Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards

Engineering Structures

Volumn 78, Issue , 2014, Pages 154-166

  Kameshwar, Sabarethinam ^a   Padgett, Jamie E ^a  

^a Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Hurricane; Metamodel; Multi hazard; Risk

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; CONCRETE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; EARTHQUAKES; GEOMETRY; HAZARDS; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; HURRICANES; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; RISKS;

ANNUAL PROBABILITIES; ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE; COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT; EXPOSURE CONDITIONS; FRAGILITY FUNCTION; META MODEL; MULTI-HAZARDS; RISK-BASED DESIGN;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

BRIDGE; DAMAGE; DESIGN; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HURRICANE EVENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84908384206     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: 18737323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Smith K., Petley D. Environmental hazards: assessing risk & reducing disaster 2009, Routledge. 5th ed.
2. AASHTO. LRFD bridge design specifications; 2012.
3. Ettouney M.M., Alampalli S., Agrawal A.K. Theory of multihazards for bridge structures. Bridge Struct 2005, 1:281-291.
4. Li Y., Ahuja A., Padgett J.E. Review of methods to assess, design for, and mitigate multiple hazards. J Perform Constr Facil 2012, 26:104-117.
5. Pearce H.T., Wen Y. Stochastic combination of load effects. J Struct Eng 1984, 110:1613-1629.
6. Rackwitz R., Fiessler B. Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 1978, 9:489-494.
7. Ghosn M. Load combination factors for extreme events. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2005, 11:389-397.
8. Liang Z., Lee G.C. Towards multiple hazard resilient bridges: a methodology for modeling frequent and infrequent time-varying loads part I, comprehensive reliability and partial failure probabilities. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2012, 11:293-301.
9. Liang Z., Lee G.C. Towards multiple hazard resilient bridges: a methodology for modeling frequent and infrequent time-varying loads part ii, examples for live and earthquake load effects. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2012, 11:303-311.
10. Decò A., Frangopol D.M. Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards. J Risk Res 2011, 14:1057-1089.
11. McCullough M., Kareem A. A framework for performance-based engineering in multi-hazard coastal environments. Structures congress 2011 2011, 1961-1972. ASCE.
12. Asprone D., Jalayer F., Prota A., Manfredi G. Proposal of a probabilistic model for multi-hazard risk assessment of structures in seismic zones subjected to blast for the limit state of collapse. Struct Saf 2010, 32:25-34.
13. Li Y., Ellingwood B. Framework for multihazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction. J Struct Eng 2009, 135:159-168.
14. Li Y., van de Lindt J.W. Loss-based formulation for multiple hazards with application to residential buildings. Eng Struct 2012, 38:123-133.
15. Yin Y.-J., Li Y. Probabilistic loss assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to combined seismic and snow loads. Eng Struct 2011, 33:380-390.
16. Kafali C. System performance under multihazard environment [PhD Thesis]. Cornell University; 2008.
17. Arnold CD. Multi-failure mode risk assessment of the houston/galveston bridge system to hurricane threats [Masters Thesis]. Rice University; 2012.
18. Yim SC. Modeling and simulation of tsunami and storm surge hydrodynamic loads on coastal bridge structures. In: Proceedings of the 21st US-Japan bridge engineering workshop; 2005. p. 3-5.
19. Ataei N., Padgett J. Probabilistic modeling of bridge deck unseating during hurricane events. J Bridge Eng 2013, 18:275-286.
20. Simpson T.W., Poplinski J., Koch P.N., Allen J.K. Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 2001, 17:129-150.
21. Seo J., Linzell D.G. Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment. Eng Struct 2012, 34:21-32.
22. Park J., Towashiraporn P. Rapid seismic damage assessment of railway bridges using the response-surface statistical model. Struct Saf 2014, 47:1-12.
23. Ghosh J., Padgett J.E., Dueñas-Osorio L. Surrogate modeling and failure surface visualization for efficient seismic vulnerability assessment of highway bridges. Probab Eng Mech 2013, 34:189-199.
24. Jin R., Chen W., Simpson T.W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidisc Optim 2001, 23:1-13.
25. Dukes J. Application of bridge-specific fragility analysis in the seismic design process of bridges in California [PhD Thesis]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2013.
26. Ellingwood B.R., Kinali K. Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Struct Saf 2009, 31:179-187.
27. Okeil A., Cai C. Survey of short- and medium-span bridge damage induced by hurricane Katrina. J Bridge Eng 2008, 13:377-387.
28. Robertson I, Yim S, Riggs H, Young Y. Coastal bridge performance during hurricane katrina. In: 3rd International conference on structural engineering, mechanics and computation. Cape Town, South Africa; 2007.
29. Stearns M., Padgett J.E. Impact of 2008 hurricane ike on bridge infrastructure in the houston/galveston region. J Perform Constr Facil 2012, 26:441-452.
30. Padgett J.E., Nielson B.G., DesRoches R. Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthq End Struct Dyn 2008, 37:711-725.
31. Bradley B.A., Dhakal R.P., Cubrinovski M., Mander J.B., MacRae G.A. Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Earthq End Struct Dyn 2007, 36:2211-2225.
32. Jelesnianski CP, Chen J, Shaffer WA. Slosh: Sea, lake, and overland surges from hurricanes. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service; 1992.
33. Luettich RA, Westerink JJ, Scheffner NW. Adcirc: an advanced three-dimensional circulation model for shelves, coasts and estuaries. Technical Report 1, Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000; 1991.
34. Booij N, Holthuijsen L, Ris R. The "swan" wave model for shallow water. In: Coastal engineering proceedings, Orlando, Florida, United States; 1996. p. 668-76.
35. Niedoroda A.W., Resio D.T., Toro G.R., Divoky D., Das H.S., Reed C.W. Analysis of the coastal mississippi storm surge hazard. Ocean Eng 2010, 37:82-90.
36. Scheffner NW, Carson FC. Coast of south Carolina storm surge study. Vicksburg: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory; 2001.
37. Lin N., Emanuel K.A., Smith J.A., Vanmarcke E. Risk assessment of hurricane storm surge for New York city. J Geophys Res: Atmos 2010, 115:D18121.
38. FHWA. Tidal hydrology, hydraulics, and scour at bridges. HEC-25. 1st ed.; 2004.
39. Needham H.F., Keim B.D. A storm surge database for the us gulf coast. Int J Climatol 2012, 32:2108-2123.
40. AASHTO. Guide specifications for bridges vulnerable to coastal storms; 2008.
41. USACE. Shore protection manual, 2 vols. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC; 1984.
42. Rattanapitikon W., Shibayama T. Estimation of shallow water representative wave heights. Coast Eng J 2007, 49:291-310.
43. Elfrink B., Hanes D.M., Ruessink B.G. Parameterization and simulation of near bed orbital velocities under irregular waves in shallow water. Coast Eng 2006, 53:915-927.
44. Peterka J., Shahid S. Design gust wind speeds in the united states. J Struct Eng 1998, 124:207-214.
45. Fernandez JA, Rix GJ. Seismic hazard analysis and probabilistic ground motions in the upper mississippi embayment. In: Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV Sacramento, California, United States; 2008. p. 1-10.
46. Wen Y., Wu C. Uniform hazard ground motions for mid-America cities. Earthq Spectra 2001, 17:359-384.
47. Ataei N., Padgett J. Influential fluid-structure interaction modeling parameters on the response of bridges vulnerable to coastal storms. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2014, 1-13.
48. Ataei N., Stearns M., Padgett J.E. Response sensitivity for probabilistic damage assessment of coastal bridges under surge and wave loading. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2010, 2202:93-101.
49. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL. Opensees command language manual; 2006.
50. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979, 21:239-245.
51. Niederreiter H. Random number generation and quasi-monte carlo methods: SIAM; 1992.
52. Koehler J., Owen A. Computer experiments. Handb Stat 1996, 13:261-308.
53. Jekabsons G. Adaptive basis function construction: an approach for adaptive building of sparse polynomial regression models. In: Zhang Y, editor. Mach learn; 2010. p. 127-55.
54. Friedman J.H. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 1991, 19:1-67.
55. Hardy R.L. Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. J Geophys Res 1971, 76:1905-1915.
56. Whitney A.W. A direct method of nonparametric measurement selection. IEEE Trans Comput 1971, 100:1100-1103.
57. Buhmann M.D. Radial basis functions: theory and implementations 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York.
58. Hosmer D., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression 1989, John Wiley and Sons.
59. Steinwart I., Christmann A. Support vector machines 2008, Springer.
60. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods 2000, Cambridge University Press.
61. Pavlov YL. Random forests: VSP; 2000.
62. Rokach L. Data mining with decision trees: Theory and applications: World Scientific; 2007.
63. Kohavi R., Provost F. Glossary of terms. Mach Learn 1998, 30:271-274.
64. Kiureghian A.D. Non-ergodicity and peer's framework formula. Earthq End Struct Dyn 2005, 34:1643-1652.
65. Petersen MD, Frankel AD, Harmsen SC, Mueller CS, Haller KM, Wheeler RL, et al. Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps; 2008.
66. Wen Y.K., Wu C.L. Uniform hazard ground motions for mid-America cities. Earthq Spectra 2001, 17:359-384.
67. Ellingwood B.R., Celik O.C., Kinali K. Fragility assessment of building structural systems in mid-America. Earthq End Struct Dyn 2007, 36:1935-1952.
68. Nielson BG. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones [PhD Thesis]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2005.
69. Muthukumar S., DesRoches R. A hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation. Earthq End Struct Dyn 2006, 35:811-828.
70. Mackie KR, Wong J-M, Stojadinović B. Integrated probabilistic performance-based evaluation of benchmark reinforced concrete bridges. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; 2008.
71. Weseman W. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation's bridges 1995, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, USA.
72. Ataei N. Vulnerability assessment of coastal bridges subjected to hurricane events [PhD Thesis]. Houston: Rice University; 2013.
73. Padgett J.E., DesRoches R. Bridge functionality relationships for improved seismic risk assessment of transportation networks. Earthq Spectra 2007, 23:115-130.
74. DesRoches R. Hurricane katrina: performance of transportation systems/edited by reginald desroches: [Reston, Va.]: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2006.