A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 46, Issue Part A, 2015, Pages 184-192

  Jakus, Grega ^a   Dicke, Christina ^b   Sodnik, Jaka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory display; Head up display; Vehicle

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURE; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; OPTICAL DESIGN;

AUDIO-VISUAL; AUDITORY DISPLAY; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; DRIVING SIMULATOR; HEAD UP DISPLAYS; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; MULTI-MODAL DISPLAYS; MULTI-MODAL INTERFACES;

VEHICLES;

ACCELERATION; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISPLAY; CAR DRIVING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DISPLAY SYSTEM; DRIVING ABILITY; DRIVING SPEED; FEMALE; HEAD UP DISPLAY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MALE; MOTOR VEHICLE; MULTIMODAL AUDITORY AND VISUAL DISPLAY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; WORKLOAD; YOUNG ADULT; ASSOCIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEARING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR VEHICLES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84908163202     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ® Text-to-Speech Demo 2014, AT&T, (Accessed June 12). http://www2.research.att.com/%7Ettsweb/tts/demo.php.
2. Ablassmeier M., Poitschke T., Wallhoff F., Bengler K., Rigoll G. Eye gaze studies comparing head-up and head-down displays in vehicles. Proc. of ICME 2007 2007, 2250-2252.
3. Andre A.D., Wickens C.D. When users want what's not best for them. Ergon. Des. Q. Hum. Fact. Appl. 1995, 3:10-14.
4. Biever W.J. Auditory-based Supplemental Information Processing Demand Effects on Driving Performance 2002, Master's Thesis, Virginia Tech.
5. Burnett G.E. Aroad-based evaluation of a head-up display for presenting navigation information. Proc. of the Tenth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2003, 180-184. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. CCC "MirrorLink." Car Connectivity Consortium 2014, (Accessed June 12). http://www.mirrorlink.com/.
7. Charissis V., Papanastasiou S., Vlachos G. Comparative study of prototype automotive HUD vs. HDD: collision avoidance simulation and results. In Proceedings of the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress 2008 2008.
8. Gish K.W., Staplin L. Human Factors Aspects of Using Head up Displays in Automobiles: a Review of the Literature 1995, Report No. DOT HS 808 320, Department of Transportation, Washington: U.S.
9. Haines R.F. Abreakdown in simultaneous information processing. Presbyopia Research 1991, 171-175. Plenum, New York. G. Obrecht, L. Stark (Eds.).
10. Hart S.G., Staveland L.E. Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload 1988, 139-183. Elsevier, Amsterdam. P.A. Hancock, N. Meshkati (Eds.).
11. Horrey W.J., Wickens C.D. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Hum. Fact. J. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. 2004, 46(4):611-624.
12. Lai J., Cheng K., Green P., Tsimhoni O. On the road and on the web?: Comprehension of synthetic and human speech while driving. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM 2001, 206-212.
13. Laugwitz B., Held T., Schrepp M. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. HCI and Usability for Education and Work 2008, 63-76. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
14. Lee J.D., Morgan J., Wheeler W.A., Hulse M.C., Dingus T.A. Development of Human Factors Guidelines for Advanced Traveler Information Systems and Commercial Vehicles: ATIS and CVO Functional Description 1995, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
15. Liu Y.-C. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems. Ergonomics 2001, 44(4):425-442.
16. Liu Y.-C., Wen M.-H. Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. Int. J. Hum. Comp. Stud. 2004, 61(5):679-697.
17. Multisoft City Car Driving 1.2 Description 2013, Multisoft, (accessed April 16). http://citycardriving.com/products/citycardriving12.
18. Prinzel L.J., Risser M. Head-up Displays and Attention Capture 2004, Tech. Rep. NASA/TM-2004-213000, NASA - Langley Research Center, Hampton.
19. Sodnik J., Dicke C., Tomazic S., Billinghurst M. Auser study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving. Int. J. Hum. Comp. Stud. 2008, 66(5):318-332.
20. Sojourmer R.J., Antin J.F. The effects of a simulated head-up display speedometer on perceptual task performance. Hum. Factors 1990, 32(3):329-339.
21. Thomas L.C., Wickens C.D. Visual displays and cognitive tunneling: frames of reference effects on spatial judgments and change detection. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting 2001, 336-340.
22. Tretten P., Gärling A., Nilsson R., Larsson T. An on-road study of head-up display: preferred location and acceptance levels. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2011, vol. 55(1):1914-1918.
23. Tufano D. Automotive HUDs: the overlooked safety issues. Hum. Factors 1997, 39(2):303-311.
24. Weinberg G., Harsham B., Medenica Z. Evaluating the usability of a head-up display for selection from choice lists in cars. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) 2011, 39-46.
25. Weinberg G., Harsham B., Medenica Z. Investigating HUDs for the presentation of choice lists in car navigation systems. Proceedings of the Sixth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (DAC) 2011, 195-202.
26. Wickens C.D., Dixon S.R., Seppelt B. Auditory preemption versus multiple resources: who wins in interruption management?. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting 2005, 463-467.
27. Wittmann M., Kiss M., Gugg P., Steffen A., Fink M., Pöppel E., Kamiya H. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Appl. Ergon. 2006, 37(2):187-199.
28. Yoo H., Tsimhoni O., Watanabe H., Green P., Shah R. Display of HUD Warnings to Drivers: Determining an Optimal Location 1999, Tech. Rep. UMTRI-99-9, The University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI), Ann Arbor.
29. Yung-Ching L. Effects of using head-up display in automobile context on attention demand and driving performance. Displays 2003, 24(4-5):157-165.