Integrating accounts of speech production: The devil is in the representational details

Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 24-27

  Rapp, Brenda ^a   Buchwald, Adam ^b   Goldrick, Matthew ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive neuropsychology; Conduction aphasia; Phonological representations; Psycholinguistics

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH SOUND DISORDER;

EID: 84907798374     PISSN: 23273798     EISSN: 23273801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.848991     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C., & Dupoux, E. (2003). An influence of syntactic and semantic variables on word form retrieval. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 163–188. doi:10.1080/02643290242000907
2. Baldo, J. V., Klosterman, E. C., & Dronkers, N. F. (2008). It’s either a cook or a baker: Patients with conduction aphasia get the gist but lose the trace. Brain and Language, 105, 134–140. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.007
3. Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2011). Finding levels of abstraction in speech production: Evidence from sound production impairment. Psychological Science, 22, 1113–1119. doi:10.1177/0956797611417723
4. Buchwald, A. B., Rapp, B., & Stone, M. (2007). Insertion of discrete phonological units: An articulatory and acoustic investigation of aphasic speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 910–948. doi:10.1080/01690960701273532
5. Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 685–712. doi:10.1080/01690960802351260
6. Davidson, L. (2005). Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 619–633. doi:10.1080/02699200500114077
7. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, 219–260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
8. Goodglass, H. (1992). Diagnosis of conduction aphasia. In S. E. Kohn (Ed.), Conduction aphasia (pp. 39–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135–145. doi:10.1038/nrg3118
10. Hickok, G., Costanzo M., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2011). The role of Broca’s area in speech perception: Evidence from aphasia revisited. Brain and Language, 119, 214–220. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.08.001
11. Jacquemot, C., Dupoux, E., & Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2007). Breaking the mirror: Asymmetrical disconnection between the phonological input and output codes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 3–22. doi:10.1080/02643290600683342
12. Kay, J., & Ellis, A. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia Implications for psychological models of word retrieval. Brain, 110, 613–629. doi:10.1093/brain/110.3.613
13. Law, S.-P. (2004). Case Study Impairment to phonological processes in a Cantonese-speaking brain-damaged patient. Aphasiology, 18, 373–388. doi:10.1080/02687030344000544
14. McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1984). A two-route model of speech production: Evidence from aphasia. Brain, 107, 463–485. doi:10.1093/brain/107.2.463
15. McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2009). Apraxia of Speech: Definition and diffrerential diagnosis. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders (pp. 249–268). New York: Thieme.
16. Rogalsky, C., Love, T., Driscoll, D., Anderson, S. W., & Hickok, G. (2011). Are mirror neurons the basis of speech perception? Evidence from five cases with damage to the purported human mirror system. Neurocase, 17, 178–187. doi:10.1080/13554794.2010.509318
17. Romani, C., & Galluzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 817–850. doi:10.1080/02643290442000365
18. Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., & Olson, A. (2011). Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: Implications for a new model of speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 151–192. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.001
19. Romani, C., Olson, A., Semenza, C., & Granà, A. (2002). Patterns of phonological errors as a function of a phonological versus an articulatory locus of impairment. Cortex, 38, 541–567. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70022-4
20. Sevald, C. E., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 807–820. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1035
21. Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101–175. doi:10.1006/cogp.2000.0739
22. Wernicke, C. (1874/1969). The symptom complex of aphasia: A psychological study on an anatomical basis. In R. S. Cohen & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Boston studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 34–97). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.