Simulator Training for Endoscopic Ultrasound

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 543-552

  Kefalides, Paul T ^a   Gress, Frank ^b  

^a Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTERNET; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SKILL; TELECONFERENCE; TELEMEDICINE; TRAINING; ULTRASOUND; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, ANIMAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33746271271     PISSN: 10525157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2006.03.018     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Rosch T. EUS training in Europe. Endoscopy 30 Suppl 1 (1998) A18
2. Eloubeidi M.A., and Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 61 6 (2005) 700-708
3. Gerson L.B., and Van Dam J. A prospective randomized trial comparing a virtual reality simulator to bedside teaching for training in sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy 35 7 (2003) 569-575
4. Lightdale C.J. EUS training in the USA. Endoscopy 30 Suppl 1 (1998) A19-A21
5. Ganesana NM, Bruno JM, Jang S, et al. Can an endoscopic simulator determine who is competent to perform ERCP? Presented at Digestive Diseases Week. Chicago, May 18-22, 2005.
6. Gastrointestinal endosonography. 1st Version (2001), Olympus, Columbia (SC)
7. Linear endosonography video atlas. 1st Version (2002), Pentax, Boston
8. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. Visible human journal of endoscopy. Available at: http://www.vhjoe.com. Accessed November 15, 2005.
9. Gumustop B., Zafar N.B., Breslin N., et al. Endosonography simulation using visual human data sets. Gastrointest Endosc 53 5 (2001) AB109
10. Felsher J.J., Olesevich M., Farres H., et al. Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 189 4 (2005) 497-500
11. Mahmood T., and Darzi A. A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17 10 (2003) 1583-1589
12. Di Giulio E., Fregonese D., Casetti T., et al. Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills required for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 60 2 (2004) 196-200
13. Bhutani M.S., Hoffman B.J., and Hawes R.H. A swine model for teaching endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging and intervention under EUS guidance. Endoscopy 30 7 (1998) 605-609
14. Bhutani M.S., Aveyard M., and Stills Jr. H.F. Improved model for teaching interventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 52 3 (2000) 400-403
15. Hochberger J., Matthes K., Maiss J., et al. Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone. Gastrointest Endosc 61 2 (2005) 204-215
16. Matsuda K. How shall we experience endoscopic ultrasound before the actual first procedure? Development of a modified Erlanger Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE) model for endoscopic ultrasound training. Gastrointest Endosc 56 4 Suppl (2002) A1
17. Sorbi D., Vazquez-Sequeiros E., and Wiersema M.J. A simple phantom for learning EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 57 4 (2003) 580-583