A framework for coupling explanation and prediction in hydroecological modelling

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 61, Issue , 2014, Pages 274-286

  Surridge, Ben W J ^a   Bizzi, Simone ^b   Castelletti, Andrea ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

^c POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Causal explanation; Ecological data; Empirical prediction; Extremely randomised trees; Input variable selection; Structural equation modelling

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; FORECASTING; FORESTRY; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

CAUSAL EXPLANATIONS; ECOLOGICAL DATA; EMPIRICAL PREDICTIONS; EXTREMELY RANDOMISED TREES; INPUT VARIABLE SELECTION; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING;

PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS;

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; LEARNING; MACROINVERTEBRATE; PREDICTION;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84908095304     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Akaike H. Anew look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC 1974, 19:716-723.
2. Allen D. The relationship between variable selection and data augmentation and a method for prediction. Technometrics 1974, 16:125-127.
3. Allan D.J. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35:257-284.
4. Arhonditsis G.B., Stow C.A., Steinberg L.J., Kenney M.A., Lathrop R.C., Mcbride S.J., et al. Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis. Ecol. Model 2006, 192:385-409.
5. Arhonditsis G.B., Stow C.A., Paerl H.W., Valdes-Weaver L.M., Steinberg L.J., Reckhow K.H. Delineation of the role of nutrient dynamics and hydrologic forcing on phytoplankton patterns along a freshwater-marine continuum. Ecol. Model 2007, 208:230-246.
6. Armitage P.D., Moss D., Wright J.F., Furse M.T. The performance of a new water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Wat. Res. 1983, 17:333-347.
7. Asaeda T., Rajapakse L., Kanoh M. Fine sediment retention as affected by annual shoot collapse: sparganium erectum as an ecosystem engineer in a lowland stream. River Res. App. 2010, 26:1153-1169.
8. Begon M., Harper J.L., Townsend C.R. Ecology: Individuals, Population and Communities 1996, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
9. Bennett N.D., Croke B.F.W., Guariso G., Guillaume J.H.A., Hamilton S.H., Jakeman A.J., Marsili-Libelli S., Newham L.T.H., Norton J.P., Perrin C., Pierce S.A., Robson B., Seppelt R., Voinov A.A., Fath B.D., Andreassian V. Characterising performance of environmental models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 40:1-20.
10. Berenzen N., Schulz R., Liess M. Effects of chronic ammonium and nitrate contamination on the macroinvertebrate community in running water microcosms. Wat. Res. 2001, 35:3478-3482.
11. Bernot M.J., Sobota D.J., Hall R.O., Mulholland J.P., Dodds W.K., Webster J.R., Tank J.L., Ashkenas L.R., Cooper L.W., Dahm C.N., Gregory S.V., Grimm N.B., Hamilton S.K., Johnson S.L., McDowell W.H., Meyer J.L., Peterson B., Poole G.C., Valett H.M., Arango C., Beaulieu J.J., Burgin A.J., Crenshaw C., Helton A.M., Johnson L., Merriam J., Niederlehner B.R., O'Brien J.M., Potter J.D., Sheibley R.W., Thomas S.M., Wilson K. Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55:1874-1890.
12. Beven K.J. Amanifesto for the equifinality thesis. J.Hydrol. 2006, 320:18-36.
13. Biggs B.J.F. Patterns in benthic algae of streams. Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems 1996, 31-56. Academic Press, San Diego, California. R.J. Stevenson, M.L. Bothwell, R.L. Lowe (Eds.).
14. Biggs B.J.F. Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2000, 19:17-31.
15. Bizzi S., Surridge B.W.J., Lerner D.N. Structural equation modelling: a novel statistical framework for exploring the spatial distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in riverine ecosystems. River Res. App. 2013, 29:743-759.
16. Bollen K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables 1989, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
17. Breiman L., Friedman J., Olsen R., Stone C. Classification and Regression Trees 1984, Wadsworth International.
18. Buffagni A., Erba S., Cazzola M., Kemp J.L. The AQEM multimetric system for the southern Italian Appennines: assessing the impact of water quality and habitat degradation on pool macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean rivers. Hydrobiologia 2004, 516:313-329.
19. Burcher C.L., Valett H.M., Benfield E.F. The land-cover cascade: relationships coupling land and water. Ecology 2007, 88:228-242.
20. Castelletti A., Galelli S., Restelli M., Soncini-Sessa R. Tree-based reinforcement learning for optimal water reservoir operation. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46:W09507. 10.1029/2009WR008898.
21. Castelletti A., Galelli S., Restelli M., Soncini-Sessa R. Data-driven dynamic emulation modelling for the optimal management of environmental systems. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2012, 34:30-43.
22. Chen Q., Mynett A.E. Predicting Phaeocystis globosa bloom in Dutch coastal waters by decision trees and nonlinear piecewise regression. Ecol. Model. 2004, 176:277-290.
23. Clarke R.T., Wright J.F., Furse M.T. RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers. Ecol. Model 2003, 160:219-233.
24. Crisci C., Ghattas B., Perera G. Areview of supervised machine learning algorithms and their applications to ecological data. Ecol. Model. 2012, 240:113-122.
25. De'ath G.A. Boosted trees for ecological modelling and prediction. Ecology 2007, 88:243-251.
26. D'heygere T., Goethals P.L.M., De Pauw N. Use of genetic algorithms to select input variables in decision tree models for the prediction of benthic macroinvertebrates. Ecol. Model. 2003, 160:291-300.
27. D'heygere T., Goethals P.L.M., De Pauw N. Genetic algorithms for optimisation of predictive ecosystems models based on decision trees and neural networks. Ecol. Model. 2006, 195:20-29.
28. Dunbar M.J., Pedersen L.M., Cadman D., Extence C.A., Waddingham J., Chadd R.P., Larsen S.E. River discharge and local-scale physical habitat influence macroinvertebrate LIFE scores. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55:226-242.
29. Emery J.C., Gurnell A.M., Clifford N.J., Petts G.E. Characteristics and controls of gravel-bed riffles: an analysis of data from the river habitat survey. Water Environ. J. 2004, 18:210-216.
30. Extence C.A., Blabu D.M., Chadd R.P. River flow indexing using British benthic macroinvertebrates: a framework for setting hydroecological objectives. River Res. App. 1999, 15:543-574.
31. Feio M.J., Viana-Ferreira C., Costa C. Combining multiple machine learning algorithms to predict taxa under reference conditions for streams bioassessment. River Res. App. 2013, 10.1002/rra.2707.
32. Feld C.K., Hering D. Community structure or function: effects of environmental stress on benthic macroinvertebrates at different spatial scales. Freshw. Biol. 2007, 52:1380-1399.
33. Fonteneau R., Wehenkel L., Ernst D. Variable selection for dynamic treatment regimes: a reinforcement learning approach. Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Reinforcement Learning, 2008 2008.
34. Fornarelli R., Galelli S., Castelletti A., Antenucci J.P., Marti C.L. An empirical modeling approach to predict and understand phytoplankton dynamics in a reservoir affected by inter-basin water transfers. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49:3626-3641. 10.1002/wrcr.20268.
35. Friberg N., Skriver J., Larsen S.E., Pedersen M.L., Buffagni A. Stream macroinvertebrate occurrence along gradients in organic pollution and eutrophication. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55:1405-1419.
36. Frissell C.A., Liss W.L., Warren C.E., Hurley M.D. Ahierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ. Manage. 1986, 10:199-214.
37. Galelli S., Castelletti A. Tree-based iterative input variable selection for hydrological modelling. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 10.1002/wrcr.20339.
38. Galelli S., Castelletti A. Assessing the predictive capability of randomized tree-based ensembles in streamflow modelling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17:1-6.
39. Geurts P., Ernst D., Wehenkel L. Extremely randomised trees. Mach. Learn. 2006, 63:3-42.
40. Geurts P., Irrthum A., Wehenkel L. Supervised learning with decision tree-based methods in computational and systems biology. Mol. Biosyst. 2009, 5:1593-1605.
41. Goethals P.L.M., Dedecker A.P., Gabriels W., Lek S., De Pauw N. Applications of artificial neural networks predicting macroinvertebrates in freshwaters. Aquat. Ecol. 2007, 41:491-508.
42. Golubkov S.M., Tiunova T.M., Kocharina S.L. Dependence of the respiration rate of aquatic insects upon the oxygen concentration in running and still water. Aquat. Insects 1992, 14:137-144.
43. Grace J.B. Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems 2006, Cambridge University Press.
44. Grace J.B., Keeley J.E. Astructural equation model analysis of postfire plant diversity in California shrublands. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16:503-514.
45. Grace J.B., Pugesek B.H. Astructural equation model of plant species richness and its application to a coastal wetland. Am. Nat. 1997, 149:436-460.
46. Grace J.B., Anderson M.T., Olff H., Scheiner S.M. On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. Ecol. Monog. 2010, 80:67-87.
47. Graham M.H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 2003, 84:2809-2815.
48. Gurnell A.M., Van Oosterhout M.P., De Vlieger B., Goodson J.M. Reach-scale interactions between aquatic plants and physical habitat: river Frome. Dorset. River Res. App. 2006, 22:667-680.
49. Guyon I., Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J.Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3:1157-1182.
50. Hägglund G. Milestones in the history of factor analysis. Structural Equation Modelling: Present and Future 2001, 11-38. Scientific Software International, Licolnwood Illinois. R. Cudeck, S.H.C. Du Toit, D. Sörbom (Eds.).
51. Hoang T.H., Lock K., Mouton A., Goethals P.L.M. Application of classification trees and support vector machines to model the presence of macroinvertebrates in rivers in Vietnam. Ecol. Inf. 2010, 5:140-146.
52. Iriondo J.M., Albert M.J., Escudero A. Structural equation modelling: an alternative for assessing causal relationships in threatened plant populations. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 113:367-377.
53. Jakeman A., Hornberger G. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29:2637-2649.
54. Jowett I. Hydraulic constraints on habitat suitability for benthic invertebrates in gravel-bed rivers. River Res. App. 2003, 19:495-507.
55. Jung N.C., Popescu I., Kelderman P., Solomatine D.P., Price R.K. Application of model trees and other machine learning techniques for algal growth prediction in Yongdam reservoir, Republic of Korea. J.Hydroinf. 2010, 12:262-274.
56. Karl D.M. Phosphorus, the staff of life. Nature 2000, 406:31-33.
57. Kelly M., Juggins S., Guthrie S., Pritchard R., Jamieson S., Ripley B., Hirst H., Yallop M. Assessment of ecological status in UK rivers using diatoms. Freshw. Biol. 2008, 53:403-422.
58. Kocev D., Džeroski S., White M.D., Newell G.R., Griffioen P. Using single- and multi-target regression trees and ensembles to model a compound index of vegetation condition. Ecol. Model 2009, 220:1159-1168.
59. Kocev D., Naumoski A., Mitreski K., Krstić A., Džeroski S. Learning habitat models for the diatom community in Lake Prespa. Ecol. Model 2010, 221:330-337.
60. Kokes J., Zahràdkova S., Nemejcova D., Hodovsky J., Jarkovsky J., Soldan T. The PERLA system in the Czech Republic: a multivariate approach for assessing the ecological status of running waters. Hydrobiologia 2006, 566:343-354.
61. Lawton J.H. Are there general laws in ecology?. Oikos 1999, 84:177-192.
62. Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical Ecology 1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
63. Lorenz A.W., Hering D., Feld C.K., Rolauffs P. Anew method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of five German stream types. Hydrobiologia 2004, 516:107-127.
64. Lücke J.D., Johnson R.K. Detection of ecological change in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages using single metric, multimetric or multivariate approaches. Ecol. Indic. 2009, 9:659-669.
65. Maddock I. The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshw. Biol. 1999, 41:373-391.
66. Maier H.R., Jain A., Dandy G.C., Sudheer K.P. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:891-909.
67. Monk W.A., Wood P.J., Hannah D.M., Wilson D.A. Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change. River Res. App. 2007, 23:113-122.
68. Mouton A.M., De Baets B., Goethals P.L.M. Knowledge-based versus data-driven fuzzy habitat suitability models for river management. Environ. Modell. Soft. 2009, 24:982-993.
69. Mouton A.M., Dedecker A.P., Lek S., Goethals P.L.M. Selecting variables for habitat suitability of Asellus (Crustacea, Isopoda) by applying input variable contribution methods to artificial neural network models. Environ. Model. Assess. 2010, 15:65-79.
70. Mulholland J.P., Fellows C.S., Tank J.L., Grimm N.B., Webster J.R., Hamilton S.K., Martí E., Ashkenas L., Bowden W.B., Dodds W.K., McDowell W.H., Paul M.J., Peterson B.J. Inter-biome comparison of factors controlling stream metabolism. Freshw. Biol. 2009, 46:1503-1517.
71. Murphy J.F., Davy-Bowker J. Spatial structure in lotic macroinvertebrate communities in England and Wales. Relationships with physical,chemical and anthropogenic stress variables. Hydrobiologia 2005, 534:151-164.
72. Murray-Bligh J. Procedures for Collecting and Analysing Macroinvertebrate Samples 1999, Environment Agency, Bristol.
73. Newson M.D., Newson C.L. Geomoprhology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Prog. Phys. Geog. 2000, 24:195-217.
74. Palmer M., Menninger H.L., Bernhardt E. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice?. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55:205-222.
75. Parsons M., Thoms M.C., Norris R.H. Scales of macroinvertebrate distribution in relation to the hierarchical organization of river systems. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2003, 22:105-122.
76. Pianosi F., Castelletti A., Restelli M. Tree-based fitted Q-iteration for multi-objective Markov decision processes in water resource management. J.Hydroinf. 2013, 15:258-270.
77. Poff N.L., Pyne M.I., Bledzoe B.P., Cuhaciyan C.C., Carlisle D.M. Developing linkages between species traits and multiscaled environmental variation to explore vulnerability of stream benthic communities to climate change. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2010, 29:1441-1458.
78. Poff N.L., Ward J.V. Physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environ. Manage. 1990, 14:629-645.
79. Raven P.J., Holmes N.T.H., Dawson F.H., Everard M. Quality assessment using river habitat survey data. Aquat. Conserv. 1998, 8:477-499.
80. Reckhow K.H., Arhonditsis G.B., Kenney M.A., Hauser L., Tribo J., Wu C., Elcock K.J., Steinberg L.J., Stow C.A., McBride S.J. Apredictive approach to nutrient criteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:2913-2919.
81. Sandin L. Benthic macroinvertebrates in Swedish streams: community structure, taxon richness, and environmental relations. Ecography 2003, 26:269-282.
82. Sandin L., Hering D. Comparing macroinvertebrate indices to detect organic pollution across Europe: a contribution to the EC Water Framework Directive intercalibration. Hydrobiologia 2004, 516:55-68.
83. Sandin L., Johnson R.K. Ecoregions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages of Swedish streams. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2000, 19:462-474.
84. Shan Y., Paull D., McKay R.I. Machine learning of poorly predictable ecological data. Ecol. Model 2006, 195:129-138.
85. Shipley B. Cause and Correlation in Biology 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
86. Simpson J.C., Norris R.H. Biological assessment of river quality: development of AusRivAS models and outputs. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters 2000, 125-142. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK. J.F. Wright, J.W. Sutcliffe, M.T. Furse (Eds.).
87. Shmueli G. To explain or to predict?. Stat. Sci. 2010, 25:289-310.
88. Smith V.H., Schindler D.W. Eutrophication science: where do we go from here?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:201-207.
89. ter Braak C.J.E., Verdonschot P.M.E. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 1995, 57:255-289.
90. Tirelli T., Pozzi L., Pessani D. Use of different approaches to model presence/absence of Salmo marmoratus in Piedmont (Northwestern Italy). Ecol. Inf. 2009, 4:234-242.
91. Tirelli T., Pessani D. Importance of feature selection in decision-tree and artificial-neural-network ecological applications. Alburnus alburnus alborella: a practical example. Ecol. Inf. 2011, 6:309-315.
92. Townsend C.R., Doledec S., Norris R.H., Peacock K., Arbuckle C. The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshw. Biol. 2003, 48:768-785.
93. Vaughan I.P., Ormerod S.J. The continuing challenges of testing species distribution and models. J.Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42:720-730.
94. Vaughan I.P., Ormerod S.J. Linking ecological and hydromorphological data: approaches, challenges and future prospects for riverine science. Aquat. Conserv. 2010, 20:S125-S130.
95. Vaughan I.P., Ormerod S.J. Large-scale, long-term trends in British river macroinvertebrates. Glob. Change. Biol. 2012, 18:2184-2194.
96. Wall M.M., Amemiya Y. Estimation for polynomial structural equation models. J.Am. Stat. Assoc. 2000, 95:925-940.
97. Wan Jaafar W.Z., Liu J., Han D. Input variable selection for median flood regionalization. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47. 10.1029/2011WR010436.
98. Wehenkel L. Automatic Learning Techniques in Power Systems 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
99. Weiher E., Forbes S., Schauwecker T., Grace J.B. Multivariate control of plant species richness and community biomass in blackland prairie. Oikos 2004, 106:151-157.
100. Wiens J.A. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw. Biol. 2002, 47:501-515.
101. Williams K.A., Green D.W.J., Pascoe D. Studies on the acute toxicity of pollutants to freshwater macroinvertebrates. 3. Ammon. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1986, 106:61-70.
102. Willmott C.J. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. B.Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1982, 63:1309-1313.
103. Winklemann C., Hellmann C., Worischka S., Petzoldt T., Benndorf J. Fish predation affects the structure of a benthic community. Freshw. Biol. 2011, 56:1030-1046.
104. Wright J.F. An introduction to RIVPACS. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters 2000, 125-142. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK. J.F. Wright, J.W. Sutcliffe, M.T. Furse (Eds.).
105. Wright J.F., Sutcliffe J.W., Furse M.T. Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters 2000, Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK.
106. Young P.C. Hypothetico-inductive data-based mechanistic modeling of hydrological systems. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49:915-935.