Setting our bibliographic references free: Towards open citation data

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 253-277

  Peroni, Silvio ^a   Dutton, Alexander ^b   Gray, Tanya ^b   Shotton, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citations; Open access; Open citation corpus; References; Semantic publishing; SPAR ontologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908296986     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/JD-12-2013-0166     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Agarwal, S., Choubey, L. and Yu, H. (2010), “Automatically classifying the role of citations in biomedical articles”, Proceedings of the 2010 AMIA Annual Symposium, pp. 11-15.
2. Aksnes, D.W. (2003), “A macro study of self-citation”, Scientometrics, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 235-246.
3. American Meteorological Society (2013), “Full and open access to data”, available at: www.ametsoc.org/policy/2013fullopenaccessdata_amsstatement.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
4. Attwood, T.K., Kell, D.B., McDermott, P., Marsh, J., Pettifer, S.R. and Thorne, D. (2010), “Utopia documents: linking scholarly literature with research data”, Bioinformatics, Vol. 26 No. 18, pp. i568-i574.
5. Attwood, T.K., Kell, D.B., McDermott, P., Marsh, J., Pettifer, S.R. and Thorne, D. (2009), “Calling international rescue: knowledge lost in literature and data landslide!”, Biochemical Journal, Vol. 424 No. 3, pp. 317-333.
6. Baez, M., Mussi, A., Casati, F., Birukou, A. and Marchese, M. (2010), “Liquid journals: scientific journals in the web 2.0 era”, Proceedings of the 10th annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL10), Vol. 395, ACM Press, New York, NY, US, doi:10.1145/1816123.1816198.
7. Baker, T., Bechhofer, S., Isaac, A., Miles, A., Schreiber, G. and Summers, E. (2013), “Key choices in the design of simple knowledge organization system (SKOS)”, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Vol. 20, pp. 35-49, doi:10.1016/j.websem.2013.05.001.
8. Beckett, D. (2004), “RDF/XML syntax specification (revised)”, W3C Recommendation World Wide Web Consortium, 10 February, available at: www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
9. Bergstrom, C.T., West, J.D. and Wiseman, M.A. (2008), “The eigenfactor™ metrics”, Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 28 No. 45, pp. 11433-11434.
10. Boulton, G. (2012), “Science as an open enterprise”, (Chair) Royal Society Report, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London, available at: http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-publicenterprise/ report/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
11. Bourne, P. (2005), “Will a biological database be different from a biological journal?”, PLoS Computational Biology, Vol. 1 No. 3, p. e34.
12. Brinkac, L.M., Davidsen, T., Beck, E., Ganapathy, A., Caler, E., Dodson, R.J. and Sutton, G. (2009), “Pathema: a clade-specific bioinformatics resource center for pathogen research”, Nucleic Acids Research, 38(Database), Vol. 38 No. S1, pp. D408-D414.
13. Burwell, S.M., VanRoekel, S., Park, T. and Mancini, D.J. (2013), “Open Data Policy – Managing Information as an Asset”, Memorandum M-13-13, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, available at: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-13.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
14. Cameron, R.D. (1997), “A universal citation database as a catalyst for reform in scholarly communication”, First Monday, Vol. 2 No. 4, available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/522/443 (accessed 24 February 2014).
15. Carpenter, P. (2012), “Nature publishing group releases linked data platform”, available at: www.nature.com/press_releases/linkeddata.html (accessed 24 February 2014).
16. Casati, F., Giunchiglia, F. and Marchese, M. (2007), “Liquid publications: scientific publications meet the web”, available at: http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/1313/1/073.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
17. Chadegani, A.A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M.M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M. and Ebrahim, M.A. (2013), “A comparison between two main academic literature collections: web of science and scopus databases”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 18-26
18. Ciancarini, P., Di Iorio, A., Nuzzolese, A.G., Peroni, S. and Vitali, F. (2013a), “Characterising citations in scholarly articles: an experiment”, in Lieto, A. and Cruciani, M. (Eds), Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition (AIC 2013), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1100, CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, pp. 124-129, available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1100/paper13.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
19. Ciancarini, P., Di Iorio, A., Nuzzolese, A.G., Peroni, S. and Vitali, F. (2013b), “Semantic annotation of scholarly documents and citations”, in Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Boella, G. and Micalizio, R. (Eds), Proceedings of 13th International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2013), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8249, Springer, Berlin, pp. 336-347, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03524-6_29.
20. Constantin, A., Pettifer, S. and Voronkov, A. (2013), “PDFX: fully-automated PDF-to-XML conversion of scientific literature”, Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng 2013), ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 177-180, doi:10.1145/2494266.2494271.
21. Cronin, B. (2000), “Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 440-453.
22. Davis, P.M., Lewenstein, B.V., Simon, D.H., Booth, J.G. and Connolly, M.J.L. (2008), “Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial”, BMJ, Vol. 337, p. a568, doi:10.1136/bmj.a568.
23. DCMI Usage Board (2012a), “DCMI metadata terms”, DCMI Recommendation, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 14 June, available at: http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
24. DCMI Usage Board (2012b), “Dublin core metadata element set”, Version 1.1. DCMI Recommendation, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 14 June, available at: http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/
25. de Solla Price, D.J. (1965), “Networks of scientific papers”, Science, Vol. 149 No. 3683, pp. 510-515 (accessed 24 February 2014).
26. Di Iorio, A., Nuzzolese, A.G. and Peroni, S. (2013a), “Characterising citations in scholarly documents: the citalo framework”, in Cimiano, P., Fernández, M., Lopez, V., Schlobach, S. and Völker, J. (Eds), ESWC 2013 Satellite Events - Revised Selected Papers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7955, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 66-77, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41242-4_6.
27. Di Iorio, A., Nuzzolese, A.G. and Peroni, S. (2013b), “Towards the automatic identification of the nature of citations”, in Garcia Castro, A., Lange, C., Lord, P. and Stevens, R. (Eds), Proceedings of 3rd Workshop on Semantic Publishing (SePublica 2013), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 994, CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, pp. 63-74, available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-994/paper-06.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
28. Duncan, E. and McAleese, R. (1982), “Qualified citation indexing online?”, in Williams, M.E. and Hogan, T.H. (Eds), Proceedings of 3rd 1982 National Online Meeting, Learned Information, Medford, NJ, pp. 77-85.
29. Finch, J. (2012), “Expanding access to published research – the finch report”, report of the UK Government Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research, Woburn House, 20-24 Tavistock Square, London, available at: www.researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
30. Franceschet, M. (2010), “A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on web of science and Google scholar”, Scientometrics, Vol. 83 No. 1, pp. 243-258.
31. Garfield, E. (2006), “The history and meaning of the journal impact factor”, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 295 No. 1, pp. 90-93.
32. Giles, C.L. and Councill I.G. (2004), “Who gets acknowledged: measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 101 No. 51, pp. 17599-17604.
33. Greenberg, S.A. (2009), “How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network”, BMJ, Vol. 339, pp. b2680-b2680, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2680.
34. Hahnel, M. (2013), “The reuse factor”, Nature, Vol. 502 No. 7471, pp. 298-298
35. Hammond, T. (2008), “RDF site summary 1.0 modules: PRISM”, available at: http://nurture.nature.com/rss/modules/mod_prism.html (accessed 24 February 2014).
36. Harnad, S. and Brody, T. (2004), “Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs non-OA articles in the same journals”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 6, doi:10.1045/june2004-harnad.
37. Harris, S. and Seaborne, A. (2013), “SPARQL 1.1 query language”, W3C Recommendation, World WideWeb Consortium, 21 March, available at: www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
38. IFLA Study Group on the FRBR (2009), Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records”, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, available at: www. ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records (accessed 24 February 2014).
39. Jörg, B. (2008), “Towards the nature of citations”, Poster Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2008), IOS Press, Amsterdam, available at: www.dfki.de/~brigitte/publications/FOIS08_Poster_Brigitte Joerg.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
40. Lawrence, D. (2001), “Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact”, Nature, Vol. 411 No. 6837, p. 521.
41. Liu, Y. and Rousseau, R. (2013), “Interestingness and the essence of citation”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 580-589.
42. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1989), “Problems of citation analysis: a critical review”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 342-349.
43. Meyer, B., Choppy, C., Staunstrup, J. and van Leeuwen, J. (2009), “Research evaluation for computer science”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 52 No. 4, p. 31-34.
44. Miles, A. and Bechhofer, S. (2009), “SKOS simple knowledge organization system, reference”, W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, 18 August, available at: www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
45. Moravcsik, M.J. and Murugesan, P. (1975), “Some results on the function and quality of citations”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 86-92.
46. Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F. and Parsia, B. (2012), “OWL 2 web ontology language: structural specification and functional-style syntax (second edition)”, W3C Recommendation, World WideWeb Consortium, 11 December, available at: www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
47. New South Wales Government (2013), Open Data Policy, Version 1.0, Department of Finance & Services, Sydney, available at: http://finance.nsw.gov.au/ict/sites/default/files/NSW%20Government%20Open%20Data%20Policy%201.0.pdf (accessed 7 October 2013).
48. Peroni, S. and Shotton, D. (2012), “FaBiO and CiTO: ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations”, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Vol. 17, pp. 33-43, doi:10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001.
49. Peroni, S., Motta, E. and d’Aquin, M. (2008), “Identifying key concepts in an ontology, through the integration of cognitive principles with statistical and topological measures”, in Domingue, J. and Anutariya, C. (Eds), Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC 2008), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5367, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 242-256, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89704-0_17.
50. Peroni, S., Shotton, D. and Vitali, F. (2012), “Scholarly publishing and linked data: describing roles, statuses, temporal and contextual extents”, in Sack, H. and Pellegrini, T. (Eds), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems (i-Semantics 2012), ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 9-16, doi:10.1145/2362499.2362502.
51. Piwowar, H. (2013), “Altmetrics: value all research products”, Nature, Vol. 493 No. 7431, pp. 159-159.
52. Piwowar, H. and Vision, T.J. (2013), “Data reuse and the open data citation advantage”, Peer J, Vol. 1, p. e175, doi:10.7717/peerj.175.
53. Piwowar, H., Day, R. and Fridsma, D. (2007), “Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate”, PLoS One, Vol. 2 No. 3, p. e308.
54. Priem, J. (2013), “Scholarship: beyond the paper”, Nature, Vol. 495 No. 7442, pp. 437-440.
55. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P. and Neylon, C. (2010), “Altmetrics: a manifesto”, available at: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto (accessed 24 February 2014).
56. Radev, D.R., Muthukrishnan, P., Qazvinian, V. and Abu-Jbara, A. (2013), “The ACL anthology network corpus”, To Appear in Language Resources and Evaluation, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 919-944.
57. Reis, R.B., Ribeiro, G.S., Felzemburgh, R.D.M., Santana, F.S., Mohr, S., Melendez, A.X.T.O. and Ko, A.I. (2008), “Impact of environment and social gradient on leptospira infection in urban slums”, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol. 2 No. 4, p. e228.
58. Research Councils UK (2013), “RCUK policy on open access”, available at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
59. Roemer, R.C. and Borchardt, R. (2012), “From bibliometrics to altmetrics: a changing scholarly landscape”, College & Research Libraries News, Vol. 73 No. 10, pp. 596-600, available at: http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/10/596.full (accessed 24 February 2014).
60. Shotton, D. (2009), “Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientific journal publishing”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 85-94.
61. Shotton, D. (2013), “Open citations”, Nature, Vol. 502 No. 7471, pp. 295-297.
62. Shotton, D., Portwin, K., Klyne, G. and Miles, A. (2009), “Adventures in semantic publishing: exemplar semantic enhancements of a research article”, PLoS Computational Biology, Vol. 5 No. 4, p. e1000361
63. Shotton, D.M., White, N.J. and Watson, H.C. (1972), “Conformational changes and inhibitor binding at the active site of elastase”, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Vol. 36, pp. 91-105, doi: 10.1101/SQB.1972.036.01.015.
64. Small, H. (1973), “Co-citation in the scientific literature: a newmeasure of the relationship between two documents”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 265-269.
65. Small, H. and Griffith, B.C. (1974), “The structure of scientific literatures i: identifying and graphing specialties”, Science Studies, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 17-40, available at: www.jstor.org/stable/284536 (accessed 24 February 2014).
66. Swan, A. (2009), “The open access citation advantages: studies and results to date”, School of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton, available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516/ (accessed 24 February 2014).
67. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A. and Tidhar, D. (2006), “Automatic classification of citation function”, Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 06), Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pp. 103-110.
68. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A. and Tidhar, D. (2009), “An annotation scheme for citation function”, Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, pp. 80-87, available at: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W06/W06-1613.pdf (accessed 24 February 2014).
69. Wellcome Trust (2013), “Open access policy statement”, available at: www.wellcome.ac.uk/Aboutus/Policy/Policy-and-position-statements/WTD002766.htm (accessed 24 February 2014).
70. Wouters, P. (1998), “The signs of science”, Scientometrics, Vol. 41 Nos 1-2, pp. 225-241.
71. Vision, T.J. (2010), “Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing”, BioScience, Vol. 60 No. 5, pp. 330-330.