Extreme polymorphism in a Y-linked sexually selected trait

Heredity

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 156-162

  Lindholm, A K ^a,b   Brooks, R ^b   Breden, F ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Genetic polymorphism; Poecilia parae; Sexual selection; Y chromosome

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; COLOR MORPH; POLYMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENDER AND SEX; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PHENOTYPE; REVIEW; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUAL MATURATION; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PHENOTYPE; POECILIA; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX DETERMINATION (GENETICS); SEXUAL MATURATION; VARIATION (GENETICS); Y CHROMOSOME;

GUYANA; SOUTH AMERICA; SURINAME;

ANIMALIA; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; POECILIA; POECILIA PARAE;

EID: 1842562398     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800386     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Alonzo SH, Sinervo B (2001). Mate choice games, context-dependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49: 176-186.
2. Angus RA (1989). A genetic overview of poeciliid fishes. In: Meffe GK, Snelson Jr FF (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ. pp 51-68.
3. Bourne GR, Breden F, Allen TC (2003). Females prefer carotenoid males as mates in the pentamorphic livebearing fish, Poecilia parae. Natur Wissenschaften 90: 402-405.
4. Breden F, Ptacek M, Rashed M, Taphorn D, Augusto de Figueiredo C (1999). Molecular phylogeny of the live-bearing fish genus Poecilia (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 12: 95-104.
5. Brooks R (2000). Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 67-70.
6. Calsbeek R, Alonzo SH, Zamudio K, Sinervo B (2002). Sexual selection and alternative mating behaviours generate demographic stochasticity in small populations. Proc Roy Soc London B 269: 157-164.
7. Clarke B (1962). Balanced polymorphism and the diversity of sympatric species. In: Nichols D (ed) Taxonomy and Geography. Systematics Association: Oxford. pp 47-70.
8. Constantz GD (1989). Reproductive biology of poeciliid fishes. In: Meffe GK, Snelson Jr. FF (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ. pp 33-49.
9. Eigenmann CH (1894). Notes on some South American fishes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 7: 625-637.
10. Eigenmann CH (1909). Reports on the expedition to British Guiana of the Indiana University and the Carnegie Museum, 1908. Some new genera and species of fishes from British Guiana. Ann Carnegie Mus 6: 4-54.
11. Endler JA (1978). A predator's view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11: 319-364.
12. Endler JA (1983). Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Env Biol Fish 9: 173-190.
13. Farr JA (1976). Social facilitation of male sexual behavior, intrasexual competition, and sexual selection in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 30: 707-717.
14. Farr JA (1977). Male rarity or novelty, female choice behavior, and sexual selection in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 31: 162-168.
15. Fisher RA (1931). The evolution of dominance. Biol Rev 6: 345-368.
16. Godin, J-GJ, McDonough HE (2003). Predator preference for brightly colored males in the guppy: a viability cost for a sexually selected trait. Behav Ecol 14: 194-200.
17. Haskins CP, Haskins EF, McLaughlin JJA, Hewitt RE (1961). Polymorphism and population structure in Lebistes reticulatus, an ecological study. In: Blair, WF (ed) Vertebrate Speciation. University of Texas Press: Austin. pp 320-395.
18. Hughes KA, Du L, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (1999). Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 58: 907-916.
19. Keith P, Le Bail P-Y, Planquette P (2000). Atlas des Poissons d'Eau Douce de Guyana, tome 2 fasicule 1. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle: Paris.
20. Kondrashov AS, Kondrashov FA (1999). Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 351-354.
21. Lande R (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 3721-3725.
22. Lande R, Wilkinson GS (1999). Models of sex-ratio meiotic drive and sexual selection in stalk-eyed flies. Genet Res 74: 245-253.
23. Liley NR (1963). Reproductive Isolation in Some Sympatric Species of Fishes. DPhil Thesis, Oxford.
24. Liley NR (1966). Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes. Behav Suppl 13: 1-197.
25. Lindholm AK, Breden F (2002). Sex chromosomes and sexual selection in poeciliid fishes. Am Nat 160: S214-S224.
26. Magurran A (1998). Population differentiation without speciation. Phil Trans Roy Soc London B 353: 275-286.
27. Reinhold K (1998). Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44: 1-7.
28. Ritchie MG, Phillips SDF (1998). The genetics of sexual isolation. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH (eds) Endless Forms. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp 291-308.
29. Rice WR (1984). Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
30. Rice WR (1987). Genetic hitchiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome. Genetics 116: 161-167.
31. Rice WR (1992). Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science 256: 1436-1439.
32. Rice WR (1994). Degeneration of a nonrecombining chromosome. Science 263: 230-232.
33. Rosen DE, Bailey RM (1963). The poeciliid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes), their structure, zoogeography, and systematics. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 126: 3-126.
34. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (1991). Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350: 608-610.
35. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969). Biometry. Freeman: San Francisco.
36. Sinervo B (2001). Runaway social games, genetic cycles driven by alternative male and female strategies, and the origin of morphs. Genetica 112-113: 417-434.
37. Sinervo B, Svensson E (2002). Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity 89: 329-338.
38. Winemiller KO, Leslie M, Roche R (1990). Phenotypic variation in male guppies from natural inland populations: an additional test of Haskins' sexual selection/predation hypothesis. Environ Biol Fish 29: 179-191.