Y-linked Mendelian inheritance of giant and dwarf male morphs in shell-brooding cichlids

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1794, 2014, Pages

  Ocana, Sabine Wirtz ^a   Meidl, Patrick ^b   Bonfils, Danielle ^a   Taborsky, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Alleles of large effect; Alternative tactics; Cichlid fish; Genetic architecture; Mendelian polymorphism; Sex linked inheritance

Indexed keywords

ALLEE EFFECT; ANTAGONISM; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BREEDING SITE; CICHLID; CONSPECIFIC; DIMORPHISM; FITNESS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; MALE; NICHE; PATERNITY; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION; SHELL; SNAIL; SPERM COMPETITION;

CICHLIDAE;

EID: 84908136657     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0253     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Avise JC, Jones AG, Walker D, DeWoody JA et al. 2002 Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Ann. Rev. Genet. 36, 19-45. (doi:10. 1146/annurev.genet.36.030602.090831)
2. Shuster SM, Wade MJ. 2003 Mating systems and strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Oliveira RF, Brockmann HJ, Taborsky M. 2008 Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach, pp. 1-507. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Mank JE, Avise JC. 2006 Comparative phylogenetic analysis of male alternative reproductive tactics in ray-finned fishes. Evolution 60, 1311-1316. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01209.x)
5. Taborsky M, Oliveira RF, Brockmann HJ. 2008 The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. In Alternative reproductive tactics. An integrative approach (eds RF Oliveira, M Taborsky, HJ Brockmann), pp. 1-21. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ. 2010 Alternative tactics and life history phenotypes. In Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms (ed. PM Kappeler), pp. 537-586. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
7. Taborsky M. 1994 Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Adv. Study Behav. 23, 1-100. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60351-4)
8. Gross MR. 1996 Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 92-98. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)81050-0)
9. Roff DA. 1996 The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 71, 3-35. (doi:10.1086/419266)
10. Rowland J, Emlen DJ. 2009 Two thresholds, three male forms result in facultative male trimorphism in beetles. Science 323, 773-776. (doi:10.1126/ science.1167345)
11. Tomkins JL, Hazel WN, Penrose MA, Radwan JW, LeBas NR. 2011 Habitat complexity drives experimental evolution of a conditionally expressed secondary sexual trait. Curr. Biol. 21, 569-573. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.032)
12. Zimmerer EJ, Kallmann KD. 1989 Genetic basis for alternative reproductive tactics in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus nigrensis. Evolution 43, 1298-1307. (doi:10.2307/2409364)
13. Shuster SM, Wade MJ. 1991 Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350, 608-610. (doi:10.1038/ 350608a0)
14. Lank DB, Smith CM, Hanotte O, Burke T, Cooke F. 1995 Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating behaviour in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax. Nature 378, 59-62. (doi:10.1038/378059a0)
15. Tsubaki Y. 2003 The genetic polymorphism linked to mate-securing strategies in the male damselfly Mnais costalis Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Popul. Ecol. 45, 263-266. (doi:10.1007/s10144- 003-0162-8)
16. Sinervo B. 2001 Runaway social games, genetic cycles driven by alternative male and female strategies, and the origin of morphs. Genetica 112, 417-434. (doi:10.1023/A:1013360426789)
17. Johnston SE, Gratten J, Berenos C, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Slate J. 2013 Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 502, 93-95. (doi:10.1038/nature12489)
18. Taborsky M. 2001 The evolution of bourgeois, parasitic, and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. J. Hered. 92, 100-110. (doi:10.1093/jhered/ 92.2.100)
19. Sato T, Hirose M, Taborsky M, Kimura S. 2004 Size-dependent male alternative reproductive tactics in the shell-brooding cichlid fish Lamprologus callipterus in Lake Tanganyika. Ethology 110, 49-62. (doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00944.x)
20. Taborsky M. 2008 Alternative reproductive tactics in fish. In Alternative reproductive tactics (eds R Oliveira, M Taborsky, HJ Brockmann), pp. 251-299. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Sato T. 1994 Active accumulation of spawning substrate: a determinant of extreme polygyny in a shell-brooding cichlid fish. Anim. Behav. 48, 669-678. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1286)
22. Schütz D, Taborsky M. 2005 The influence of sexual selection and ecological constraints on an extreme sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid. Anim. Behav. 70, 539-549. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.010)
23. Schütz D, Parker GA, Taborsky M, Sato T. 2006 An optimality approach to male and female body sizes in an extremely size-dimorphic cichlid fish. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 1393-1408.
24. Wirtz-Ocana S, Schütz D, Pachler G, Taborsky M. 2013 Paternal inheritance of growth in fish pursuing alternative reproductive tactics. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1614-1625. (doi:10.1002/ece3.570)
25. Andersson M. 1994 Sexual selection, p. 599. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Lande R. 1980 Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34, 292-305. (doi:10.2307/2407393)
27. Lank DB, Farrell LL, Burke T, Piersma T, McRae SB. 2013 A dominant allele controls development into female mimic male and diminutive female ruffs. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130653. (doi:10.1098/rsbl. 2013.0653)
28. Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173, 176-187. (doi:10.1086/595841)
29. van Doorn G. 2009 Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1168, 52-71. (doi:10.1111/j.1749- 6632.2009.04573.x)
30. Mullon C, Pomiankowski A, Reuter M. 2012 The effects of selection and genetic drift on the genomic distribution of sexually antagonistic alleles. Evolution 66, 3743-3753. (doi:10.1111/j.1558- 5646.2012.01728.x)
31. Pennell TM, Morrow EH. 2013 Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1819-1834. (doi:10. 1002/ece3.540)
32. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR. 1996 Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20, 1004.
33. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. 1998 Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7, 639-655. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998. 00374.x)
34. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007 Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16, 1099-1106. (doi:10. 1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x)
35. Maan ME, Taborsky M. 2008 Sexual conflict over breeding substrate causes female expulsion and offspring loss in a cichlid fish. Behav. Ecol. 19, 302-308. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arm129)
36. Schütz D, Taborsky M. 2000 Giant males or dwarf females: what determines the extreme sexual size dimorphism in Lamprologus callipterus? J. Fish Biol. 57, 1254-1265. (doi:10.1006/jfbi.2000.1388)
37. Ota K, Kohda M, Sato T. 2010 Why are reproductively parasitic fish males so small?- influence of tactic-specific selection. Naturwissenschaften 97, 1113-1116. (doi:10.1007/ s00114-010-0725-4)
38. Devlin RH, Nagahama Y. 2002 Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208, 191-364. (doi:10. 1016/S0044-8486(02)00057-1)
39. Lampert KP, Schmidt C, Fischer P, Volff JN, Hoffmann C, Muck J, Lohse MJ, Ryan MJ, Schartl M. 2010 Determination of onset of sexual maturation and mating behavior by melanocortin receptor 4 polymorphisms. Curr. Biol. 20, 1729-1734. (doi:10. 1016/j.cub.2010.08.029)
40. Lindholm AK, Brooks R, Breden F. 2004 Extreme polymorphism in a Y-linked sexually selected trait. Heredity 92, 156-162. (doi:10.1038/ sj.hdy.6800386)
41. Farr JA. 1989 Sexual selection and secondary sexual differentiation in poeciliids: determinants of male mating success and the evolution of female choice. In Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae) (eds GK Meffe, FF Snelson), pp. 91-123. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42. Shuster SM, Sassaman C. 1997 Genetic interaction between male mating strategy and sex ratio in a marine isopod. Nature 388, 373-377. (doi:10. 1038/41089)
43. DeWoody JA, Avise JC. 2001 Genetic perspectives on the natural history of fish mating systems. J. Hered. 92, 167-172. (doi:10.1093/jhered/92.2.167)
44. Gadgil M. 1972 Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 106, 574-580. (doi:10.1086/282797)
45. Bleay C, Comendant T, Sinervo B. 2007 An experimental test of frequency-dependent selection on male mating strategy in the field. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2019-2025. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2007.0361)
46. Tomkins JL, Hazel W. 2007 The status of the conditional evolutionarily stable strategy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 522-528. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007. 09.002)
47. Neff BD, Svensson EI. 2013 Polyandry and alternative mating tactics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120045. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0045)