DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: Theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions

Energy Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 700-713

  Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki ^a   Goto, Mika ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Energy; Environmental assessment

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVE MODELS; BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES; BUSINESS SCHOOLS; CORPORATE STRATEGIES; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA); DESIRABLE OUTPUTS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; INPUT VECTOR; MULTIPLE PROJECTIONS; MULTIPLE REFERENCES; PRIOR INFORMATION;

ECONOMICS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INDUSTRY; MANAGERS; VECTORS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; MODELING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; THEORETICAL STUDY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84859701769     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bevilacqua M., Braglia M. Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. J. Clean. Prod. 2002, 2002:85-92.
2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Wei Q.L., Huang Z.M. Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 1989, 20:1099-1118.
3. Cooper W.W., Huang Z., Li S., Lelas V., Sullivan D.W. Survey of mathematical programming models in air pollution management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1996, 96:1-35.
4. Dyson R., Glover F., Ijiri Y., Whinston A., Sueyoshi T. New concepts, methodology and algorithm for business education and research in the 21st century. Decis. Support. Syst. 2010, 48:427-429.
5. Emrouznejad A., Parker B.R., Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 2008, 42:151-157.
6. Glover F., Sueyoshi T. Contributions of Professor William W, Cooper in operations research and management science. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 197:1-16.
7. Ijiri, Y., Sueyoshi, T. 2010. Revisiting accounting essays by William W. Cooper: In commemorating his 95th birthday" ABACUS: A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Stud. 46, 464-505.
8. Korhonen P.J., Luptacik M. Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 2004:437-446.
9. Krivonozhko V.E., Forsund F.R. Returns to scale properties in DEA models: the fundamental role of interior point. Momorandam No. 15/2009 2009, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Available from. http://www.sv.uio.no/econ/forskning/publikasjoner/memorandum/pdf-filer/2009/Memo-15-2009.pdf.
10. Kumar S. Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: a global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 56:280-293.
11. Palmer K.W., Oates W.E., Portney P.R. Tightening environmental standards- The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9:119-132.
12. Pasurka C.A. Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Econ. 2006, 28:26-43.
13. Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Reig-Martínez E., Hernández-Sancho F. Directional distance functions and environmental regulation. Resour. Energy Econ. 2005, 27:131-142.
14. Porter M.E., van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9:97-118.
15. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Measurement of a linkage among environmental, operational and financial performance in Japanese manufacturing firms: a use of data envelopment analysis with strong complementary slackness condition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 207:1742-1753.
16. 2 emission control?: Examination by data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 2010, 38:5902-5911.
17. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation. Energy Econ. 2011, 33:195-208.
18. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 210:684-693.
19. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Measurement of returns to scale and damages to scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: how to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs?. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 211:76-89.
20. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. A combined use of DEA (data envelopment analysis) with strong complementary slackness condition and DEA-DA (discriminant analysis). Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24:1051-1056.
21. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 216:668-678.
22. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M. 2012b. Efficiency-based ranking assessment for electric power industry: A combined use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and DEA-discriminant analysis (DA). Energy Econ. (forthcoming).
23. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., 2012c. Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants. OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science. (forthcoming).
24. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., 2012d. Returns to scale and damages to scale under natural and managerial disposability: strategy, efficiency and competitiveness of petroleum firms. Energy Econ. (forthcoming).
25. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., 2012e. Environmental assessment by DEA radial measurement: U.S. coal-fired power plants in ISO (Independent System Operator) and RTO (Regional Transmission Organization). Energy Econ. (forthcoming).
26. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., 2012f. Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Econ. (forthcoming).
27. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., 2012g. DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants. Energy Policy. 41, 422-432.
28. Sueyoshi T., Sekitani K. Measurement of returns to scale by a non-radial DEA model: a range-adjusted measure model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 176:1918-1946.
29. Sueyoshi T., Sekitani K. The measurement of returns to scale under a simultaneous occurrence of multiple solutions in a reference set and a supporting hyperplane. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 181:549-570.
30. Sueyoshi T., Sekitani K. An occurrence of multiple projections in DEA-based measurement of technical efficiency: theoretical comparison among DEA models from desirable properties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 196:764-794.
31. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Ueno T. Performance analysis of U.S. coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1675-1688.
32. Thompson R.G., Singleton F.D., Thrall R.M., Smith B.A. Comparative site evaluation for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interface 1986, 16:35-49.
33. Triantis K., Otis P. Dominance-based measurement of productive and environmental performance for manufacturing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 154:447-464.
34. Zaim O. Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 48:37-47.
35. Zhou P., Ang B.W. Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy 2008, 36:2911-2916.
36. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 189:1-18.
37. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Han J.Y. Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:194-201.