Continuous objective recording of fetal heart rate and fetal movements could reliably identify fetal compromise, which could reduce stillbirth rates by facilitating timely management

Medical Hypotheses

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 410-417

  Brown, Rebecca ^a   Wijekoon, Jayawan H B ^a   Fernando, Anura ^a   Johnstone, Edward D ^a   Heazell, Alexander E P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE; FETAL MONITOR; FETAL WELL BEING; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MONITORING; FETUS MOVEMENT; FETUS MOVEMENT COUNTING; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PERINATAL MORTALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRENATAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STILLBIRTH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; OBSTETRICS; PERINATAL CARE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES;

CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FETAL DEATH; FETAL MONITORING; FETAL MOVEMENT; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; OBSTETRICS; PERINATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; STILLBIRTH; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 84908357137     PISSN: 03069877     EISSN: 15322777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. CMACE. Perinatal Mortality 2009. Centre for maternal and child enquiries, United Kingdom: London; 2011.
2. Gardosi J., Kady S.M., McGeown P., Francis A., Tonks A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005, 331(7525):1113-1117.
3. Maulik D. Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology 1997, Springer-Verlag.
4. Korteweg F.J., Gordijn S.J., Timmer A., Holm J.P., Ravise J.M., Erwich J.J. A placental cause of intra-uterine fetal death depends on the perinatal mortality classification system used. Placenta 2008, 29(1):71-80.
5. Flenady V., Frøen J.F., Halit Pinar R.T., et al. An evaluation of classification systems for stillbirth. BMC Women's Health 2009, 9.
6. Pearson J.F., Weaver J.B. Fetal activity and fetal wellbeing: an evaluation. BMJ 1976, 1(6021):1305-1307.
7. Sergent F., Lefevre A., Verspyck E., Marpeau L. Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: what to do?. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005, 33(11):861-869.
8. Froen J.F., Arnestad M., Frey K., Vege A., Saugstad O.D., Stray-Pedersen B. Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway, 1986-1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184(4):694-702.
9. Sadovsky E., Yaffe H. Daily fetal movement counting and fetal prognosis. Obstet Gynecol 1973, 41(6):845-850.
10. NICE. Antenatal care. 2008 [cited 20 November 2013]. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG62.
11. RCOG. Reduced Fetal Movements - Green-top Guideline 57. 2011 [cited 20 November 2013]. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/GTG57RFM25022011.pdf.
12. RCOG. The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus - green-top guideline No. 31. 2013 [cited 20 November 2013]. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/22.3.13GTG31SGA.pdf.
13. Whitworth M., Bricker L., Neilson J.P., Dowswell T. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 4(4):CD007058.
14. Haws R.A., Yakoob M.Y., Soomro T., Menezes E.V., Darmstadt G.L., Bhutta Z.A. Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009, 9(Suppl. 1):S5.
15. Hadlock F.P., Harrist R.B., Carpenter R.J., Deter R.L., Park S.K. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984, 150(2):535-540.
16. Hadlock F.P., Harrist R.B., Sharman R.S., Deter R.L., Park S.K. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements - a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985, 151(3):333-337.
17. Hadlock F.P., Harrist R.B., Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 1991, 181(1):129-133.
18. Bricker L., Neilson J.P., Dowswell T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, (4):1451.
19. Tveit J, Saastad E, Bordahl P, Stray-Pedersen B, Froen J. The epidemiology of decreased fetal movements. In: Proceedings of the Norwegian perinatal society conference Bodo, Norway; 2006.
20. Dutton P., Warrander L., Roberts S., et al. Predictors of poor perinatal outcome following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements - a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2012, 7(7):e39784. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039784.
21. Heazell A.E., Froen J.F. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008, 28(2):147-154.
22. Neldam S. Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal well-being. Dan Med Bull 1983, 30:274-278.
23. Moore T.R., Piacquadio K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989, 160(5 Pt 1):1075-1080.
24. Mangesi L., Hofmeyr G.J. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 1:CD004909.
25. Grant A., Elbourne D., Valentin L., Alexander S. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late deaths in normally formed singletons. Lancet 1989, 2(8659):345-349.
26. Cito G., Luisi S., Mezzesimi A., Cavicchioli C., Calonaci G., Petraglia F. Maternal position during non-stress test and fetal heart rate patterns. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005, 84(4):335-338.
27. Patrick J., Campbell K., Carmichael L., Natale R., Richardson B. Patterns of gross fetal body movements over 24-hour observation intervals during the last 10weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982, 142(4):363-371.
28. Rayburn W.F. Antepartum fetal assessment - monitoring fetal activity. Clin Perinatol 1982, 9(2):231-252.
29. Flenady V., MacPhail J., Gardener G., et al. Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Australia and New Zealand: a survey of obstetric practice. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2009, 49(4):358-363.
30. Smith V, Begley C, Devane D. Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Ireland: a national survey of midwives' and obstetricians' practices. Midwifery 2013; tp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.006i.
31. Heazell A.E., Green M., Wright C., Flenady V., Froen J.F. Midwives' and obstetricians' knowledge and management of women presenting with decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008, 87(3):331-339.
32. Reddy U.M., Filly R.A., Copel J.A., et al. Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 112(1):145-157.
33. Papageorghiou A.T., Yu C.K., Cicero S., Bower S., Nicolaides K.H. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002, 12(2):78-88.
34. ACOG ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013, 121(5):1122-1133.
35. Baschat A.A. Doppler application in the delivery timing of the preterm growth-restricted fetus: another step in the right direction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004, 23(2):111-118.
36. Walker D.M., Marlow N., Upstone L., et al. The Growth Restriction Intervention Trial: long-term outcomes in a randomized trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011, 204(1):34. e1-9.
37. Alfirevic Z., Stampalija T., Gyte G.M. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 1:CD007529.
38. Baschat A.A., Gembruch U., Harman C.R. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001, 18(6):571-577.
39. Grivell R.M., Alfirevic Z., Gyte G.M., Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 1:CD007863.
40. Rayburn W., Greene J., Donaldson M. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome. J Reprod Med 1980, 24(5):191-196.
41. Pattinson N., McCowan L. Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1999, CD001068.
42. Lalor J.G., Fawole B., Alfirevic Z., Devane D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, 1:CD000038.
43. Golde S.H., Montoro M., Good-Anderson B., et al. The role of nonstress tests, fetal biophysical profile, and contraction stress tests in the outpatient management of insulin-requiring diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984, 148(3):269-273.
44. Awad M.M. The fetal biophysical profile score: a routine screening technique for pregnant women. J Egypt Soc Obstet Gynecol 1991, 17(1):27-32.
45. de la Vega A., Verdiales M. Failure of intensive fetal monitoring and ultrasound in reducing the stillbirth rate. P R Health Sci J 2002, 21(2):123-125.
46. Sands. AFFIRM - can promoting awareness of baby's movements in pregnancy help reduce stillbirths? [cited 15 December 2014]. Available from: http://www.uk-sands.org/research/current-projects/sands-funded-projects/affirm-can-promoting-awareness-babys-movements.
47. Ott W.J. Development of a fetal risk assessment score for the prediction of neonatal outcome in the growth-restricted fetus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012, 25(10):1941-1944.
48. Chang C.H., Tsai P.Y., Yu C.H., Ko H.C., Chang F.M. Prenatal detection of fetal growth restriction by fetal femur volume: efficacy assessment using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007, 33(3):335-341.
49. Chang C.H., Yu C.H., Ko H.C., Chen C.L., Chang F.M. Fetal upper arm volume in predicting intrauterine growth restriction: a three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31(11):1435-1439.
50. Moran M., McAuliffe F.M. Imaging and assessment of placental function. J Clin Ultrasound 2011, 39(7):390-398.
51. Odibo A.O., Goetzinger K.R., Huster K.M., Christiansen J.K., Odibo L., Tuuli M.G. Placental volume and vascular flow assessed by 3D power Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Placenta 2011, 32(3):230-234.
52. Tomasovic S., Predojevic M. 4D ultrasound - medical devices for recent advances on the etiology of cerebral palsy. Acta Inform Med 2011, 19(4):228-234.
53. Benton S.J., Hu Y., Xie F., et al. Can placental growth factor in maternal circulation identify fetuses with placental intrauterine growth restriction?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012, 206(2):163. e1-7.
54. Nicolaides K, Rizzo G, Hecher K, Ximenes R. Doppler in obstetrics. 2002 [cited 16 December 2013]. Available from: http://www.fetalmedicine.com/fmf/Doppler%20in%20Obstetrics.pdf.
55. Monica. Introducing the Monica AN24. [cited 18 December 2013]. Available from: http://www.monicahealthcare.com/products/.
56. Fanelli A., Ferrario M., Piccini L., et al. Prototype of a wearable system for remote fetal monitoring during pregnancy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010, 2010:5815-5818.
57. Rauf Z., O'Brien E., Stampalija T., Ilioniu F.P., Lavender T., Alfirevic Z. Home labour induction with retrievable prostaglandin pessary and continuous telemetric trans-abdominal fetal ECG monitoring. PLoS One 2011, 6(11):e28129. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028129.
58. Graatsma E.M., Jacod B.C., van Egmond L.A., Mulder E.J., Visser G.H. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings. BJOG 2009, 116(2):334-337. discussion 337-8.
59. Sontag L.W., Wallace R.F. An apparatus for recording fetal movement. Am J Psychol 1933, 45:517-519.
60. Sadovsky E., Polishuk W.Z., Yaffe H., Adler D., Pachys F., Mahler Y. Fetal movements recorder, use and indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1977, 15(1):20-24.
61. Timor-Tritsch I., Zador I., Hertz R.H., Rosen M.G. Classification of human fetal movement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976, 126(1):70-77.
62. de Wit A.C., Nijhuis J.G. Validity of the Hewlett-Packard actograph in detecting fetal movements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003, 22(2):152-156.
63. Di Pietro J.A., Costigan K.A., Pressman E.K. Fetal movement detection: comparison of the Toitu actograph with ultrasound from 20 weeks gestation. J Matern Fetal Med 1999, 8(6):237-242.
64. Kribeche A., Tranquart F., Kouame D., Pourcelot L. The actifeus system: a multi doppler sensor system for monitoring fetal movements. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 33(3):430-438.
65. Wilson J.D., Govindan R.B., Hatton J.O., Lowery C.L., Preissl H. Integrated approach for fetal QRS detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008, 55(9):2190-2197.
66. Govindan R.B., Vairavan S., Ulusar U.D., et al. A novel approach to track fetal movement using multi-sensor magnetocardiographic recordings. Ann Biomed Eng 2011, 39(3):964-972.
67. Lutter W.J., Wakai R.T. Indices and detectors for fetal MCG actography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011, 58(6):1874-1880.
68. Vullings R., Peters C.H., Mischi M., Oei S.G., Bergmans J.W. Fetal movement quantification by fetal vectorcardiography: a preliminary study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008, 2008:1056-1059.
69. Mesbah M., Khlif M.S., East C., Smeathers J., Colditz P., Boashash B. Accelerometer-based fetal movement detection. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011, 7877-7880. (0.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091942).
70. Nishihara K., Horiuchi S., Eto H., Honda M. A long-term monitoring of fetal movement at home using a newly developed sensor: an introduction of maternal micro-arousals evoked by fetal movement during maternal sleep. Early Hum Dev 2008, 84(9):595-603.
71. Ryo E., Nishihara K., Matsumoto S., Kamata H. A new method for long-term home monitoring of fetal movement by pregnant women themselves. Med Eng Phys 2012, 34(5):566-572.
72. Qi Z. Portable foetus ECG (electrocardiograph) monitor (CN 103083000 A). 2013 [cited 19 December 2013]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/CN103083000A?cl=en%26dq=CN103083000++(A)%26hl=en%26sa=X%26ei=iKilUv_4BNCshQeOtoGYDw%26ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
73. Birla M, Padma MG, Subramani T, Viswanathan R, Nagaraj K, Varghese Z. (A portable device for fetal heart rate monitoring and a system thereof WO 2011137930 A1). 2010 [cited December 19 2013]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/WO2011137930A1?cl=en%26dq=WO2011137930++(A1)%26hl=en%26sa=X%26ei=BqmlUrvBBpOthQeryIH4CQ%26ved=0CDsQ6AEwAA.
74. Harrold LN, Diciaccio AR. Fetal movement monitor and method (WO2010098767 A1). 2009 [cited 19 December 2013]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/WO2010098767A1?cl=en%26dq=WO+2010098767+(A1)+-+FETAL+MOVEMENT+MONITOR+AND+METHOD%26hl=en%26sa=X%26ei=GKClUqeKLdLb7AbLh4HIBw%26ved=0CDcQ6AEwAA.
75. Qi L, Yi Z. Device for automatically detecting and identifying fetal movement signals. 2012 [cited 19 December 2013]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/CN202477656U?cl=en%26dq=CN202477656++(U)%26hl=en%26sa=X%26ei=n6WlUs6wBLGe7AaxhYHIDw%26ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA.
76. Bridge LR, Momont D, Dentino B, Wu J. Fetal monitoring tattoo (US 20130289361 A1). 2013 [cited 19 December 2013]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/US20130289361?dq=US2013289361++(A1)%26hl=en%26sa=X%26ei=8KSlUv6DOquS7Aazw4AY%26ved=0CDsQ6AEwAA.
77. Rui PT, Wei W, Siyuan X, Huaping D. Intelligent multi-scale measurement of fetal movement monitoring system (CN 103239234 A). 2013 [cited 19 December 2013]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/CN103239234A?cl=en%26dq=%E2%80%9CIntelligent+multi-scale+measurement+of+fetal+movement+monitoring+system%E2%80%9D%26hl=en%26sa=X%26ei=DKelUpbYNKzY7AaqhYCoAg%26ved=0CDcQ6AEwAA.
78. Rabinowitz R., Persitz E., Sadovsky E. The relation between fetal heart rate accelerations and fetal movements. Obstet Gynecol 1983, 61(1):16-18.
79. Bekedam D.J., Visser G.H. Effects of hypoxemic events on breathing, body movements, and heart rate variation: a study in growth-retarded human fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985, 153(1):52-56.
80. RCOG. Perinatal Management of Pregnant Women at the Threshold of Infant Viability (The Obstetric Perspective) - Scientific Impact Paper No. 41. 2014 [cited 30 June 2014]. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/SIPPretermbirth.pdf.