Techno-economic and environmental assessment of an olive stone based biorefinery

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 92, Issue , 2014, Pages 145-150

  Hernández, Valentina ^a,c   Romero García, Juan M ^b   Dávila, Javier A ^a,c   Castro, Eulogio ^b   Cardona, Carlos A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^c Laboratorio de Equilibrios Y Cinéticas Enzimáticas   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Biorefinery; Ethanol; Furfural; Olive stone; PHB; Xylitol

Indexed keywords

FURFURAL;

BIOREFINERIES; OLIVE STONES; PHB; TECHNO-ECONOMICS; XYLITOL;

ETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; FURFURAL; LIGNOCELLULOSE; OLIVE STONE; POLY(3 HYDROXYBUTYRIC ACID); SUGAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XYLITOL;

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ETHANOL; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY;

ARTICLE; BIOENERGY; BIOREFINERY; COMBUSTION; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EXTRACTION; HYDROLYSIS; OIL INDUSTRY; SIMULATION;

EID: 84908377763     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: 18790658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Agirrezabal-Telleria I, Gandarias I, Arias PL. Production of furfural from pentosan-rich biomass: analysis of process parameters during simultaneous furfural stripping. Bioresour Technol 2013;143:258-64.
2. Ahmed II, Gupta AK. Sugarcane bagasse gasification: global reaction mechanism of syngas evolution. Appl Energy 2012;91:75-81.
3. Balat M, Balat M, Kirtay E, Balat H. Main routes for the thermo-conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals: Part 2. Gasification systems. Energy Convers Manag 2009;50:3158-68.
4. Elbir M, Moubarik A, Rakib EM, Grimi N, Amhoud A, Miguel G, et al. Valorization of Moroccan olive stones by using it in particleboard panels. Maderas Ciencia y Tecnología 2012;14:361-71.
5. Fernández-Bolaños J, Felizón B, Brenes M, Guillén R, Heredia A. Hydroxytyrosol and tyrosol as the main compounds found in the phenolic fraction of steam-exploded olive stones. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1998;75:1643-9.
6. Garrido-Fernández A, Fernández-Diez MJ, Adamos MR. Hall C, editor. Physical and chemical characteristics of the olive fruit. London: Table Olives; 1997.
7. Herron JS, King JD, White DC. Recovery of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate from estuarine microflora. Appl Environ Microbiol 1978;35:251-7.
8. Jin Q, Zhang H, Yan L, Qu L, Huang H. Kinetic characterization for hemicellulose hydrolysis of corn stover in a dilute acid cycle spray flow-through reactor at moderate conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 2011;35:4158-64.
9. Leksawasdi N, Joachimsthal E, Rogers P. Mathematical modelling of ethanol production from glucose/xylose mixtures by recombinant Zymomonas mobilis. Biotechnol Lett 2001;23:1087-93.
10. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, Wells ML, York SW, Preston JF, Ingram LO. Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime. Biotechnol Prog 2001;17:287-93.
11. Millati R, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ. Effect of pH, time and temperature of overliming on detoxification of dilute-acid hydrolyzates for fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem 2002;38:515-22.
12. Moncada J, El-Halwagi MM, Cardona CA. Techno-economic analysis for a sugarcane biorefinery: Colombian case. Bioresour Technol 2013;135:533-43.
13. Najjar YSH. Gas turbine cogeneration systems: a review of some novel cycles. Appl Therm Eng 2000;20:179-97.
14. Parajó JC, Domínguez H, Domínguez JM. Biotechnological production of xylitol: Part 2. Operation in culture media made with commercial sugars. Bioresour Technol 1998;65:203-12.
15. Pitt W Jr, Haag G, Lee D. Recovery of ethanol from fermentation broths using selective sorption-desorption. Biotechnol Bioeng 1983;25:123-31.
16. 2. J Biotechnol 2004;114:187-98.
17. Rinaldi R, Schüth F. Acid hydrolysis of cellulose as the entry point into biorefinery schemes. ChemSusChem 2009;2:1096-107.
18. Rincón LE, Becerra LA, Moncada J, Cardona CA. Techno-economic analysis of the use of fired cogeneration systems based on sugar cane bagasse in south eastern and mid-western regions of Mexico. Waste Biomass Valorization 2014a;5:189-98.
19. Rincón LE, Hernández V, Cardona CA. Analysis of technological schemes for the efficient production of added-value products from Colombian oleochemical feedstocks. Process Biochemistry 2014b;49:474-89.
20. Romero-García JM, Niño L, Martínez-Patiño C, Álvarez C, Castro E, Negro MJ. Biorefinery based on olive biomass state of the art and future trends. Bioresour Technol 2014;159:421-32.
21. Shahhosseini S. Simulation and optimisation of PHB production in fed-batch culture of Ralstonia eutropha. Process Biochem 2004;39:963-9.
22. Spizzirri UG, Restuccia D, Chiricosta S, Parisi OI, Cirillo G, Curcio M, et al. Olive stones as a source of antioxidants for food industry. J Food Nutr Res 2011;50:57-67.
23. The International Olive Council. Olivae. Off Mag Int Olive Counc 2012.
24. Tochampa W, Sirisansaneeyakul S, Vanichsriratana W, Srinophakun P, Bakker H, Chisti Y. A model of xylitol production by the yeast Candida mogii. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2005;28:175-83.
25. 2-rich bio-syngas to CO-rich bio-syngas using biomass char: a useful approach for production of bio-methanol from bio-oil. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:6239-45.