Governing the balance between sustainability and competitiveness in urban planning: The case of the Orestad model

Environmental Policy and Governance

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 382-396

  Book, Karin ^a   Eskilsson, Lena ^b   Khan, Jamil ^c  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Hybrid organizations; Image building; Metro; Project oriented organizations; Sustainable development; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; FINANCE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

COPENHAGEN [(CTY) HOVEDSTADEN]; DENMARK; HOVEDSTADEN;

EID: 78649579051     PISSN: 1756932X     EISSN: 17569338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eet.557     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersen J. 2003. Gambling politics or successful entrepreneurialism? The Orestad in Copenhagen. In The Globalised City: Urban Redevelopment and Social Polarisation in the European City Moulart F, Swyngedouw E, Rodriquez A (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 91-106.
2. Bäckstrand K, Khan J, Kronsell A, Lävbrand E. 2010. Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy: Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance. Elgar: Cheltenham.
3. Battaglio RP, Khankarli GA. 2008. Toll roads, politics, and public-public partnerships: the case of Texas State Highway 121. Public Works Management Policy 13(2): 138-148.
4. Book K, Eskilsson L. 2001. Stadens Struktur - Varför Och Hur?, Meddelanden från Meddelande från Lunds universitets geografiska institutioner, serie avhandlingar. Lund.
5. Cascetta E, Pagliara F. 2008. Integrated railway-based policies: the Regional Metro System (RMS) project of Naples and Campiara. Transport Policy 15: 81-93.
6. Cervero R. 1994. Rail transit and joint development. Journal of the American Planning Association 60(1): 83-95.
7. Cervero R, Hall P, Landis J. 1992. Transit Joint Development in the United States. National Transit Access Center: Berkeley, CA.
8. Committee on Traffic Investments in the Greater Copenhagen Area. 1991. Ministry of State: Copenhagen.
9. CPH City and Port Development. Official webpage. [6 April 2009].
10. Ek R, Hultman J (eds). 2007. Plats som Produkt. Kommersialisering och Paketering. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
11. Enoch MP, Potter S, Ison SG. 2005. A strategic approach to financing public transport through property values. Public Money and Finance 25(3): 147-154.
12. Flyvbjerg, B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W. 2003. Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
13. Foster J. 1990. Docklands: Cultures in Conflict, Worlds in Collision. UCL Press: London.
14. Gardel JU, Abild L. 2002. I sporet af 11 milliarder (Den kobenhavnske metro). In Magtens Bog, Valuer E, Schjodt P J, Dahlin U, Gaardmand A (eds). Aschehoug: Copenhagen; 472-491.
15. Gudmundsson H. 2007. Sustainable Mobility and Incremental Change - Some Building Blocks for IMPACT, IMPACT working paper. [Accessed 22 October 2010]
16. Hall D, Lethbridge J, Lobina E. 2005. Public-Public Partnerships in Health and Essential Services, Equinet Discussion Paper 23. [9 April 2009].
17. Hall T. 2006. Urban Geography. Routledge: London.
18. Harvey D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler 71B: 3-17.
19. Jenkins O. 1999. Understanding and measuring tourist destination images. International Journal of Tourism Research 1(1): 1-15.
20. Jordan A. 2008. The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26: 17-33.
21. Karré PM, Cardoso-Ribeiro T. 2005. The 'social' profit of hybrid service delivery. Paper prepared for the EGPA Conference Bern.
22. Kavaratzis M, Ashworth G. 2005. City branding: an effective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(5): 506-514.
23. Kavaratzis M, Ashworth G. 2007. Partners in coffeeshops, canals and commerce: marketing the city of Amsterdam. Cities 24(1): 16-25.
24. Kickert WJM. 2001. Public management of hybrid organisations. International Public Management Journal 4: 135-150.
25. Koppel JGS. 2003. The Politics of Quasi-Government. Cambridge University Press: New York.
26. Kotler P, Haider D, Rein I. 1993. Marketing Places. Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States and Nations. Free Press: New York.
27. Kyvelou S, Karaiskou E. 2006. Urban development through PPPs in the Euro-Mediterranean region. Management of Environmental Quality: an International Journal 17(5): 599-610.
28. Lan Z, Rainey HG. 1992. Goals, rules and effectiveness in public, private and hybrid organisations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(1): 5-28.
29. Lowry S. 2008. Delivering on TOD. Planning 74(4): 18-19.
30. Lundin R, SÖderholm A. 1998. Conceptualizing a projectified society: discussion of an eco-institutional approach to a theory on temporary organizations. In Projects As Arenas For Renewal and Learning Processes, Lundin R, Midler C (eds). Kluwer: Boston, MA; 13-24.
31. Majoor S, Jorgensen J. 2007. Copenhagen Orestad: public partnership in search of the market. In Framing Strategic Urban Projects, Salet W, Gualini E (eds). Routledge: London; 172-198.
32. Maylor H, Brady T, Cooke-Davies T, Hodgson D. 2006. From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management 24: 663-674.
33. Metropolitan Commission. 1989. Hovedstaden: Hvad Vil Vi Med Den? Ministry of State: Copenhagen.
34. Municipality of Copenhagen. 2005. Planredegorelse for den kollektive trafik i Kobenhavn, Municipality of Copenhagen: Copenhagen.
35. Orestad Act. 1992. Ministry of State: Copenhagen.
36. Orestad Development Corporation (ODC). 1995. Orestad Master Plan. ODC: Copenhagen.
37. Orestad Development Corporation (ODC). 2002. Annual Report. ODC: Copenhagen.
38. Porter DR. 1998. Transit-focused development: a progress report. Journal of the American Planning Association 64(4): 476-489.
39. Priemus H, Flyvbjerg B, van Wee B (eds). 2008. Decision-Making on Mega-Projects: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Planning and Innovation. Elgar: Cheltenham.
40. Rehling D. 2002. Balladen om Vestamager. In Magtens Bog, Valuer E, Schjodt PJ, Dahlin U, Gaardmand A (eds). Aschehoug: Copenhagen; 462-471.
41. Renne JL. 2009. From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development. Local Environment 14(1): 1-15.
42. Sahlin-Andersson K, SÖderholm A. 2002. The Scandinavian School of Project Studies. In Beyond Project Management, Sahlin-Andersson K, Söderholm A (eds). Liber: Malmö; 11-24.
43. Tosics I, Dukes T. 2005. Urban development programmes in the context of public administration and urban policy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(4): 390-408.
44. Treib O, Bähr H, Falkner G. 2007. Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Environmental Policy 14(1): 1-20.
45. Ubbels B, Nijkamp P. 2002. Unconventional funding of urban public transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 7(5): 317-329.
46. United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD). 1997. Fifth Session. Overall Progress Achieved Since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, E/CN.17/1997/2; 5. [Accessed 22 October 2010]
47. Vuk G, Ildensborg-Hansen J. 2006. Trafikale Effekter af Metroen: en For- og Efteranalyse, Rapport 2 2006. Danmarks TransportForskning: Lyngby.
48. Ward S. 1998. Selling Places. The Marketing and Promotion of Towns and Cities 1850-2000. Spon: London.
49. Whitley R. 2006. Project-based firms: new organisational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change 15(1): 77-99.