Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment

Engineering Structures

Volumn 34, Issue , 2012, Pages 21-32

  Seo, Junwon ^a   Linzell, Daniel G ^b  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

^b The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridges; Curved; Earthquake; Monte Carlo simulation; Response Surface Metamodels; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS RESULTS; BRIDGE STRUCTURES; BRIDGE VULNERABILITY; CURVED; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; FRAGILITY CURVES; I-GIRDERS; MARYLAND; META MODEL; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; NEW YORK; PENNSYLVANIA; RADIAL DEFORMATION; RESPONSE SURFACE; SEISMIC LOAD; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; SEISMIC ZONES; URBAN REGIONS; VULNERABILITY;

BRIDGE COMPONENTS; BRIDGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

STEEL BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC ZONE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEEL STRUCTURE; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 80055025854     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Murachi Y, Orikowski MJ, Dong X, Shinozuka Y. Fragility analysis of transportation networks. Smart Structures and Material. San Diego (CA); 2003.
2. Shinozuka M., Feng Maria Q., Kim H.K., Kim S.H. Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2000, 126(12):1287-1296.
3. Choi E., DesRoches R., Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structure 2004, 26(2):187-199.
4. Padgett J.E., DesRoches R. Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008, 37(8):1157-1174.
5. Nielson B.G., DesRoches R. Analytical fragility curves for typical highway bridge classes in the Central and Southeastern United States. Earthquake Spectra 2007, 23(3):615-633.
6. Nielson B.G., DesRoches R. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007, 36:823-839.
7. ATC. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Report No. ATC-13, Applied Technology Council, 1985.
8. Basoz N, Kiremidjian, Anne S. Evaluation of bridge damage data from the Loma Prieta and Northridge (CA) earthquakes. Report No. MCEER-98-0004, MCEER; 1997.
9. Shinozuka M., Feng M.Q., Lee J., Naganuma T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2000, 126(12):1224-1231.
10. Wu C.F.J., Hamada M. Experiments-planning, analysis and parameter design optimization 2000, John Wiley & Sons.
11. de Felice G., Giannini R. An efficient approach for seismic fragility assessment with application to old reinforced concrete bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2010, 14(2):231-251.
12. Rossetto T, Elnashai AS. A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. In: the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1006. Vancouver (BC); 2004.
13. Park J., Towashiraporn P., Craig J., Goodno B. Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures. Engineering Structures 2009, 31(1):125-137.
14. Dueñas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ. Rapid regional response simulation of 3-D prototype structures for fragility characterization. In: the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1499. Vancouver (BC); 2004.
15. Franchin P., Lupoi A., Pinto P.E. Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete structures using a response surface approach. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003, 7(NSI):45-77.
16. FHWA. National bridge inventory data website, 2008 [accessed 20.08.08]. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov.
17. Davidson J.S., Abdalla R.S., Madhavan M. Design and construction of modern curved bridges. Report No. FHWA/CA/OR 2002, University Transportation Center for Alabama, The University of Alabama.
18. Brockenbrough R.L. Distribution factors for curved I-girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 1986, 112(10):2200-2215.
19. Chang C.J., White D.W. An assessment of modeling strategies for composite curved steel I-girder bridges. Engineering Structures 2008, 30(11):2991-3002.
20. Kim W.S., Laman J.A., Linzell D.G. Live load radial moment distribution for horizontally curved bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering 2007, 12(6):727-736.
21. Abdel-Salam M.N. Seismic response of curved steel box girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 1988, 114(12):2790-2800.
22. Cundy A.L., Hemez F.M., Inman D.J., Park G. Use of response surface metamodels for damage identification of a simple nonlinear system. Key Engineering Materials 2003, 245-246:167-174.
23. Rix GJ, Fernandez-Leon JA. Synthetic ground motions for Memphis (TN). 2004 [accessed 05.06.08]. http://www.ce.gatech.edu/research/mae_ground_motion.
24. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL, et al. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Version 1.7.3; 2008.
25. FEMA. HAZUS-MH MR1: Technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Vol. Earthquake Mode. Washington, DC; 2003.
26. Hwang H., Jernigan J.B., Lin Y.W. Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems. Journal of Bridge Engineering 2000, 5(4):322-330.
27. Mander JB, Kim DK, Chen SS, Premus GJ. Response of steel bridge bearings to the reversed cyclic loading. Report No. NCEER 96-0014. NCEER; 1996.
28. Azizinamini A, Pavel R, Lotfi HR. Effect of cross bracing on seismic performance of steel I-girder bridges. In: Proceedings of Structures Congress XV: Building to Last, SEI-ASCE; 1996.
29. Montgomery D.C. Design and analysis of experiments 1997, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
30. SAS Institute Inc. JMP statistics and graphics Guide - Version 5.1.2. Cary, NC; 2008.
31. Seo JW. Seismic vulnerability assessment of a family of horizontally curved steel bridges using response surface metamodels. Ph.D. Dissertation. Pennsylvania State University; 2009.
32. Engelund WC, Stanley DO, Lepsch RA, McMillin MM, Unal R. Aerodynamic configuration design using response surface methodology analysis. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Aircraft Design, Systems, and Operations Meeting, Monterey, CA; 1993.