Differences in social interaction- vs. cocaine reward in mouse vs. rat

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue OCT, 2014, Pages 1-7

  Kummer, Kai K ^a   Hofhansel, Lena ^a   Barwitz, Constanze M ^a   Schardl, Aurelia ^a   Prast, Janine M ^a   Salti, Ahmad ^a   El Rawas, Rana ^a   Zernig, Gerald ^a,b  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Addiction; Alternative reward; BL 6 mouse; C57; Cocaine; Conditioned place preference; Dyadic social interaction; Sprague Dawley rat; Substance use disorder

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AVERSION; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN NERVE CELL; BRAIN REGION; CELL POPULATION; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; MALE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PLACE PREFERENCE; RAT; REWARD; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SPECIES COMPARISON; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 84907997796     PISSN: 16625153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00363     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aston-Jones, G., and Deisseroth, K. (2013). Recent advances in optogenetics and pharmacogenetics. Brain Res.1511, 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.01.026
2. Barnett, S. A. (1975). The rat: a study in behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Benuck, M., Lajtha, A., and Reith, M. E. (1987). Pharmacokinetics of systemically administered cocaine and locomotor stimulation in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 243, 144-149.
4. El Rawas, R., Klement, S., Kummer, K. K., Fritz, M., Dechant, G., Saria, A., et al. (2012). Brain regions associated with the acquisition of conditioned place preference for cocaine vs. social interaction. Front. Behav. Neurosci.6:63. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00063
5. Felix-Ortiz, A. C., and Tye, K. M. (2014). Amygdala inputs to the ventral hippocampus bidirectionally modulate social behavior. J. Neurosci. 34, 586-595. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4257-13.2014
6. Fritz, M., El Rawas, R., Klement, S., Kummer, K., Mayr, M. J., Eggart, V., et al. (2011a). Differential effects of accumbens core vs. shell lesions in a rat concurrent conditioned place preference paradigm for cocaine vs. social interaction. PLoS One 6:e26761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026761
7. Fritz, M., El Rawas, R., Salti, A., Klement, S., Bardo, M. T., Kemmler, G., et al. (2011b). Reversal of cocaine-conditioned place preference and mesocorticolimbic Zif268 expression by social interaction in rats. Addict. Biol.16, 273-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00285.x
8. Grawe, K., Donati, R., and Bernauer, F. (1994). Psychotherapie im Wandel: von der Konfession zur Profession. Göttingen; Seattle: Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie.
9. Gunaydin, L. A., Grosenick, L., Finkelstein, J. C., Kauvar, I. V., Fenno, L. E., Adhikari, A., et al. (2014). Natural neural projection dynamics underlying social behavior. Cell 157, 1535-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.017
10. Johnson, M. (2012). Laboratory mice and rats. Mater. Methods 2:113. [Online] doi: 10.13070/mm.en.2.113
11. Kasahara, M., Groenink, L., Bijlsma, E. Y., Olivier, B., and Sarnyai, Z. (2014). Lifelong, central corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) overexpression is associated with individual differences in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Eur. J. Pharmacol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.050. [Epub ahead of print].
12. Kreitzer, A. C. (2009). Physiology and pharmacology of striatal neurons. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 127-147. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135422
13. Kummer, K., Klement, S., Eggart, V., Mayr, M. J., Saria, A., and Zernig, G. (2011). Conditioned place preference for social interaction in rats: contribution of sensory components. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:80. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00080
14. Lee, H. M., Giguere, P. M., and Roth, B. L. (2014). DREADDs: novel tools for drug discovery and development. Drug Discov. Today 19, 469-473. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.10.018
15. Legerstee, M. (2009). The role of dyadic communication in social cognitive development. Adv. Child Dev. Behav.37, 1-53. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03701-x
16. Leichsenring, F., Rabung, S., and Leibing, E. (2004). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 1208-1216. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1208
17. Lenoir, M., Serre, F., Cantin, L., and Ahmed, S. H. (2007). Intense sweetness surpasses cocaine reward. PLoS One2:e698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000698
18. Miczek, K. A., Nikulina, E. M., Shimamoto, A., and Covington, H. E. 3rd (2011). Escalated or suppressed cocaine reward, tegmental BDNF and accumbal dopamine caused by episodic versus continuous social stress in rats. J. Neurosci. 31, 9848-9857. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-11.2011
19. Pan, H. T., Menacherry, S., and Justice, J. B. Jr. (1991). Differences in the pharmacokinetics of cocaine in naive and cocaine-experienced rats. J. Neurochem. 56, 1299-1306. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb11425.x
20. Panksepp, J., Siviy, S., and Normansell, L. (1984). The psychobiology of play: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 8, 465-492. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(84)90005-8
21. Peartree, N. A., Hood, L. E., Thiel, K. J., Sanabria, F., Pentkowski, N. S., Chandler, K. N., et al. (2012). Limited physical contact through a mesh barrier is sufficient for social reward-conditioned place preference in adolescent male rats. Physiol. Behav. 105, 749-756. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.001
22. Pellis, S. M., Field, E. F., Smith, L. K., and Pellis, V. C. (1997). Multiple differences in the play fighting of male and female rats. Implications for the causes and functions of play. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21, 105-120. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00060-7
23. Ting, J. T., and Feng, G. (2013). Development of transgenic animals for optogenetic manipulation of mammalian nervous system function: progress and prospects for behavioral neuroscience. Behav. Brain Res. 255, 3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.02.037
24. Trezza, V., Baarendse, P. J., and Vanderschuren, L. J. (2010). The pleasures of play: pharmacological insights into social reward mechanisms. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 31, 463-469. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.06.008
25. Whishaw, I. Q., Metz, G. A., Kolb, B., and Pellis, S. M. (2001). Accelerated nervous system development contributes to behavioral efficiency in the laboratory mouse: a behavioral review and theoretical proposal. Dev. Psychobiol.39, 151-170. doi: 10.1002/dev.1041
26. Witten, I. B., Lin, S. C., Brodsky, M., Prakash, R., Diester, I., Anikeeva, P., et al. (2010). Cholinergic interneurons control local circuit activity and cocaine conditioning. Science 330, 1677-1681. doi: 10.1126/science.1193771
27. Yates, J. R., Beckmann, J. S., Meyer, A. C., and Bardo, M. T. (2013). Concurrent choice for social interaction and amphetamine using conditioned place preference in rats: effects of age and housing condition. Drug Alcohol. Depend. 129, 240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.024
28. Zernig, G., Ahmed, S. H., Cardinal, R. N., Morgan, D., Acquas, E., Foltin, R. W., et al. (2007). Explaining the escalation of drug use in substance dependence: models and appropriate animal laboratory tests. Pharmacology80, 65-119. doi: 10.1159/000103923
29. Zernig, G., Kummer, K. K., and Prast, J. M. (2013). Dyadic social interaction as an alternative reward to cocaine. Front. Psychiatry 4:100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00100
30. Zernig, G., Kurz, M., Saria, A., and O'malley, S. (2000). Handbook of Alcoholism. Boca Raton: CRC Press.