Knowledge Creation: Knowledge synthesis

Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 15-34

  Tetzlaff, Jennifer ^a,b,c   Tricco, Andrea C ^a,b   Moher, David ^a,b,c  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889812899     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444311747.ch2     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Chalmers I,Hedges LV, Cooper H A brief history of research synthesis EvalHealth Prof 2002;25[1]:1-12.
2. Naylor CD Clinical decisions: from art to science and back again Lancet 2001;358[9281]:9281-523.
3. Grimshaw JM, Santesso N, Cumpston M, Mayhew A, McGowan J Knowledge for knowledge translation: the role of the Cochrane Collaboration J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26[1]:1-55.
4. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, CaswellW, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26[1]: 13-24.
5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Randomized controlled trials registration/ application checklist. [document on the Internet]. 2006. URL http://www .cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/rct reg e.pdf [accessed July 30, 2008].
6. Graham ID, Tetroe J Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation Acad Emerg Med 2007;14[11]:11-936.
7. The Cochrane Collaboration. [homepage on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www.cochrane.org/ [accessed July 30, 2008].
8. Campbell Collaboration. [homepage on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www .campbellcollaboration.org [accessed July 29, 2008].
9. Atkins D, Fink K, Slutsky J. Better information for better health care: the Evidencebased Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ann Intern Med 2005;142[12 Pt 2]:1035-41.
10. Joanna Briggs Institute. [homepage on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www .joannabriggs.edu.au/about/home.php [accessed July 29, 2008].
11. Petticrew M Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions BMJ 2001;322[7278]:7278-98.
12. Stone PW Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice Appl Nurs Res 2002;15[3]:3-197.
13. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds.). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.0. [document on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www.cochrane-handbook.org [accessed July 30, 2008].
14. Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, et al How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective Qual Res 2006;6[1]:1-27.
15. Gregoire G, Derderian F, Le LJ. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48[1]: 159-63.
16. Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German Lancet 1997;350[9074]:9074-326.
17. Moher D, Pham B, Klassen TP, Schulz KF, Berlin JA, Jadad AR, et al. What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53[9]:964-72.
18. Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study Int J Epidemiol 2002;31[1]:1-115.
19. Pan Z, Trikalinos TA, Kavvoura FK, Lau J, Ioannidis JP. Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature. PLoS Med 2005;2[12]:e334.
20. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Issue 2. Art. No.: MR000010. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000010. pub3.
21. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Swiontkowski MF, Sprague S, et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A[4]:615-21.
22. Rosmarakis ES, Soteriades ES, Vergidis PI, Kasiakou SK, Falagas ME From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals FASEB J 2005;19[7]:7-673.
23. Toma M, McAlister FA, Bialy L, Adams D, Vandermeer B, Armstrong PW Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials JAMA 2006;295[11]:11-1281.
24. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, vonElm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Issue 2. Art. No.: MR000005. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub3.
25. von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramer MR. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:12.
26. U.S. National Library ofMedicine .Medical literature analysis and retrieval system online - PubMed. [homepage on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed [accessed March 19, 2008].
27. Excerpta Medica Database. [homepage on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www.embase.com/ [accessed March 19, 2008].
28. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The Cochrane Library. [homepage on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/mrwhome/106568753/HOME [accessed March 18, 2008].
29. Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson D, Cogo E, Horsley T, et al. Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. In press 2008.
30. Luxembourg Convention Definition of Grey Literature: 3rd International Conference on Grey Literature: Luxembourg, 1997; updated in New York, 2004.
31. Gotzsche PC Multiple publication of reports of drug trials Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989;36[5]:5-429.
32. Tramer MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study BMJ 1997;315[7109]:7109-635.
33. Bailey BJ Duplicate publication in the field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126[3]:3-211.
34. Barden J, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Oral valdecoxib and injected parecoxib for acute postoperative pain: a quantitative systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol 2003;3[1]:1.
35. Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, Ben-Porat L, Berman B. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr 2002;2:3.
36. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography Int J Epidemiol 2007;36[3]:3-666.
37. Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles JAMA 2004;291[20]:20-2457.
38. Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman DG Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research CMAJ 2004;171[7]:7-735.
39. Chan AW, Altman DG. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors. BMJ 2005; 330[7494]:753.
40. Fleiss JL. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1993;2[2]: 121-45.
41. Egger M, Davey SG, Altman D. (eds.). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. 2nd ed. London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2001.
42. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10[Suppl 1]:6-20.
43. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR Bayesian methods inmeta-analysis and evidence synthesis Stat Methods Med Res 2001;10[4]:4-277.
44. Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review Health Technol Assess 2000;4[38]:38-1.
45. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement Onkologie 2000;23[6]:6-597.
46. Skalsky K, Yahav D, Bishara J, Pitlik S, Leibovici L, Paul M Treatment of human brucellosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials BMJ 2008;336[7646]:7646-701.
47. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, onso-Coello P, et al GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 2008;336[7650]:7650-924.
48. Clarke L, Clarke M, Clarke T. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? J Health Serv Res Policy 2007;12[2]:101-3.
49. Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M,Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med 2007;4[3]:e78.
50. Atallah AN, de Silva EM, Paiva EV. Disseminating results of systematic reviews through a tv show in Brazil. Syst Rev Evid Action Int Cochrane Colloq 6th 1998, Baltimore; 2008, p. 77.
51. Oermann MH, Floyd JA, Galvin EA, Roop JC Brief reports for disseminating systematic reviews to nurses Clin Nurse Spec 2006;20[5]:5-233.
52. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283[15]:15-2008.
53. Dawes M, Sampson U Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians Int J Med Inform 2003;71[1]:1-9.
54. Glasziou P, Shepperd S. Ability to apply evidence from systematic reviews. Society for Academic Primary Care 2007;Jul 5.
55. Hartley J Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000;88[4]:4-332.
56. McDonald JW, Mahon J, Zarnke K, Feagan B, Simms L, Tucker W A randomized survey of the preference of gastroenterologists for a Cochrane review versus a traditional narrative review Can J Gastroenterol 2002;16[1]:1-17.
57. Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med ResMethodol 2008;8:21.
58. Greenhalgh T, Robert G,Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review Soc Sci Med 2005;61[2]:2-417.
59. Harden A, Thomas J. Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. Int J Social Research Methodology 2005;8: 257-71.
60. Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Doucette S, Moher D How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis Ann Intern Med 2007;147[4]:4-224.
61. Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C,Horsley T, OcampoM,Moher D. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61[6]: 531-6.
62. Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, et al A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60[11]:11-1095.
63. Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, et al. When and how to update systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;[1]:MR000023.
64. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Jungvig LK, Udani J, Spar M, Tu W, et al Effect of supplemental vitamin E for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease J Gen InternMed 2004;19[4]:4-380.
65. Lumley T Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons Stat Med 2002;21[16]:16-2313.
66. ElliottWJ,Meyer PM Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis Lancet 2007;369[9557]:9557-201.
67. Deeks J, Glanville J, Sheldon TA. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD Guidelines for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. Chichester, UK: JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd; 1996.
68. Selman TJ, Mann C, Zamora J, Appleyard TL, Khan K Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis CMAJ 2008;178[7]:7-855.
69. TMHuGE review handbook, version 1.0. [document on the Internet]. 2008. URL http://www.hugenet.ca [accessed July 30, 2008].
70. WangGY, LuCQ, ZhangRM,HuXH,LuoZW. The E-cadherin gene polymorphism 160C->A and cancer risk: a HuGE review and meta-analysis of 26 case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167[1]:7-14.
71. Altman DG Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables BMJ 2001;323[7306]:7306-224.
72. Oremus M, Raina PS, Santaguida P, Balion CM, McQueen MJ, McKelvie R, et al. A systematic review of BNP as a predictor of prognosis in persons with coronary artery disease. Clin Biochem 2007.
73. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10[Suppl 1]:21-34.
74. Greenhalgh T,Kristjansson E, RobinsonV Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes BMJ 2007;335[7625]:7625-858.