation effects. Energy Policy 2009, 37:4583-4594.
65. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Ueno T. Performance analysis of U.S. coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1675-1688.
66. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Snell M.A. DEA environmental assessment: measurement of damages to scale with unified efficiency under managerial disposability or environmental efficiency. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37:7300-7314.
67. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Sugiyama M. DEA window analysis for environmental assessment in a dynamic time shift: performance assessment of U.S. coal-fired power plants. Energy Econ. 2013, 40:845-857.
68. Tate W.L., Ellram L.M., Kirchoff J.F. Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2010, 46:19-44.
69. Theyel G. Customer and supplier relations for environmental performance. Greener Manag. Int. 2001, 35:61-69.
70. Vachon S. Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45:4357-4379.
71. Vachon S., Klassen R.D. Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2006, 26(7):795-821.
72. Walton S.V., Handfield R.B., Melnyk S.A. The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. J. Supply Chain Manag. 1998, 34:2-11.
73. Wang D., Li S., Sueyoshi T. DEA environmental assessment on U.S. industrial sectors: investment for improvement in operational and environmental performance to attain corporate sustainability. Energy Econ. 2014, 45:254-267.
74. Watanabe M., Tanaka K. Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry: a directional distance approach. Energy Policy 2007, 35:6323-6331.
75. Wong C.W.Y., Lai K.H., Cheng T.C.E. Complementarities and alignment of information systems management and supply chain management. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 2009, 1:156-171.
76. Wuyts S., Stremersch S., Van Den Bulte C., Franses P.H. Vertical marketing systems for complex products: a triadic perspective. J. Mark. Res. 2004, 41:479-487.
77. Yang H., Pollitt M. The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants. Energy Policy 2010, 38:4440-4444.
78. Yang J., Wang J., Wong C.W.Y., Lai K.H. Relational stability and alliance performance in supply chain. Omega 2008, 36:600-608.
79. Young Ernst U.S. oil and gas reserves study Accessed June 23, 2014. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/US_oil_and_gas_reserves_study_2013/$FILE/US_oil_and_gas_reserves_study_2013_DW0267.pdf.