Development of a fetal risk assessment score for the prediction of neonatal outcome in the growth-restricted fetus

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1941-1944

  Ott, William J ^a  

^a Mercy Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biophysical profile; Doppler blood flow; Neonatal outcome

Indexed keywords

ABNORMAL LABORATORY RESULT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMNION FLUID; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; DELIVERY; DUCTUS VENOSUS; FEMALE; FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE; FETAL RISK ASSESSMENT SCORE; FETUS OUTCOME; FETUS WEIGHT; FUNCTION TEST; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; NEWBORN; NONSTRESS TEST; OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINATAL PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; UMBILICAL ARTERY; VEIN BLOOD FLOW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMNIOTIC FLUID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; FETAL WEIGHT; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; PREGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; UMBILICAL ARTERIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866383625     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.679712     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Evertson LR, Gauthier RJ, Schifrin BS, Paul RH. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I. Evolution of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;133:29-33. (Pubitemid 9098761)
2. ACOG Practice Bulletin #9, October 1999. Antepartum Fetal Surveillance.
3. Manning FA, Baskett TF, Morrison I, Lange I. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: a prospective study in 1,184 high-risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;140:289-294. (Pubitemid 11078548)
4. Finberg HJ, Kurtz AB, Johnson RL, Wapner RJ. The biophysical profile. A literature review and reassessments of its usefulness in the evaluation of fetal well-being. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9:583-591. (Pubitemid 20362831)
5. Manning FA. Dynamic ultrasound-based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical profile score. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1995;38:26-44.
6. Ott WJ. Current perspectives in antenatal fetal surveillance. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 2003;3:1-18. (Pubitemid 36503608)
7. Yoon BH, Romero R, Roh CR, Kim SH, Ager JW, Syn HC, Cotton D, Kim SW. Relationship between the fetal biophysical profile score, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1586-1594. (Pubitemid 24009202)
8. Wladimiroff JW, vd Wijngaard JA, Degani S, Noordam MJ, van Eyck J, Tonge HM. Cerebral and umbilical arterial blood flow velocity waveforms in normal and growth-retarded pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:705-709. (Pubitemid 17057827)
9. Mari G. Regional cerebral flow velocity waveforms in the human fetus. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13:343-346. (Pubitemid 24372042)
10. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Pietropolli A, Bufalino LM, Arduini D, Romanini C. Fetal cardiac and extracardiac flows preceding intrauterine death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:139-142.
11. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Talone PE, Arduini D, Romanini C. Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growthretarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:401-410. (Pubitemid 126720279)
12. Ott WJ. Comparison of the non-stress test and middle cerebral to umbilical artery systolic/diastolic velocity waveform ratio for the prediction of neonatal compromise. J. Maternal Fetal Investigation 1996;6:73-76. (Pubitemid 26184255)
13. Ott WJ, Mora G, Arias F, Sunderji S, Sheldon G. Comparison of the modified biophysical profile to a "new" biophysical profile incorporating the middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery velocity flow systolic/diastolic ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:1346-1353. (Pubitemid 28304640)
14. Figueras F, Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:288-300.
15. Mari G. Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics: from the diagnosis of fetal anemia to the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:613.e1-613.e9.
16. Ott WJ. Comparison of the non-stress test with the evaluation of centralization of blood flow for the prediction of neonatal compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:38-41. (Pubitemid 29410492)
17. Ott WJ. Value of fetal umbilical artery and carotid Doppler flow studies in the evaluation of suspected intrauterine growth retardation. J Matern Fetal Invest 1991;1:185-190.
18. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984;150:535-540. (Pubitemid 14179487)
19. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 1991;181:129-133.
20. Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999;26:557-77.
21. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-298. (Pubitemid 9075026)
22. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993;39:561-577. (Pubitemid 23118304)
23. Goetzinger KR, Odibo AO. Statistical analysis and interpretation of prenatal diagnostic imaging studies, Part 1: evaluating the efficiency of screening and diagnostic tests. J Ultrasound Med 2011;30:1121-1127.
24. Cosmi E, Ambrosini G, D'Antona D, Saccardi C, Mari G. Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106: 1240-1245. (Pubitemid 41668941)
25. Turan OM, Turan S, Gungor S, Berg C, Moyano D, Gembruch U, Nicolaides KH, et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:160-167.
26. Baschat AA, Galan HL, Bhide A, Berg C, Kush ML, Oepkes D, Thilaganathan B, et al. Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:41-47. (Pubitemid 43129089)
27. Mari G, Hanif F, Drennan K, Kruger M. Staging of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1469-77; quiz 1479. (Pubitemid 351519792)
28. Mäkikallio K, Räsänen J, Mäkikallio T, Vuolteenaho O, Huhta JC. Human fetal cardiovascular profile score and neonatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:48-54. (Pubitemid 351211931)
29. Baschat AA. Doppler application in the delivery timing of the preterm growth-restricted fetus: another step in the right direction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:111-118. (Pubitemid 38221782)