Toxicological Assessment of Green Petroleum Coke

International Journal of Toxicology

Volumn 33, Issue , 2014, Pages 156S-167S

  McKee, Richard H ^a   Herron, Deborah ^b   Beatty, Patrick ^c   Podhasky, Paula ^c   Hoffman, Gary M ^d   Swigert, James ^e   Lee, Carol ^a   Wong, Diana ^f  

^a EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^b West Con Toxicology   (United States)

^c AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Huntingdon Life Sciences New Jersey   (United States)

^e EcoTox Assessments   (United States)

^f Westhollow Technology Center   (United States)

Author keywords

64741 79 3; petroleum coke; toxicity assessment

Indexed keywords

COKE; HYDROCARBON; PETROLEUM;

64741-79-3; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PETROLEUM COKE; RAT; REPRODUCTION; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TOXICITY ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY TESTING;

64741-79-3; PETROLEUM COKE; TOXICITY ASSESSMENT;

ANIMALS; COKE; FEMALE; HYDROCARBONS; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PETROLEUM; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REPRODUCTION; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 84907809922     PISSN: 10915818     EISSN: 1092874X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1091581813504187     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. US EPA. Data Collection and Development on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals. Federal Register. 2000; 65(248):81686.
2. Ellis P, Paul C. Tutorial: Delayed coking fundamentals. Paper presented at: AIChE 2000 Spring National Meeting; March 5-9, 2000; Atlanta, GA.
3. Al-Haj-Ibrahim H, Morsi B. Desulfurization of petroleum coke: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1992; 321(8):1835–1840.
4. Al-Haj-Ibrahim H, Ali M. Effect of the removal of sulphur and volatile matter on the true density of petroleum coke. Periodica Polytechnica Ser Chem Eng. 2005; 49(1):19–24.
5. Klonne D, Burns J, Halder C, Holdsworth C, Ulrich C. Two-year inhalation toxicity study of petroleum coke in rats and monkeys. Am J Ind Med. 1987; 11(3):375–389.
6. Hepler D, Beck L, Wingate D. Carcinogenic potential of petroleum cokes and process products. 2. Bioassay. In: MacFarland H, Holdwsorth C, MacGregor J, Call R, Kane M, eds. The Toxicology of Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Washington, DC: The American Petroleum Institute; 1982: 227–232.
7. Monarca S, Pasquini R, Sforzolini G, Viola V, Fagioli F. Application of Salmonella mutagenicity assay and determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in workplaces exposed to petroleum pitch and petroleum coke. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1982; 49(3-4):223–239.
8. Jongeneelen F, Anizion R, Theuws J, Bos R. Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene levels in workers handling petroleum coke. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1989; 26(1):133–136.
9. Dalbey W, Blackburn G, Roy T, Sasaki S, Krueger A, Mackerer C. Use of a surrogate aerosol in a preliminary screening for the potential carcinogenicity of coal coated with number 6 fuel oil. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998; 59(2):90–95.
10. Fedorak P, Coy D. Oil sands cokes affect microbial activities. Fuel. 2006; 85(12-13):1642–1651.
11. Narayanan P, Arnold D. Remediation of Sucarnoochee soil by agglomeration with petroleum coke. Adv Environ Res. 1997; 1(1):27–35.
12. Nakata C, Qualizza C, MacKinnon M, Renault S. Growth and physiological responses of Triticum aestivum and Deschampsia caespitosa exposed to petroleum coke. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011; 216(1-4):59–72.
13. Puttaswamy N, Turcotte D, Liber K. Variation in toxicity response of Ceriodaphnia dubia to Athabasca oil sands coke leachates. Chemosphere 2010; 80(5):489–497.
14. Salewski E. Farbemethode zum makroskopischen machweis von implantationsstellen am uterus der ratte. Arch Pathol Exp Pharmacol. 1964; 247: 367.
15. Dunlap W, Duffy J. Fortran IV functions for calculating exact probabilities associated with z, chi-square, t and f values. Behav Methods Inst. 1975; 7(1):59–60.
16. Armitage P. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1971.
17. Dunlap W, Marx M, Agamy G. Fortran IV functions for calculating probabilities associated with Dunnett’s test. Behav Res Methods Inst. 1981; 13(3):363–366.
18. Bartlett M. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc Royal Soc A 1937; 160(901):268–282.
19. Sokal R, Rohlf F. Biometry. 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman, 1995; 369–371.
20. Dunnett C. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955; 50(272):1096–1121.
21. Dunnett C. New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics. 1964; 20(3):482–491.
22. Cochran W, Cox G. Experimental Designs, New York, NY: John Wiley; 1959.
23. Siegel E. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1956: 98–99, 104–106.
24. Girling AE, Markarian RK, Bennett D. Aquatic toxicity testing of oil products—some recommendations. Chemosphere. 1992; 24(10):1469–1472.
25. Girling AE, Whale GF, Adema DMM. A guideline supplement for determining the aquatic toxicity of poorly water-soluble complex mixtures using water-accommodated fractions. Chemosphere. 1994; 29(12):2645–2649.
26. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). Standard Guide for Conducting Static 96-hour Toxicity Tests With Microalgae. ASTM Standard Guide 1218-90E. ASTM; Conshohocken, PA. 1990.
27. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS proprietary software, V8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 1999.
28. Murray F, Roth R, Nicolich M, Gray T, Simpson B. The relationship between developmental toxicity and aromatic-ring class profile of high-boiling petroleum substances. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, in press, 2013.
29. Roth R, Simpson B, Nicolich M, Murray F, Gray T. The relationship between repeat-dose toxicity and aromatic ring class profile of high-boiling petroleum substances. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, in press, 2013.
30. Domingo J. Vanadium: a review of the reproductive and developmental toxicity. Reprod Toxicol. 1996: 10(3);175–182.
31. DeSesso J. The relevance to humans in animal models for inhalation studies of cancer in the nose and upper airways. Good Pract Regul Law. 1993: 2(3);213–231.