Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair

Surgical Infections

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 506-512

  Liang, Mike K ^a   Berger, Rachel L ^b   Nguyen, Mylan Thi ^a   Hicks, Stephanie C ^c   Li, Linda T ^b   Leong, Mimi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ADULT; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS CLASS; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HERNIOPLASTY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROPENSITY SCORE; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEROMA; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE; SYNTHETIC MESH; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; PIG; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; XENOGRAFT;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; ANIMALS; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HETEROGRAFTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84908304550     PISSN: 10962964     EISSN: 15578674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.090     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: Making the case for hernia research. Hernia 2012;16:179-183.
2. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004;240:578-583.
3. Choi JJ, Palaniappa NC, Dallas KB, et al. Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: Outcomes of 33, 832 cases. Ann Surg 2012;255:176-180.
4. Ventral Hernia Working Group, Breuing K, Butler CE, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: Review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 2010;148:544-558.
5. Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T, et al. Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: A systematic review. Am J Surg 2013;205:220-230.
6. Kissane NA, Itani KM. A decade of ventral incisional hernia repairs with biologic acellular dermal matrix: What have we learned? Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):194S-202S.
7. Beale EW, Hoxworth RE, Livingston EH, et al. The role of biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: A systematic review of the current literature. Am J Surg 2012;204:510-517.
8. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 2009;13:407-414.
9. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical site infection (SSI). Available at www.cdc.gov/hai/ssi/ssi.html Accessed April 1, 2013.
10. Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, et al. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:880-888.
11. Butler CE, Burns NK, Campbell KT, et al. Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211:368-376.
12. Harth KC, Broome AM, Jacobs MR, et al. Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: An experimental study. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2224-2229.
13. Milburn ML, Holton LH, Chung TL, et al. Acellular dermal matrix compared with synthetic implant material for repair of ventral hernia in the setting of peri-operative Staphylo-coccus aureus implant contamination: A rabbit model. Surg Infect 2008;9:433-442.