Immune and Stress Mediators in Response to Bilateral Adnexectomy: Comparison of Single-Port Access and Conventional Laparoscopy in a Porcine Model

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 837-843

  Gracia, Meritxell ^a   Sisó, Cristian ^a   Martínez Zamora, M Àngels ^a   Sarmiento, Laura ^b   Lozano, Francisco ^b   Arias, Maria Teresa ^b   Beltrán, Joan ^b   Balasch, Juan ^a   Carmona, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Animal model; Bilateral adnexectomy; Immune and stress response; Laparoscopy; Single port access

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CYTOKINE; GLUCOSE; HYDROCORTISONE; INTERLEUKIN 6; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

ACUTE PHASE RESPONSE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESS PORT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; STRESS; SURGICAL INJURY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; ANIMAL; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; OVARIECTOMY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PIG; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SALPINGECTOMY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CYTOKINES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERLEUKIN-6; LAPAROSCOPY; OVARIECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SALPINGECTOMY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SWINE; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA;

EID: 84908118606     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: 15534669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Johnson N., Barlow D., Lethaby A., Tavender E., Curr E., Garry R. . Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease [update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, 2:CD003677.
2. Pascual-Pedreño A., Perez-Medina T., Brouard Urkiaga I., Fernández-Parra J., Sobeviela-Laserrada M. Practice of endoscopic gynecologic surgery: a survey of Spanish gynecologists. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013, 169:64-68.
3. Lennard T.W., Shenton B.K., Borzotta A., et al. The influence of surgical operations on components of the human immune system. Br J Surg 1985, 72:771-776.
4. Buunen M., Gholghesaei M., Veldkamp R., Meijer D.W., Bonjer H.J., Bouvy N.D. Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:1022-1028.
5. Leung K.L., Lai P.B., Ho R.L., et al. Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2000, 231:506-511.
6. Cruickshank A.M., Fraser W.D., Burns H.J., Van Damme J., Shenkin A. Response in serum interleukin-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of varying intensity. Clin Sci 1990, 79:161-165.
7. Torres A., Torres K., Paszkowski T., Stáskiewicz G.J., Maciejewski R. Cytokine response in the postoperative period after surgical treatment of benign adnexal masses: comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy. Surg Endosc 2007, 21:1841-1848.
8. Vittimberga F.J., Foley D.P., Meyers W.C., Callery M.P. Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 1998, 227:326-334.
9. Jaberansari M.T., Róth E., Gál I., Lantos J., Varga G. Inflammatory mediators and surgical trauma regarding laparoscopic access: acute phase response. Acta Chir Hung 1997, 36:138-140.
10. Gettman M.T., Box G., Averch T., et al. Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology?. Eur Urol 2008, 53:1117-1120.
11. Murji A., Patel V.I., Leyland N., Choi M. Single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2013, 121:819-828.
12. Jackson T., Einarsson J. Single-port gynecologic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010, 3:133-139.
13. Autorino R., Cadeddu J.A., Desai M.M., et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: acritical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2011, 59:26-45.
14. Ma J., Cassera M.A., Spaum G.O., Hammill C.W., Hansen P.D., Aliabadi-Wahle S. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2011, 254:22-27.
15. Asakuma M., Hayashi M., Komeda K., et al. Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg 2011, 98:991-995.
16. Song T., Cho J., Kim T.J., et al. Cosmetic outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy compared with multi-port surgery: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013, 20:460-467.
17. Brokelman W.J., Lensvelt M., Borel Rinkes I.H., Klinkenbijl J.H., Reijnen M.M. Peritoneal changes due to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:1-9.
18. Yung S., Chan T.M. Mesothelial cells. Perit Dial Int 2007, 27(Suppl 2):S110-S115.
19. Holmdahl L., Ivarsson M.L. The role of cytokines, coagulation, and fibrinolysis in peritoneal tissue repair. Eur J Surg 1999, 165:1012-1019.
20. Tsimogiannis K.E., Tellis C.C., Tselepis A.D., et al. α-Defensins and hsCRP levels in inflammatory response of standard and laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2012, 26:627-631.
21. Greco F., Hoda M.R., Mohammed N., Springer C., Fischer K., Fomara P. Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy result in equivalent surgical trauma: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective controlled study. Eur Urol 2012, 61:1048-1053.
22. Han H.J., Choi S.B., Kim W.B., et al. Surgical stress response and clinical outcomes of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective nonrandomized study. Am Surg 2012, 78:485-491.
23. McGregor C.G., Sodergren M.H., Aslanyan A., et al. Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2011, 15:614-622.
24. Hamid J., Bancewicz J., Brown R., Ward C., Irving M.H., Ford W.L. The significance of changes in blood lymphocyte populations following surgical operations. Clin Exp Immunol 1984, 56:49-57.
25. Slade M.S., Simmons R.L., Yunis E., Greenberg L.J. Immunodepression after major surgery in normal patients. Surgery 1975, 78:363-372.
26. Baigrie R.J., Lamont P.M., Kwiatkowski D., Dallman M.J., Morris P.J. Systemic cytokine response after major surgery. Br J Surg 1992, 79:757-760.
27. Whelan R.L., Franklin M., Holubar S.D., et al. Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:972-978.
28. Pullicino E.A., Carli F., Poole S., Rafferty B., Malik S.T., Elia M. The relationship between the circulating concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and the acute phase response to elective surgery and accidental injury. Lymphokine Res 1990, 9:231-238.
29. Paul W.E. Fundamental Immunology 2003, Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
30. Ozmen M.M., Zulfikaroglu B., Col C., et al. Effect of increased abdominal pressure on cytokines (IL1 beta, IL6, TNFalpha), C-reactive protein (CRP), free radicals (NO, MDA), and histology. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009, 19:142-147.
31. Fernandez X., Meunier-Salaun M.C., Mormede P. Agonistic behavior, plasma stress hormones, and metabolites in response to dyadic encounters in domestic pigs: interrelationships and effect of dominance status. Physiol Behav 1994, 56:841-847.
32. Otten W., Puppe B., Kanitz E., Schön P.C., Stabenow B. Effects of dominance and familiarity on behaviour and plasma stress hormones in growing pigs during social confrontation. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1999, 46:277-292.
33. D'Eath R.B., Turner S.P., Kurt E., et al. Pigs' aggressive temperament affects pre-slaughter mixing aggression, stress and meat quality. Animal 2010, 4:604-616.
34. Firth A.M., Haldane S.L. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999, 214:651-659.
35. Stolzenburg J.U., Kallidonis P., Oh M.A., et al. Comparative assessment of laparoscopic single-site surgery instruments to conventional laparoscopic in laboratory setting. J Endourol 2010, 24:239-245.