Motivated Happiness: Self-Enhancement Inflates Self-Reported Subjective Well-Being

Social Psychological and Personality Science

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 825-834

  Wojcik, Sean P ^a   Ditto, Peter H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

judgment and decision making; self evaluation; self presentation; social comparison; well being

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908086711     PISSN: 19485506     EISSN: 19485514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1948550614534699     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alicke M. D.Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985;49:1621
2. Beer J. S.,Chester D. S.,Hughes B. L.Social threat and cognitive load magnify self-enhancement and attenuate self-deprecation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;4:706-711
3. Brooks A. C.Gross national happiness: Why happiness matters for America—And how we can get more of it. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2008:
4. Brown J. D.Understanding the “Better than Average” effect: Motives (still) matter.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012;38:209-219
5. Brown J. D.,Kobayashi C.Self-enhancement in Japan and America.Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2002;5:145-168
6. Chambers J. R.,Windschitl P. D.Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects.Psychological Bulletin. 2004;130:813-838
7. Church A. T.,Katigbak M. S.,del Prado A. M.,Valdez-Medina J. L.,Miramontes L. G.,Ortiz F. A.A cross-cultural study of trait self-enhancement, explanatory variables, and adjustment.Journal of Research in Personality. 2006;40:1169-1201
8. Colvin C. R.,Block J.,Funder D. C.Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;68:1152-1162
9. Cross K. P.Not can, but will college teaching be improved?.New Directions for Higher Education. 1977;17:1-15
10. Diener E.Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.American Psychologist. 2000;55:34-43
11. Diener E.Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being.Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2006;1:151-157
12. Diener E.,Diener C.Most people are happy.Psychological Science. 1996;7:181-185
13. Diener E.,Sandvik E.,Pavot W.,Gallagher D.Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being.Social Indicators Research. 1991;24:35-56
14. Diener E.,Suh E. M.Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000:
15. Dolan P.,Peasgood T.,White M.Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being.Journal of Economic Psychology. 2008;29:94-122
16. Dunning D.,Meyerowitz J. A.,Holzberg A. D.Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;57:1082-1090
17. Ekman P.,Davidson R. J.,Friesen W. V.The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;58:342-353
18. Gruber J.,Mauss I. B.,Tamir M.A dark side of happiness? How, when, and why happiness is not always good.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:222-233
19. Harker L.,Keltner D.Expressions of positive emotion in women's college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;80:112-124
20. Jordan C. H.,Spencer S. J.,Zanna M. P.,Hoshino-Browne E.,Correll J.Secure and defensive high self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85:969-978
21. Kernis M. H.Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem.Psychological Inquiry. 2003;14:1-26
22. Kim H.,Schimmack U.,Oishi S.Cultural differences in self- and other-evaluations and well-being: A study of European and Asian Canadians.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012;102:856-873
23. Klar Y.,Giladi E. E.Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy?.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999;25:586-595
24. Kozma A.,Stones M. J.Social desirability in measures of subjective well-being: Age comparisons.Social Indicators Research. 1988;20:1-14
25. Kurt A.,Paulhus D. L.Moderators of the adaptiveness of self-enhancement: Operationalization, motivational domain, adjustment facet, and evaluator.Journal of Research in Personality. 2008;42:839-853
26. Kwan V. S.,John O. P.,Kenny D. A.,Bond M. H.,Robins R. W.Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach.Psychological Review. 2004;111:94-110
27. Lanyon R. I.,Carle A. C.Internal and external validity of scores on the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding and the Paulhus Deception Scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2007;67:859-876
28. Lyubomirsky S.,King L.,Diener E.The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?.Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131:803-855
29. Okun M. A.,Stock W. A.,Haring M. J.,Witter R. A.Health and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis.The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 1984;19:111-132
30. Paulhus D. L.Measures of personality and social attitudes. Robinson J. P.Shaver P. R.Wrightsman L. S., ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1991:17-59.
31. Paulhus D. L.Balanced inventory of desirable responding: Reference manual for BIDR Version 6. 1994:
32. Paulhus D. L.,John O. P.Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives.Journal of Personality. 1998;66:1025-1060
33. Pavot W.,Diener E.Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.Psychological Assessment. 1993;5:164-172
34. Rusbult C. E.,Van Lange P. A.,Wildschut T.,Yovetich N. A.,Verette J.Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;79:521-545
35. Sandvik E.,Diener E.,Seidlitz L.Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures.Journal of Personality. 1993;61:317-342
36. Schneider D. J.,Turkat D.Self-presentation following success or failure: Defensive self-esteem models.Journal of Personality. 1975;43:127-135
37. Schwarz N.Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.American Psychologist. 1999;54:93-105
38. Shedler J.,Mayman M.,Manis M.The illusion of mental health.American Psychologist. 1993;48:1117-1131
39. Svenson O.Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?.Acta Psychologica. 1981;47:143-148
40. Taylor S. E.,Brown J. D.Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103:193-210
41. Taylor S. E.,Lerner J. S.,Sherman D. K.,Sage R. M.,McDowell N. K.Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003a;85:605-615
42. Taylor S. E.,Lerner J. S.,Sherman D. K.,Sage R. M.,McDowell N. K.Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003b;84:165-176
43. Vautier S.,Bonnefon J. F.Is the above-average effect measurable at all? The validity of the self-reported happiness minus others' perceived happiness construct.Applied Psychological Measurement. 2008;32:575-584
44. Veenhoven R.,Ehrhardt J.The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness.Social Indicators Research. 1995;34:33-68
45. Walker S. S.,Schimmack U.Validity of a happiness implicit association test as a measure of subjective well-being.Journal of Research in Personality. 2008;42:490-497
46. World Values Surveys. (2006). European and world values surveys four-wave integrated data file, 1981–2004, v.20060423. Retrieved September 12, 2013, fromhttp://www.wvsevsdb.com/wvs/WVSData.jsp
47. Zou C.,Schimmack U.,Gere J.The validity of well-being measures: A multiple-indicator-multiple-rater model.Psychological Assessment. 2013;25:1247-1254