Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 830-835

  Lu, Chien Hsing ^b   Liu, Fu Shing ^b   Kuo, Chian Jue ^b   Chang, Cha Che ^b   Ho, Esther Shih Chu ^a  

^a TAICHUNG VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CURETTAGE; CYTOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; AGE DISTRIBUTION; CANCER STAGING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; TUMOR RECURRENCE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33646078922     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206777.28541.fc     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arends MJ, Buckley CH, Wells M. Aetiology, pathogenesis, and pathology of cervical neoplasia. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:96-103.
2. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, Ferris DG, Jenkins D, Schuind A, et al. Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364):1757-65.
3. Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993;12:186-92.
4. Lu CH, Liu FS, Tseng JJ, Ho ES. Predictive factors for residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for CIN III. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:284-8.
5. Ferenczy A. Electroconization of the cervix with a fine-needle electrode. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:152-9.
6. Mohamed Noor K, Quinn MA, Tan J. Outcomes after cervical cold knife conization with complete and incomplete excision of abnormal epithelium: a review of 699 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1997;67:34-8.
7. Husseinzadeh N, Shbaro I, Wesseler T. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1989;33:198-200.
8. Moore BC, Higgins RV, Laurent SL, Marroum MC, Bellitt P. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy [see comments]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:361-6.
9. Paterson-Brown S, Chappatte OA, Clark SK, Wright A, Maxwell P, Taub NA. The significance of cone biopsy resection margins. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46:182-5.
10. Houlard S, Perrotin F, Fourquet F, Marret H, Lansac J, Body G. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;104:144-7.
11. Shingleton HM, Orr JW Jr. Cancer of the Cervix: Screening. Philadelphia (PA): JB Lippincott Company; 1995. p 18.
12. Kalogirou D, Antoniou G, Karakitsos P, Botsis D, Kalogirou O, Giannikos L. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1997;18:113-6.
13. Vierhout ME, de Planque PM. Concomitant endocervical curettage and cervical conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70:359-61.
14. Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:996-1000.
15. Kobak WH, Roman LD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Schlaerth JB, Morrow CP. The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:197-201.
16. Demopoulos RI, Horowitz LF, Vamvakas EC. Endocervical gland involvement by cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: predictive value for residual and/or recurrent disease. Cancer 1991;68:1932-6.
17. Narducci F, Occelli B, Boman F, Vinatier D, Loroy JL. Positive margins after conization and risk of persistent lesion. Gynecol Oncol 2000;76:311-4.
18. Livasy CA, Maygarden SJ, Rajaratnam CT, Novotny DB. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement. Mod Pathol 1999;12:233-8.
19. Gardeil F, Barry-Walsh C, Prendiville W, Clinch J, Turner MJ. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:419-22.