Unsupervised Outlier Profile Analysis

Cancer Informatics

Volumn 13, Issue , 2014, Pages 25-33

  Ghosh, Debashis ^a   Li, Song ^b  

^a Food Science and Human Nutrition   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomarkers; Genomic data integration; Heterogeneity; Microarray; Mixture model; Tumor subtypes

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA;

ARTICLE; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CANCER GENETICS; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE DOSAGE; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; HUMAN; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNSUPERVISED OUTLIER PROFILE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84908268451     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/CIN.S13969     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ge Y, Dudoit S, Speed TP. Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis. Test. 2003;12:1-44.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57:289-300.
3. Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Perner S, et al. Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science. 2005;310:644-8.
4. Tibshirani R, Hastie T. Outlier sums for differential gene expression analysis. Biostatistics. 2007;8:2-8.
5. Wu B. Cancer outlier differential gene expression detection. Biostatistics. 2007;8:566-75.
6. Ghosh D, Chinnaiyan AM. Genomic outlier profile analysis: mixture models, null hypotheses and nonparametric estimation. Biostatistics. 2009;10:60-9.
7. Ghosh D. Discrete nonparametric algorithms for outlier detection with genomic data. J Biopharm Stat. 2010;20:193-208.
8. Ghosh D. Detecting outlier genes from high-dimensional data: a fuzzy approach. Int J Syst Synth Biol. 2010;1:273-83.
9. Kadota K, Ye J, Nakai Y, Terada T, Shimizu K. ROKU: a novel method for identification of tissue-specific genes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:294.
10. Neyman J, Scott EL. On the use of C(a) optimal tests of composite hypotheses. Bull Inst Int Stat. 1966;41:477-97.
11. Neale BM, Rivas MA, Voight BF, et al. Testing for an unusual distribution of rare variants. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001322.
12. D'Agostino RB, Belanger A, D'Agostino RB Jr. A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am Stat. 1990;44:316-21.
13. Lindsay, B. G. Mixture Models: Theory, Geometry and Applications. NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics, Hayward, CA; 1995.
14. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:9440-5.
15. Phillips D, Ghosh D. Testing the disjunction hypothesis using Voronoi diagrams with applications to genetics. Ann Appl Stat. 2014;8:801-23.
16. Ghosh D. Incorporating the empirical null hypothesis into the Benjamini- Hochberg procedure. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2012;11:4.
17. Jiménez R, Yukich JE. Asymptotics for statistical distances based on Voronoi tessellations. J Theor Probab. 2002;15:503-41.
18. Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K. Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.
19. Turner, R. deldir: Delaunay Triangulation and Dirichlet (Voronoi) Tessellation. R Package Version 0.1-5; 2014. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=deldir.
20. Kim JH, Dhanasekaran SM, Mehra R, et al. Integrative analysis of genomic aberrations associated with prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8229-39.
21. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44-57.
22. Hansen KD, Timp W, Bravo HC, et al. Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nat Genet. 2011;43:768-75.
23. Mar JC, Matigian NA, Mackay-Sim A, et al. Variance of gene expression identifies altered network constraints in neurological disease. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002207.
24. Efron B. Selection and estimation for large-scale simultaneous inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 2004;96:96-104.