Evaluation of ingroup disloyalty within a multigroup context

Social Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 382-390

  Rothgerber, Hank ^a  

^a BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disloyal group members; Ethical vegetarians; Health vegetarians; Ingroup disloyalty; Intergroup judgments; Vegans

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907955408     PISSN: 18649335     EISSN: 21512590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000196     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 906-912.
2. Booth-Butterfield, M., Anderson, R., & Williams, K. (2000). Perceived messages from schools regarding adolescent tobacco use. Communication Education, 49, 196-205.
3. Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
4. Elder, T. J., Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticisms of the ingroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 231-244.
5. Fox, N., & Ward, K. (2008). Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite, 50, 422-429.
6. Gallup. (2012). Gallup Poll. In U.S. 5% consider themselves vegetarians, July 26, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/poll/156215/consider-themselves-vegetarians.aspx
7. Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2003). Not being what you claim to be: Impostors as sources of group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 639-657.
8. Hornsey, M. J., Bruijn, P. D., Creed, J., Allen, J., Ariyanto, A., & Svensson, A. (2005). Keeping it in-house: how audience affects responses to group criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 291-312.
9. Hussar, K. M., & Harris, P. L. (2010). Children who choose not to eat meat: A study of early moral decision-making. Social Development, 19, 627-641.
10. Iyer, A., Jetten, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2012). Sugaring o'er the devil: Moral superiority and group identification help individuals downplay the implications of ingroup rule-breaking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 141-149.
11. Jabs, J., Devine, C. M., & Sobal, J. (1998). Maintaining vegetarian diets: Personal factors, social networks and environmental resources. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association, 59, 183-189. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11551357
12. Jabs, J., Sobal, J., & Devine, C. M. (2000). Managing vegetarianism: Identities, norms and interactions. Ecology of food and nutrition, 39, 375-394.
13. Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 2.1-2.25.
14. Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serodio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
15. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23.
16. Moscovici, S., Mucchi, A., & Maass, A. (1994). Minority influence. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
17. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
18. Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107-109.
19. Potts, A., & Parry, J. (2010). Vegan sexuality. Challenging heteronormative masculinity through meat-free sex. Feminism & Psychology, 20, 53-72.
20. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
21. Rothgerber, H. (2013). Vegetarianism, veganism, and the causes of meat abstention. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Rothgerber, H. (in press). You are why you eat: Horizontal hostility among non-meat-eaters. PLoS one.
23. Ruby, M. B. (2008). Of meat, morals, and masculinity: Factors underlying the consumption of non-human animals, and inferences about another's character. Master' s thesis, University of British Columbia.
24. Ruby, M. B., Cheng, T. K., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Cultural differences in food choices and attitudes towards animals. Unpublished raw data.
25. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
26. Warner, R., Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2007). Why minority group members resent impostors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1-17.
27. Whitcomb, S. J. (1998). Student perceptions of alcohol policy education and enforcement in the residence halls at a large state university: A study of environmental press. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 2396.
28. White, J. B., Schmitt, M. T., & Langer, E. J. (2006). Horizontal hostility: Multiple minority groups and differentiation from the mainstream. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 339-358.
29. Willetts, A. (1997). Bacon sandwiches got the better of me: Meat eating and vegetarianism in south-east London. In P. Caplan (Ed.), Food, Health, and Identity. New York, NY: Routledge.