Effects of Simulation-Based Training in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1611-1623.e4

  Singh, Siddharth ^a   Sedlack, Robert E ^a   Cook, David A ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

CI; Education; EGD; ERCP; ES; Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Outcomes; SBT; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER; DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPE; EFFECT SIZE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION; SIMULATION BASED TRAINING; SIMULATOR; SKILL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC;

EID: 84908094466     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: 15427714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.01.037     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Sedlack R.E. The state of simulation in endoscopy education: continuing to advance toward our goals. Gastroenterology 2013, 144:9-12.
2. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in gastroenterology (internal medicine) section IV.A.6.b. Available at: . Accessed June 30,2013. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/2013-PR-FAQ-PIF/144_gastroenterology_int_med_07132013.pdf.
3. Sturm L.P., Windsor J.A., Cosman P.H., et al. Asystematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 2008, 248:166-179.
4. Gerson L.B. Evidence-based assessment of endoscopic simulators for training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006, 16:489-509.
5. Walsh C.M., Sherlock M.E., Ling S.C., et al. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 6:CD008237.
6. Cook D.A., Hatala R., Brydges R., et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011, 306:978-988.
7. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:264-269.
8. Desilets D.J., Banerjee S., Barth B.A., et al. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:861-867.
9. Baillie J. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography simulation. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006, 16:529-542.
10. Cohen J. The first International Conference on Endoscopy Simulation: consensus statement. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006, 16:583-591.
11. Kefalides P.T., Gress F. Simulator training for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006, 16:543-552.
12. Matthes K. Simulator training in endoscopic hemostasis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006, 16:511-527.
13. Sedlack R.E. Simulators in training: defining the optimal role for various simulation models in the training environment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006, 16:553-563.
14. Williams C.B., Thomas-Gibson S. Rational colonoscopy, realistic simulation, and accelerated teaching. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006, 16:457-470.
15. Sutherland L.M., Middleton P.F., Anthony A., et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2006, 243:291-300.
16. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
17. Reed D.A., Cook D.A., Beckman T.J., et al. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA 2007, 298:1002-1009.
18. Cook D.A., Levinson A.J., Garside S., et al. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008, 300:1181-1196.
19. Cook D.A., Hamstra S.J., Brydges R., et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 2013, 35:e867-e898.
20. Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327:557-560.
21. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
22. Issenberg S.B., McGaghie W.C., Petrusa E.R., et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005, 27:10-28.
23. Kiesslich R., Moenk S., Reinhardt K., et al. Combined simulation training: a new concept and workshop is useful for crisis management in gastrointestinal endoscopy [German]. ZGastroenterol 2005, 43:1031-1039.
24. Sedlack R.E. Validation of computer simulation training for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: pilot study. JGastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 22:1214-1219.
25. Mahmood T., Darzi A. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:1224-1230.
26. Thomas-Gibson S., Bassett P., Suzuki N., et al. Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term. Endoscopy 2007, 39:818-824.
27. Gerson L.B., Van Dam J. Aprospective randomized trial comparing a virtual reality simulator to bedside teaching for training in sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy 2003, 35:569-575.
28. Haycock A., Koch A.D., Familiari P., et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 71:298-307.
29. Kruglikova I., Grantcharov T.P., Drewes A.M., et al. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2010, 59:181-185.
30. Walsh C.M., Ling S.C., Wang C.S., et al. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med 2009, 84(Suppl):S54-S57.
31. Hochberger J., Euler K., Naegel A., et al. The compact Erlangen Active Simulator for interventional endoscopy: a prospective comparison in structured team-training courses on 'endoscopic hemostasis' for doctors and nurses. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004, 39:895-902.
32. Buzink S.N., Goossens R.H.M., Schoon E.J., et al. Do basic psychomotor skills transfer between different image-based procedures?. World J Surg 2010, 34:933-940.
33. Kennedy C.C., Maldonado F., Cook D.A. Simulation-based bronchoscopy training: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2013, 144:183-192.
34. Skolarikos A., Gravas S., Laguna M.P., et al. Training in ureteroscopy: a critical appraisal of the literature. BJU Int 2011, 108:798-805.
35. Zendejas B., Brydges R., Hamstra S.J., et al. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2013, 257:586-593.
36. Cook D.A., Brydges R., Hamstra S.J., et al. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 2012, 7:308-320.
37. Hatala R., Cook D.A., Zendejas B., et al. Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014, 19:251-272.
38. Cook D.A., Brydges R., Zendejas B., et al. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2013, 88:1178-1186.
39. Cook D.A. If you teach them, they will learn: why medical education needs comparative effectiveness research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012, 17:305-310.
40. Hamstra S.J., Brydges R., Hatala R., et al. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training: a critique based on evidence from a systematic review. Acad Med 2014, 89:387-392.
41. Tuggy M.L. Virtual reality flexible sigmoidoscopy simulator training: impact on resident performance. JAm Board Fam Pract 1998, 11:426-433.
42. Ferlitsch A., Glauninger P., Gupper A., et al. Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2002, 34:698-702.
43. Kneebone R.L., Nestel D., Moorthy K., et al. Learning the skills of flexible sigmoidoscopy-the wider perspective. Med Educ 2003, 37(Suppl 1):50-58.
44. Neumann M., Hahn C., Horbach T., et al. Score card endoscopy: a multicenter study to evaluate learning curves in 1-week courses using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer. Endoscopy 2003, 35:515-520.
45. Neumann M., Siebert T., Rausch J., et al. Scorecard endoscopy: a pilot study to assess basic skills in trainees for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Langenbeck Arch Surg 2003, 387:386-391.
46. Di Giulio E., Fregonese D., Casetti T., et al. Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills required for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:196-200.
47. Eversbusch A., Grantcharov T.P. Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:1514-1518.
48. Sedlack R.E., Kolars J.C., Alexander J.A. Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:348-352.
49. Sedlack R.E., Kolars J.C. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:33-37.
50. Ahlberg G., Hultcrantz R., Jaramillo E., et al. Virtual reality colonoscopy simulation: a compulsory practice for the future colonoscopist?. Endoscopy 2005, 37:1198-1204.
51. Hochberger J., Matthes K., Maiss J., et al. Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:204-215.
52. Matthes K., Cohen J., Kochman M.L., et al. Efficacy and costs of a one-day hands-on EASIE endoscopy simulator train-the-trainer workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:921-927.
53. Neumann M., Meining A., Buerschaper C., et al. Training in GI endoscopy: can we objectively predict the performance of trainees? A prospective correlation study. ZGastroenterol 2005, 43:445-450.
54. Cohen J., Cohen S.A., Vora K.C., et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 64:361-368.
55. Maiss J., Prat F., Wiesnet J., et al. The complementary Erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy training is superior to solely clinical education in endoscopic hemostasis-the French training project. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 18:1217-1225.
56. Ritter E.M., McClusky D.A., Gallagher A.G., et al. Perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor abilities correlate with duration of training required on a virtual-reality flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 2006, 192:379-384.
57. Thomson M., Heuschkel R., Donaldson N., et al. Acquisition of competence in paediatric ileocolonoscopy with virtual endoscopy training. JPediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006, 43:699-701.
58. Buzink S.N., Koch A.D., Heemskerk J., et al. Acquiring basic endoscopy skills by training on the GI Mentor II. Surg Endosc 2007, 21:1996-2003.
59. ® is a feasible training model for endoscopic novices: a prospective randomised trial. Dig Liver Dis 2007, 39:70-78.
60. Park J., MacRae H., Musselman L.J., et al. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients. Am J Surg 2007, 194:205-211.
61. Yi SY, Ryu KH, Woo HS, etal. Quantitative analysis of colonoscopy skills using the KAIST-Ewha Colonoscopy Simulator II. Frontiers in the Convergence of Bioscience and Information Technologies 2007; . http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FBIT.2007.58.
62. Shirai Y., Yoshida T., Shiraishi R., et al. Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. JGastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 23:1046-1050.
63. Yi S.Y., Ryu K.H., Na Y.J., et al. Improvement of colonoscopy skills through simulation-based training. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008, 132:565-567.
64. Haycock A.V., Youd P., Bassett P., et al. Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 70:835-845.
65. Yi S.Y., Ryu K.H., Woo H.S., et al. Sectional analysis of learning on the KAIST-Ewha Colonoscopy Simulation II. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009, 142:432-434.
66. Ferlitsch A., Schoefl R., Puespoek A., et al. Effect of virtual endoscopy simulator training on performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2010, 42:1049-1056.
67. Haycock A.V., East J.E., Swain D., et al. Development of a novel esophageal stricture simulation. Dig Dis Sci 2010, 55:321-327.
68. Kruglikova I., Grantcharov T.P., Drewes A.M., et al. Assessment of early learning curves among nurses and physicians using a high-fidelity virtual-reality colonoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:366-370.
69. Luursema J.M., Buzink S.N., Verwey W.B., et al. Visuo-spatial ability in colonoscopy simulator training. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010, 15:685-694.