Prevalence and long- Term outcome of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients with paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis

Circulation

Volumn 130, Issue 11, 2014, Pages S25-S31

  Mohty, Dania ^a   Boulogne, Cyrille ^a   Magne, Julien ^c   Pibarot, Philippe ^d   Echahidi, Najmeddine ^a   Cornu, Elisabeth ^b   Dumesnil, Jean ^d   Laskar, Marc ^b   Virot, Patrice ^a   Aboyans, Victor ^a  

^a DUPUYTREN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aortic valve stenosis; Stroke volume

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

AGED; AORTA DISEASE; AORTA PROSTHESIS; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTICLE; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DYSLIPIDEMIA; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MEDICAL ERROR; MORTALITY; PARADOXICAL LOW FLOW; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS PATIENT MISMATCH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL RATE; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; OBESITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; VERY ELDERLY; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; STROKE VOLUME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DYSLIPIDEMIAS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84908102414     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007819     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856-2864.
2. Jander N, Minners J, Holme I, Gerdts E, Boman K, Brudi P, Chambers JB, Egstrup K, Kesaniemi YA, Malbecq W, Nienaber CA, Ray S, Rossebo A, Pedersen TR, Skjaerpe T, Willenheimer R, Wachtell K, Neumann FJ, Gohlke-Barwolf C. Outcome of patients with low-gradient "severe" aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2011;123:887-895.
3. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, Davin L, O'Connor K, Rosca M, Szymanski C, Cosyns B, Piérard LA. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:235-243.
4. Adda J, Mielot C, Giorgi R, Cransac F, Zirphile X, Donal E, Sportouch- Dukhan C, Réant P, Laffitte S, Cade S, Le Dolley, Y, Thuny F, Touboul N, Lavoute C, Avierinos JF, Lancellotti P, Habib G. Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle- Tracking echocardiography: A multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:27-35.
5. Mohty D, Magne J, Deltreuil M, Aboyans V, Echahidi N, Cassat C, Pibarot P, Laskar M, Virot P. Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical lowflow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: A cardiac catheterization study. Circulation. 2013;128(11 Suppl 1):S235-S242.
6. Ozkan A, Hachamovitch R, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Marwick TH. Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation. 2013;128:622-631.
7. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:281-289.
8. Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Sénéchal M, Pibarot P. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1259-1267.
9. Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG, Pellikka PA. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation. 2013;128:1781-1789.
10. Mehrotra P, Jansen K, Flynn AW, Tan TC, Elmariah S, Picard MH, Hung J. Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction lowgradient severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1906-1914.
11. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of C, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Baron-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, Borger MA, Carrel TP, De Bonis, M, Evangelista A, Falk V, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Pierard L, Price S, Schafers HJ, Schuler G, Stepinska J, Swedberg K, Takkenberg J, Von Oppell, UO, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Zembala M. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451-2496.
12. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58:20-24.
13. Mohty D, Malouf JF, Girard SE, Schaff HV, Grill DE, Enriquez-Sarano ME, Miller FA Jr. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long- Term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation. 2006;113:420-426.
14. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, Centurini PB, Sabatini T, Amaducci A, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, Dalla Tomba M, Quaini E, Quiani E, Troise G, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:570-576.
15. Bleiziffer S, Ali A, Hettich IM, Akdere D, Laubender RP, Ruzicka D, Boehm J, Lange R, Eichinger W. Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid- Term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement. Heart. 2010;96:865-871.
16. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J. 1951;41:1-29.
17. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, Foster E, Gottdiener JS, Grayburn PA, Khandheria BK, Levine RA, Marx GR, Miller FA Jr, Nakatani S, Quiñones MA, Rakowski H, Rodriguez LL, Swaminathan M, Waggoner AD, Weissman NJ, Zabalgoitia M; American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee; Task Force on Prosthetic Valves; American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee; Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography; European Society of Cardiology; Japanese Society of Echocardiography; Canadian Society of Echocardiography; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography; European Society of Cardiology; Japanese Society of Echocardiography; Canadian Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:975-1014, quiz 1082.
18. Lauer MS, Blackstone EH, Young JB, Topol EJ. Cause of death in clinical research: Time for a reassessment? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:618-620.
19. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Adult Cardiac Surgery Data Collection- Training Manual v2.73. Available at http://www.sts.org/sts-national-database/database-managers/adult-cardiac-surgery-database/data-collection. Updated March 2014. Accessed December 2013.
20. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ, Jander N. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart. 2010;96:1463-1468.
21. Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Hueter I, Gertz ZM, Stewart WJ, Kapadia S, Tuzcu EM, Babaliaros V, Thourani V, Szeto WY, Bavaria JE, Kodali S, Hahn RT, Williams M, Miller DC, Douglas PS, Leon MB. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis. Circulation. 2013;127:2316-2326.
22. Monin JL, Quéré JP, Monchi M, Petit H, Baleynaud S, Chauvel C, Pop C, Ohlmann P, Lelguen C, Dehant P, Tribouilloy C, Guéret P. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long- Term outcome: A multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation. 2003;108:319-324.
23. Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V, Lehmann S, Garbade J, Funkat AK, Mohr FW, Gummert JF. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- And longterm outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:15-19.
24. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short- Term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108:983-988.
25. Jamieson WR, Ye J, Higgins J, Cheung A, Fradet GJ, Skarsgard P, Germann E, Chan F, Lichtenstein SV. Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long- Term survival with aortic valve replacement: Assessment to 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:51-58, discussion 59.
26. Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL, Pibarot P, Mack MJ, Takkenberg JJ, Bogers AJ, Kappetein AP. The impact of prosthesispatient mismatch on long- Term survival after aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta- Analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1518-1529.
27. Takagi H, Yamamoto H, Iwata K, Goto SN, Umemoto T. A meta- Analysis of effects of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement on late mortality. Int J Cardiol. 2012;159:150-154.
28. Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:1036-1044.
29. Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, Mathieu P, Dagenais F, Voisine P, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long- Term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:39-47.