Anytime active learning

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2014, Pages 2048-2054

  Ramirez Loaiza, Maria E ^a   Culotta, Aron ^a   Bilgic, Mustafa ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING;

EID: 84908192631     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Donmez, P., and Carbonell, J. G. 2008. Proactive learning:: Cost-sensitive active learning with multiple imperfect oracles. In Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and Knowledge Mining - CIKM'08, 619.
2. Donmez, P.; Carbonell, J. G.; and Schneider, J. 2009. Efficiently learning the accuracy of labeling sources for selective sampling. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD'09, 259.
3. Fang, M.; Zhu, X.; and Zhang, C. 2012. Active Learning from Oracle with Knowledge Blind Spot. In Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence - ICML'12.
4. Haertel, R.; Ringger, E.; Seppi, K.; Carroll, J.; and Mcclanahan, P. 2008. Assessing the Costs of Sampling Methods in Active Learning for Annotation. In ACL, 65-68.
5. Kapoor, A.; Horvitz, E.; and Basu, S. 2007. Selective supervision: Guiding supervised learning with decision-theoretic active learning. In IJCAI, volume 7, 877-882.
6. Lewis, D. D., and Gale, W. A. 1994. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 3-12.
7. Maas, A. L.; Daly, R. E.; Pham, P. T.; Huang, D.; Ng, A. Y.; and Potts, C. 2011. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 142-150. Portland, Oregon, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Mazzoni, D.; Wagstaff, K.; and Burl, M. 2006. Active learning with irrelevant examples. In ECML, 695-702.
9. Nigam, K.; McCallum, A.; Thrun, S.; and Mitchell, T. 1998. Learning to classify text from labeled and unlabeled documents. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National/Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence/Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, AAAI'98/IAAI'98, 792-799.
10. Ramirez-Loaiza, M. E.; Culotta, A.; and Bilgic, M. 2013. Towards anytime active learning: Interrupting experts to reduce annotation costs. In KDD Workshop on Interactive Data Exploration and Analytics (IDEA).
11. Roy, N., and McCallum, A. 2001. Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 441-448.
12. Settles, B.; Craven, M.; and Friedland, L. 2008. Active learning with real annotation costs. In Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Cost-Sensitive Learning, 1-10.
13. Settles, B. 2012. Active Learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool.
14. Tomanek, K., and Hahn, U. 2010. A comparison of models for cost-sensitive active learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, 1247-1255.
15. Wallace, B. C.; Small, K.; Brodley, C. E.; and Trikalinos, T. A. 2011. Who should label what? instance allocation in multiple expert active learning. In Proc. of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM).
16. Yan, Y.; Fung, G. M.; Rosales, R.; and Dy, J. G. 2011. Active learning from crowds. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), 1161-1168.