Clinical outcomes of cases with absent cervical dysplasia in cold knife conization specimens

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 6693-6696

  Baser, Eralp ^a   Ozgu, Emre ^a   Erkilinc, Selcuk ^a   Yalcin, Hakan ^a   Cetinkaya, Nilufer ^a   Sirvan, Levent ^a   Erkaya, Salim ^a   Gungor, Tayfun ^a  

^a ZEKAI TAHIR BURAK WOMEN S HEALTH EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cold knife conization; Human papillomavirus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CRYOSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION;

ADULT; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONIZATION; CRYOSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84922322207     PISSN: 15137368     EISSN: 2476762X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.11.6693     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Apgar BS, Kaufman AJ, Bettcher C, Parker-Featherstone E (2013). Gynecologic procedures: colposcopy, treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and endometrial assessment. Am Fam Physician, 87, 836-43.
2. Diakomanolis E, Haidopoulos D, Chatzipapas I, et al (2003). Negative cone biopsies. A reappraisal. J Reprod Med, 48, 617-21.
3. Golbang P, Scurry J, De Jong S, et al (1997). Investigation of 100 consecutive negative cone biopsies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 104, 100-4.
4. Jancar N, Rakar S, Poljak M, et al (2006). Efficiency of three surgical procedures in eliminating high-risk human papillomavirus infection in women with precancerous cervical lesions. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 27, 239-42.
5. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 61, 69-90.
6. Koc N, Sahin D, Ayas S (2013). Reevaluation of negative cone biopsy results after a positive cervical biopsy finding. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 17, 154-9.
7. Montz FJ (2000). Management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and potential complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 43, 394-409.
8. MurtaEF, Silva AO, Silva EA (2006). Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 27, 50-2.
9. Rodriguez-Manfredi A, Alonso I, Del Pino M, et al (2013). Predictors of absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the conization specimen. Gynecol Oncol, 128, 271-6.
10. Vink MA, Bogaards JA, Van Kemenade FJ, et al (2013). Clinical progression of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: estimating the time to preclinical cervical cancer from doubly censored national registry data. Am J Epidemiol, [Epub ahead of print].
11. Weigl G, Pokieser W, Schuller B, et al (2006). Investigation of 208 consecutive cases of cervical cone biopsies with regard to indication, negative samples and quality control. Acta Cytol, 50, 185-90.