Concurrent choice for social interaction and amphetamine using conditioned place preference in rats: Effects of age and housing condition

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 240-246

  Yates, Justin R ^a   Beckmann, Joshua S ^a   Meyer, Andrew C ^b   Bardo, Michael T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Amphetamine; Concurrent choice; Conditioned place preference; Development; Differential housing; Social interaction

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT ANIMAL; AGE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL HOUSING; ARTICLE; AVERSION; CONDITIONING; DECISION MAKING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

AGING; AMPHETAMINE; ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HOUSING, ANIMAL; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

RATTUS;

EID: 84876094882     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adriani W., Laviola G. Elevated levels of impulsivity and reduced place conditioning with d-amphetamine: two behavioral features of adolescence in mice. Behav. Neurosci. 2003, 117:695-703.
2. Allen M., Donohue W.A., Griffin A., Ryan D., Mitchell Turner M.M. Comparing the influence of parents and peers on the choice to use drugs. Crim. Justice Behav. 2003, 30:163-186.
3. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-IV 1994, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC. 4th ed.
4. Badanich K.A., Adler K.J., Kirstein C.L. Adolescents differ from adults in cocaine conditioned place preference and cocaine-induced dopamine in the nucleus accumbens septi. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 550:95-106.
5. Badanich K.A., Maldonado A.M., Kirstein C.L. Early adolescents show enhanced acute cocaine-induced locomotor activity in comparison to late adolescent and adult rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 2008, 50:127-133.
6. Bahr S.J., Hoffmann J.P., Yang X. Parental and peer influence on the risk of adolescent drug use. J. Prim. Prev. 2005, 26:529-551.
7. Bardo M.T., Bevins R.A. Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward?. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2000, 153:31-43.
8. Bardo M.T., Rowlett J.K., Harris M.J. Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs: a meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1995, 19:39-51.
9. Bowling S.L., Bardo M.T. Locomotor and rewarding effects of amphetamine in enriched, social, and isolate reared rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1994, 48:459-464.
10. Calcagnetti D.J., Schechter M.D. Place conditioning reveals the rewarding aspect of social interaction in juvenile rats. Physiol. Behav. 1992, 51:667-672.
11. Campbell J.O., Wood R.D., Spear L.P. Cocaine and morphine-induced place conditioning in adolescent and adult rats. Physiol. Behav. 2000, 68:487-493.
12. Catlow B.J., Kirstein C.L. Heightened cocaine-induced locomotor activity in adolescent compared to adult female rats. J. Psychopharmacology 2005, 19:443-447.
13. 3 dopamine receptors are down-regulated in amphetamine sensitized rats and their putative antagonists modulate the locomotor sensitization to amphetamine. Brain Res. 2003, 972:159-167.
14. Collins S.L., Izenwasser S. Cocaine differentially alters behavior and neurochemistry in periadolescent versus adult rats. Dev. Brain Res. 2002, 138:27-34.
15. Dalton V.S., Zavitsanou K. Differential treatment regimen-related effects of cannabinoids on D1 and D2 receptors in adolescent and adult rat brain. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2010, 40:272-280.
16. 2-like dopamine receptor agonists and d-amphetamine by NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptor agonists and antagonists in the core of the rat nucleus accumbens. Neuropharmacol 2004, 46:179-191.
17. Douglas L.A., Varlinskaya E.I., Spear L.P. Rewarding properties of social interactions in adolescent and adult male and female rats: Impact of social versus isolate housing of subjects and partners. Dev. Psychobiol. 2004, 45:153-162.
18. Fritz M., El Rawas R., Salti A., Klement S., Bardo M.T., Kemmler G., Dechant G., Saria A., Zernig G. Reversal of cocaine-conditioned place preference and mesocorticolimbic Zif268 expression by social interaction in rats. Addict. Biol. 2011, 16:273-284.
19. Gill M.J., Arnold J.C., Cain M.E. Impact of mGluR5 during amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and conditioned hyperactivity in differentially reared rats. Psychopharmacol. (Berl.) 2012, 221:227-237.
20. 2-receptor density following chronic treatment with amphetamine as assessed with PET in nonhuman primates. Synapse 1999, 31:154-162.
21. Gipson C.D., Yates J.R., Beckmann J.S., Marusich J.A., Zentall T.R., Bardo M.T. Social facilitation of d-amphetamine self-administration in rats. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacology 2011, 19:409-419.
22. Hunt P.S., Holloway J.L., Scordalakes E.M. Social interaction with an intoxicated sibling can result in increased intake of ethanol by periadolescent rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 2001, 38:101-109.
23. Laviola G., Pascucci T., Pieretti S. Striatal dopamine sensitization to d-amphetamine in periadolescent but not adult rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2001, 68:115-124.
24. Laviola G., Wood R.D., Kuhn C., Francis R., Spear L.P. Cocaine sensitization in periadolescent and adult rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995, 275:345-357.
25. Leone P., Di Chiara G. Blockade of D-1 receptors by SCH 23390 antagonizes morphine and amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1987, 135:251-254.
26. Mathews I.Z., McCormick C.M. Female and male rats in late adolescence differ from adults in amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, but not in conditioned place preference for amphetamine. Behav. Pharmacol. 2007, 18:641-650.
27. National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 2011, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
28. Peartree N.A., Hood L.E., Thiel K.J., Sanabria F., Pentkowski N.S., Neisewander J.L. Limited physical contact through a mesh barrier is sufficient for social reward-conditioned place preference in adolescent male rats. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 105:749-756.
29. Perks S.M., Clifton P.G. Reinforcer revaluation and conditioned place preference. Physiol. Behav. 1997, 61:1-5.
30. Rademacher D.J., Kovacs B., Shen F., Napier T.C., Meredith G.E. The neural substrates of amphetamine conditioned place preference: implications for the formation of conditioned stimulus-reward associations. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24:2089-2097.
31. 2 dopamine binding site density. Neurosci. Lett. 1986, 72:325-329.
32. Schenk S., Hunt T., Colle L., Amit Z. Isolation versus grouped housing in rats: differential effects of low doses of heroin in the place preference paradigm. Life Sci. 1983, 32:1129-1134.
33. Schenk S., Hunt T., Malovechko R., Robertson A., Klukowski G., Amit Z. Differential effects of isolation housing on the conditioned place preference produced by cocaine and amphetamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1986, 24:1793-1796.
34. Smith M.A. Peer influences on drug self-administration: social facilitation and social inhibition of cocaine intake in male rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2012, 224:81-90.
35. Spear L.P. The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2000, 24:417-463.
36. Spyraki C., Fibiger H.C., Phillips A.G. Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning. Brain Res. 1982, 293:185-193.
37. Thiel K.J., Okun A.C., Neisewander J.L. Social reward-conditioned place preference: a model revealing an interaction between cocaine and social context rewards in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 96:202-212.
38. Thiel K.J., Sanabria F., Neisewander J.L. Synergistic interaction between nicotine and social rewards in adolescent male rats. Psychopharmacol. (Berl.) 2009, 204:391-402.
39. 3 receptors. Neuropharmacol 1997, 36:787-792.
40. Trezza V., Damsteegt R., Vanderschuren L.J.M.J. Conditioned place preference induced by social play behavior: parametrics, extinction, reinstatement and disruption by methylphenidate. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 19:659-669.
41. Tzschentke T.M. Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict. Biol. 2007, 12:227-462.
42. Van den Berg C.L., Pijlman F.T.A., Koning H.A.M., Diergaarde L., Van Ree J.M., Spruijt B.M. Isolation changes the incentive value of sucrose and social behaviour in juvenile and adult rats. Behav. Brain Res. 1999, 106:133-142.
43. Wang Y.-C., Wang C.-C., Lee C.-C., Huang A.C.W. Effects of single and group housing conditions and alterations in social and physical contexts on amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 486:34-37.
44. Zakharova E., Leoni G., Kichko I., Izenwasser S. Differential effects of methamphetamine and cocaine on conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in adult and adolescent male rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2009, 198:45-50.
45. Zakharova E., Miller J., Unterwald E., Wade D., Izenwasser S. Social and physical environment alter cocaine conditioned place preference and dopaminergic markers in adolescent male rats. Neurosci. 2009, 163:890-897.