Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 711-725

  Padgett, Jamie E ^a   Nielson, Bryant G ^b   DesRoches, Reginald ^c  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridges; Fragility; Intensity measure; Seismic

Indexed keywords

HIGHWAY BRIDGES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY;

FRAGILITY; INTENSITY MEASURE; SEISMIC DEMAND;

SEISMOLOGY;

BRIDGE; GROUND MOTION; MODELING; PEAK ACCELERATION; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC VELOCITY;

EID: 42049111156     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.782     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bassurro P, Carballo JE. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998; 14:469-500.
2. ATC. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. ATC-13. Applied Technology Council, 1985.
3. FEMA. HAZUS 97: Technical Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
4. FEMA. Earthquake model. HAZUS-MH MRI: Technical Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2003.
5. Shome N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of non-linear structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1999.
6. Baker J, Cornell AC. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1193-1217.
7. Luco N, Cornell. AC. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23:357-392.
8. Mackie K, Stojadinovic B. Fragility curves for reinforced concrete highway overpass bridges. Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
9. Nielson BG, DesRoches R. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:823-839.
10. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim H, Uzawa T, Ueda T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. MCEER-03-0002, MCEER, 2003.
11. Mackie K, Stojadinovic B. Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges. PEER 312. 2003.
12. Nielson BG. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2005.
13. Cornell AC, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128:526-532.
14. Giovenale P, Cornell AC, Esteva L. Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:951-979.
15. Mackie K, Stojadinovic B. Probabilistic seismic demand model for California bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering 2001; 6:468-480.
16. Hines W, Montgomery D, Goldsman D, Borror C. Probability and Statistics in Engineering. Wiley: New York, 2003.
17. Nielson BG, DesRoches R. Influence of modeling assumptions on the seismic response of multi-span simply supported steel girder bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures 2006; 28:1083-1092.
18. Padgett J, DesRoches R. Sensitivity of response and fragility to parameter uncertainty. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007; 133(12):1-9.
19. McKenna F, Feneves GL. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Version 1.6.2. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2005.
20. Rix GJ, Fernandez-Leon JA. Synthetic Ground Motions for Memphis, TN. 2 July 2004. Available from: http://www.ce.gatech.edu/research/ mae_ground_motion (cited 2 July 2004).
21. Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B. Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making. 2005/12. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2005.
22. Padgett J. Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted bridges using probabilistic methods. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007.
23. Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures 2004; 26:187-199.
24. FHWA. National Bridge Inventory Data. FHWA, 2002 (cited December 2003).