DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries

Energy

Volumn 66, Issue , 2014, Pages 535-549

  Goto, Mika ^a   Otsuka, Akihiro ^a   Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki ^b  

^a CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY   (Japan)

^b NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

DEA; Efficiency; Environmental assessment; Technology innovation

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRY; INVESTMENTS; MANAGERS; MANUFACTURE; TECHNOLOGY; AIR POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; GAS EMISSIONS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE; DEA; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION; JAPANESE MANUFACTURING; OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES; TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES;

ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; DATA ACQUISITION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; REGIONAL ECONOMY; REGIONAL PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WASTE DISPOSAL; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INVESTMENT; MANUFACTURING; POLLUTION CONTROL; REGIONAL PATTERN; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

JAPAN;

EID: 84896389913     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.020     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Energy while paper 2012, [in Japanese]. http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/topics/hakusho/2012energyhtml/2-1-1.html.
2. Greenhouse gas inventory office of Japan 2013, [in Japanese]. http://www.jccca.org/chart/chart/04_04.html.
3. Porter M.E., van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. JEcon Perspect 1995, 9:97-118.
4. Bozoglu M., Ceyhan V. Energy conversion efficiency of trout and sea bass production in the Black Sea, Turkey. Energy 2009, 34:199-204.
5. Lee W.-S. Benchmarking the energy performance for cooling purposes in building using a novel index-total performance of energy for cooling purposes. Energy 2010, 35:50-54.
6. Vaninsky A. Prospective national and regional environmental performance: boundary estimations using a combined data envelopment-stochastic frontier analysis approach. Energy 2010, 35:3657-3665.
7. Yadav V.K., Padhy N.P., Gupta H.O. Amicro level study of an Indian electric utility for efficiency enhancement. Energy 2010, 35:4053-4063.
8. Lee W.-S., Kung C.-K. Using climate classification to evaluate building energy performance. Energy 2011, 36:1797-1801.
9. Fallahi A., Ebrahimi R., Ghaderi S.F. Measuring efficiency and productivity change in power electric generation management companies by using data envelopment analysis: a case study. Energy 2011, 36:6398-6405.
10. Macek K., Marik K. Amethodology for quantitative comparison of control solutions and its application to HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) systems. Energy 2012, 44:117-125.
11. Lin B., Liu X. Dilemmas between economic development and energy conservation: energy rebound effect in China. Energy 2012, 45:867-873.
12. Olanrewaju O.A., Jimoh A.A., Kholopane P.A. Integrated IDA-ANN-DEA for assessment and optimization of energy consumption in industrial sectors. Energy 2012, 46:629-635.
13. Zhou G., Chung W., Zhang X. Astudy of carbon dioxide emissions performance of China's transport sector. Energy 2013, 50:302-314.
14. 2 emission by improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber production using DEA approach. Energy 2013, 55:676-682.
15. Khoshnevisan B., Rafiee S., Omid M., Mousazadeh H. Applying data envelopment analysis approach to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG (greenhouse gas) emission of wheat production. Energy 2013, 58:588-593.
16. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Acomparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 2013, 40:130-145.
17. Sueyoshi T., Goto T. Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Econ 2012, 34:686-699.
18. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment. Eur J Oper Res 2011, 210:684-693.
19. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry. Eur J Oper Res 2012, 216:668-678.
20. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions. Energy Econ 2012, 34:700-713.
21. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale, damages of scale, marginal rate of transformation and rate of substitution in DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 2012, 34:905-917.
22. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale with strong complementary slackness conditions in DEA environmental assessment: Japanese corporate effort on environmental protection. Energy Econ 2012, 34:1422-1434.
23. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models. Energy Econ 2012, 34:1854-1863.
24. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale on U.S. fossil fuel power plants: radial and non-radial approaches for DEA environment assessment. Energy Econ 2012, 34:2240-2259.
25. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: an impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants. OMEGA 2013, 41:164-175.
26. Otsuka A., Goto M., Sueyoshi T. Industrial agglomeration effects in Japan: productive efficiency, market access and public fiscal transfer. Papers Reg Sci 2010, 89:819-839.
27. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Ueno T. Performance analysis of U.S. coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1675-1688.
28. 2 of industrial nations. Energy Econ 2013, 40:370-382.
29. Lozano S., Gutierrez E. Non-parametric frontier approach to modeling the relationship among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emission. Ecol Econ 2008, 66:687-699.
30. Thakur T., Deshmukh S.G., Kaushik S.C. Efficiency evaluation of the state owned electric utilities in India. Energy Policy 2006, 34:2788-2804.
31. Zhang B., Bi J., Fan Z., Yaun Z., Ge J. Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis. Ecol Econ 2008, 68:306-316.
32. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Han J.P. Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Econ 2010, 32:194-201.
33. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Sugiyama M. DEA window analysis for environmental assessment in a dynamic time shift: performance assessment of U.S. coal-fired power plants. Energy Econ 2013, 40:845-857.
34. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment: a comparative study between Japanese chemical and pharmaceutical firms. Applied Energy 2014, 115:502-513.