FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations

Journal of Web Semantics

Volumn 17, Issue , 2012, Pages 33-43

  Peroni, Silvio ^a   Shotton, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

OWL; Publication characterization; Scholarly reference; Semantic publishing

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; BIBLIOGRAPHIES; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; ONTOLOGY;

AUTOMATED DISCOVERY; BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATIONS; BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS; PUBLISHING COMMUNITY; SCHOLARLY REFERENCE; SEMANTIC PUBLISHING; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY; VISUALIZATION TOOLS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 84870059835     PISSN: 15708268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. Carroll, G. Klyne, Resource description framework (RDF): concepts and abstract syntax, W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004, World Wide Web Consortium, 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
2. W3C OWL Working Group, OWL 2 web ontology language document overview, W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009, World Wide Web Consortium, 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
3. D. Shotton Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientific journal publishing Learned Publishing 22 2 2009 85 94 10.1087/2009202
4. D. Shotton, K. Portwin, G. Klyne, and A. Miles Adventures in semantic publishing: exemplar semantic enhancements of a research article PLoS Computational Biology 5 4 2009 e1000361 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000361
5. S. Peroni, D. Shotton, F. Vitali, The Live OWL Documentation Environment: a tool for the automatic generation of ontology documentation, in: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, EKAW 2012, 2012. Postprint available at: http://palindrom.es/phd/wp- content/uploads/2010/07/lodeekaw2012cr.pdf (last visited 25.07.2012) (in press).
6. D. Shotton CiTO, the citation typing ontology Journal of Biomedical Semantics 1 1 2010 S6 10.1186/2041-1480-1-S1-S6
7. A. Rector, Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in description logics and related formalisms including OWL, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 03, 2003, pp. 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/945645.945664.
8. D. Shotton, C. Caton, G. Klyne, Ontologies for sharing, ontologies for use, In The Ontogenesis Knowledge Blog, 2010. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog. org/2010/01/22/ontologies-for-sharing/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
9. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Dublin core metadata element set, Version 1.1, DCMI Recommendation, 2010. http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
10. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, DCMI metadata terms, DCMI Recommendation, 2010. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
11. International Digital Enterprise Alliance, Publishing requirements for industry standard metadata specification version 2.0, Alexandria, VA, USA: IDEAlliance, 2009. http://www.idealliance.org/specifications/prism (last visited 25.07.2012).
12. T. Hammond, RDF site summary 1.0 modules: PRISM, 2008. http://nurture.nature.com/rss/modules/modprism.html (last visited 25.07.2012).
13. A. Miles, S. Bechhofer, SKOS simple knowledge organization system reference, W3C Recommendation, 18 August 2009, World Wide Web Consortium, 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
14. D. Brickley, L. Miller, FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98, Namespace Document, 9 August 2010 - Marco Polo Edition, 2010. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
15. Y. Sure, S. Bloehdorn, P. Haase, J. Hartmann, D. Oberle, The SWRC ontology - semantic web for research communities, in: Proceedings of the 12th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA 2005, 2005, pp. 218-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1159501422.
16. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional requirements for bibliographic records final report, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 2009. http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr2008.pdf (last visited 25.07.2012).
17. B. D'Arcus, F. Giasson, Bibliographic ontology specification, Specification Document, 4 November 2009, 2009. http://bibliontology.com/ specification (last visited 25.07.2012).
18. P. Ciccarese, E. Wu, J. Kinoshita, G. Wong, M. Ocana, A. Ruttenberg, and T. Clark The SWAN biomedical discourse ontology Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41 5 2008 739 751 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.04.010
19. D. Becket, T. Berners-Lee, Turtle - terse RDF triple language, W3C Team Submission, 28 March 2011, World Wide Web Consortium, 2011. http://www.w3.org/ TeamSubmission/turtle/ (last visited 25.07.2012).
20. S. Peroni, D. Shotton, F. Vitali, Scholarly publishing and linked data: describing roles, statuses, temporal and contextual extents, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems, i-Semantics 2012, 2012. Postprint available at: http://palindrom.es/phd/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ tocisemanticscr.pdf (last visited 25.07.2012) (in press).
21. C. Lagoze, H. Van de Sompel, P. Johnston, M. Nelson, R. Sanderson, S. Warner, ORE user guide - primer, Open Archives Initiative, Object Reuse and Exchange, 2008. http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/primer (last visited 25.07.2012).
22. S. Teufel, A. Siddharthan, D. Tidhar, An annotation scheme for citation function, in: Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, SigDIAL06, 2006, pp. 80-87. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1654612 (last visited 25.07.2012).
23. B. Jörg, Towards the nature of citations, in: Poster Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, FOIS 2008, 2008. http://www.dfki.de/~brigitte/publications/ FOIS08PosterBrigitteJoerg.pdf (last visited 25.07.2012).
24. T. Groza, S. Handschuh, and S. Decker Capturing rhetoric and argumentation aspects within scientific publications Journal on Data Semantics 15 2011 1 36 10.1007/978-3-642-22630-41
25. J. Schneider, T. Groza, A. Passant, A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web, Semantic Web - Interoperability, Usability, Applicability (2012). Pre-press available at: http://iospress.metapress.com/content/ 016x47v66347462v/fulltext.pdf (last visited 25.07.2012) (in press).
26. A. de Waard From proteins to fairytales: directions in semantic publishing IEEE Intelligent Systems 25 2 2010 83 88 10.1109/MIS.2010.49
27. S. Toulmin The Uses of Argument 1959 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 0521827485
28. P. Ciccarese, D. Shotton, S. Peroni, T. Clark, CiTO + SWAN: the web semantics of bibliographic records, citations, evidence and discourse relationships, Semantic Web - Interoperability, Usability, Applicability (2012) Special Issue: New Models of Semantic Publishing in Science. Preprint available at: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/cito-swan-web-semantics- bibliographic-records-citations-evidence-and-discourse-relationships (last visited 25.07.2012).
29. A. Accomazzi, R. Dave, Semantic interlinking of resources in the virtual observatory era, 2011. arXiv:1103.5958, http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5958 (last visited 25.07.2012).