Studying dynamic social processes with ARIMA modeling

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 693-708

  Vasileiadou, Eleftheria ^a   Vliegenthart, Rens ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ARIMA; communication science; dynamics; time series

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907815839     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2013.816257     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. (2000). Small groups as complex systems. Formation, coordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2. Boef, S. D., & Keele, L. (2008). Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 184–200.
3. Box, G., & Jenkins, G. (1970). Time series analysis, forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden Day.
4. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Smith, R. M. (1998). Investigating political dynamics using fractional integration method. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 661–689.
5. Buder, E. H. (1991). A nonlinear dynamic model of social interaction. Communication Research, 18, 174–198.
6. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057–1072.
7. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011). Applied longitudinal Analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
8. Freeman, J. R., Williams, J. T., & Lin, T. (1989). Vector autoregression and the study of politics. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 842–877.
9. Frisch, R. (1933). On the notion of equilibrium and disequilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, 3, 100–106.
10. Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analysis: A comprehensive introduction for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Hansen, K., & Joshi, H. (2007). Editorial: Special issue on child cohort studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10, 319–323.
12. Hollanders, D., & Vliegenthart, R. (2008). Telling what yesterday’s news might be tomorrow: Modeling media dynamics. Communications, 33, 47–68.
13. Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1988). On time and method (Vol. 13). Newbury Park: Sage.
14. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
15. Lambiotte, R., Ausloos, M., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Word statistics in blogs and RSS feeds: Towards empirical universal evidence. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 277–286.
16. McCleary, R., Hay, J. R. A., Meidinger, E. E., & McDowall, D. (1980). Applied time series analysis for the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
17. Medd, W. (2002). Complexity and the social world. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5, 71–81.
18. Morrison, K. (2012). Searching for causality in the wrong places. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 15–30.
19. Roggeband, C. M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch Parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics, 30, 524–548.
20. Romer, D. (2006). Time series models. In D. Romer, K. Kenski, K. Winneg, C. Adasiewicz, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Capturing campaign dynamics, 2000 and 2004; The National Annenberg Election Survey (pp. 165–243). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21. Ruspini, E. (2001). The study of women’s deprivation: How to reveal the gender dimension of poverty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 101–118.
22. Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2007). Behavioral complexity theory of media selection: A proposed theory for global virtual teams. Journal of Information Science, 33, 63–75.
23. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31, 361–395.
24. Vasileiadou, E. (2009). Stabilisation operationalised: Using time series analysis to understand the dynamics of research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 36–48.
25. Vasileiadou, E. (2012). Research teams as complex systems: Implications for knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10, 118–127.
26. Vasileiadou, E., & Safarzynska, K. (2010). Transitions: Taking complexity seriously. Futures, 42, 1176–1186. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.07.001.
27. Walther, J. B. (2002). Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present and future. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 235–257). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
28. Wilson, I., Huttly, S. R. A., & Fenn, B. (2006). A case study of sample design for longitudinal research: Young lives. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 351–365.
29. Yanovitzky, I., & VanLear, A. (2007). Time series analysis. Traditional and contemporary approaches. In A. F. Hayes, M. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The SAGE sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 89–124). Thousand Oaks: Sage.