Assessing the costs of sampling methods in active learning for annotation

ACL-08: HLT - 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 65-68

  Haertel, Robbie ^a   Ringger, Eric ^a   Seppi, Kevin ^a   Carroll, James ^a   McClanahan, Peter ^a  

^a Brigham Young University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ACTIVE LEARNING; COST MODELING; SAMPLING METHOD; TIME SPENT; TREEBANKS; USER STUDY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84859890788     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1557690.1557708     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. S. Engelson and I. Dagan. 1996. Minimizing manual annotation cost in supervised training from corpora. In Proc. of ACL, pages 319-326.
2. R. Hwa. 2004. Sample selection for statistical parsing. Computational Linguistics, 30:253-276.
3. G. Ngai and D. Yarowsky. 2000. Rule writing or annotation: cost-efficient resource usage for base noun phrase chunking. In Proc. of ACL, pages 117-125.
4. M. Osborne and J. Baldridge. 2004. Ensemble-based active learning for parse selection. In Proc. of HLTNAACL, pages 89-96.
5. E. Ringger, P. McClanahan, R. Haertel, G. Busby, M. Carmen, J. Carroll, K. Seppi, and D. Lonsdale. 2007. Active learning for part-of-speech tagging: Accelerating corpus annotation. In Proc. of Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pages 101-108.
6. E. Ringger, M. Carmen, R. Haertel, K. Seppi, D. Londsale, P. McClanahan, J. Carroll, and N. Ellison. 2008. Assessing the costs of machine-assisted corpus annotation through a user study. In Proc. of LREC.
7. H. S. Seung, M. Opper, and H. Sompolinsky. 1992. Query by committee. In Proc. of CoLT, pages 287- 294.
8. S. Thrun and K.Moeller. 1992. Active exploration in dynamic environments. In NIPS, volume 4, pages 531- 538.
9. K. Tomanek, J. Wermter, and U. Hahn. 2007. An approach to text corpus construction which cuts annotation costs and maintains reusability of annotated data. Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL, pages 486-495.
10. K. Toutanova and C. Manning. 2000. Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy partof- speech tagger. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 63-70.