Reconsolidation of a well-learned instrumental memory

Learning and Memory

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 468-477

  Exton McGuinness, Marc T J ^a,b   Patton, Rosemary C ^a   Sacco, Lawrence B ^a,c   Lee, Jonathan L C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIZOCILPINE MALEATE; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; DRUG EFFECTS; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MEMORY; RAT; RECALL; REINFORCEMENT; REWARD;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DIZOCILPINE MALEATE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; RATS; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD;

EID: 84907798165     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: 15495485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.035543.114     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams CD. 1982. Variations in the sensitivity of instrumental responding to reinforcer devaluation. Q J Exp Psychol 34B: 77-98.
2. Balleine BW, Dickinson A. 1991. Instrumental performance following reinforcer devaluation depends upon incentive learning. Q J Exp Psychol B 43: 279-296.
3. Balleine BW, Dickinson A. 1998. Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology 37: 407-419.
4. Balleine BW, O'Doherty JP. 2010. Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 48-69.
5. Balleine BW, Ostlund SB. 2007. Still at the choice-point: action selection and initiation in instrumental conditioning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1104: 147-171.
6. Ceretta APC, Camera K, Mello CF, Rubin MA. 2008. Arcaine and MK-801 make recall state-dependent in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 201: 405-411.
7. Corbit LH, Janak PH, Balleine BW. 2007. General and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer: the effect of shifts in motivational state and inactivation of the ventral tegmental area. Eur J Neurosci 26: 3141-3149.
8. de Wit S, Dickinson A. 2009. Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: a case for animal-human translational models. Psychol Res 73: 463-476.
9. Díaz-Mataix L, Ruiz Martinez RC, Schafe GE, LeDoux JE, Doyère V. 2013. Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories. Curr Biol 23: 467-472.
10. Dickinson A. 1985. Actions and habits: the development of behavioural autonomy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 308: 67-78.
11. Dickinson A, Balleine BW. 1994. Motivational control of goal-directed action. Anim Learn Behav 22: 1-18.
12. Dickinson A, Nicholas DJ, Adams CD. 1983. The effect of the instrumental training contingency on susceptibility to reinforcer devaluation. Q J Exp Psychol 35B: 35-51.
13. Dickinson A, Balleine B, Watt A, Gonzalez F, Boakes RA. 1995. Motivational control after extended instrumental training. Anim Learn Behav 23: 197-206.
14. Dickinson A, Watt A, Varga ZI. 1996. Context conditioning and free operant acquisition under delayed reinforcement. Q J Exp Psychol B 49: 97-110.
15. Dickinson A, Squire S, Varga ZI, Smith JW. 1998. Omission learning after instrumental pretraining. Q J Exp Psychol B 51: 271-286.
16. Dudai Y. 2004. The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annu Rev Psychol 55: 51-86.
17. Flavell CR, Lee JLC. 2013. Reconsolidation and extinction of an appetitive Pavlovian memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 104: 25-31.
18. Flint RW, Noble LJ, Ulmen AR. 2013. NMDA receptor antagonism with MK-801 impairs consolidation and reconsolidation of passive avoidance conditioning in adolescent rats: evidence for a state dependent reconsolidation effect. Neurobiol Learn Mem 101: 114-119.
19. Glimcher PW. 2011. Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108 (Suppl): 15647-15654.
20. Hargreaves EL, Cain DP. 1995. MK801-induced hyperactivity: duration of effects in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 51: 13-19.
21. Hernandez PJ, Kelley AE. 2004. Long-term memory for instrumental responses does not undergo protein synthesis-dependent reconsolidation upon retrieval. Learn Mem 11: 748-754.
22. Hogarth L. 2012. Goal-directed and transfer-cue-elicited drug-seeking are dissociated by pharmacotherapy: evidence for independent additive controllers. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 38: 266-278.
23. Hogarth L, Chase HW. 2011. Parallel goal-directed and habitual control of human drug-seeking: implications for dependence vulnerability. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 37: 261-276.
24. Holland PC. 2004. Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 30: 104-117.
25. Jonkman S, Everitt BJ. 2009. Post-learning infusion of anisomycin into the anterior cingulate cortex impairs instrumental acquisition through an effect on reinforcer valuation. Learn Mem 16: 706-713.
26. Jonkman S, Everitt BJ. 2011. Dorsal and ventral striatal protein synthesis inhibition affect reinforcer valuation but not the consolidation of instrumental learning. Learn Mem 18: 617-624.
27. Jonkman S, Kosaki Y, Everitt BJ, Dickinson A. 2010. The role of contextual conditioning in the effect of reinforcer devaluation on instrumental performance by rats. Behav Processes 83: 276-281.
28. Killcross S, Coutureau E. 2003. Coordination of actions and habits in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats. Cereb Cortex 13: 400-408.
29. Lee JLC. 2009. Reconsolidation: maintaining memory relevance. Trends Neurosci 32: 413-420.
30. Lee JLC. 2010. Memory reconsolidation mediates the updating of hippocampal memory content. Front Behav Neurosci 4: 168.
31. Lee JLC, Everitt BJ. 2008. Reactivation-dependent amnesia in Pavlovian approach and instrumental transfer. Learn Mem 15: 597-602.
32. Lee JLC, Milton AL, Everitt BJ. 2006. Reconsolidation and extinction of conditioned fear: inhibition and potentiation. J Neurosci 26: 10051-10056.
33. Lelos MJ, Harrison DJ, Dunnett SB. 2011. Impaired sensitivity to Pavlovian stimulus-outcome learning after excitotoxic lesion of the ventrolateral neostriatum. Behav Brain Res 225: 522-528.
34. McGaugh JL. 2000. Memory-a century of consolidation. Science 287: 248-251.
35. Merlo E, Milton AL, Goozee ZY, Theobald DE, Everitt BJ. 2014. Reconsolidation and extinction are dissociable and mutually exclusive processes: behavioral and molecular evidence. J Neurosci 34: 2422-2431.
36. Mierzejewski P, Korkosz A, Rogowski A, Korkosz I, Kostowski W, Scinska A. 2009. Post-session injections of a protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide do not alter saccharin self-administration. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33: 286-289.
37. Millin PM, Moody EW, Riccio DC. 2001. Interpretations of retrograde amnesia: old problems redux. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 68-70.
38. Milton AL, Everitt BJ. 2012. The persistence of maladaptive memory: addiction, drug memories and anti-relapse treatments. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36: 1119-1139.
39. Milton AL, Lee JLC, Butler VJ, Gardner R, Everitt BJ. 2008a. Intraamygdala and systemic antagonism of NMDA receptors prevents the reconsolidation of drug-associated memory and impairs subsequently both novel and previously acquired drug-seeking behaviors. J Neurosci 28: 8230-8237.
40. Milton AL, Lee JLC, Everitt BJ. 2008b. Reconsolidation of appetitive memories for both natural and drug reinforcement is dependent on β-adrenergic receptors. Learn Mem 15: 88-92.
41. Milton AL, Schramm MJW, Wawrzynski JR, Gore F, Oikonomou-Mpegeti F, Wang NQ, Samuel D, Economidou D, Everitt BJ. 2012. Antagonism at NMDA receptors, but not β-adrenergic receptors, disrupts the reconsolidation of Pavlovian conditioned approach and instrumental transfer for ethanol-associated conditioned stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 219: 751-761.
42. Misanin JR, Miller RR, Lewis DJ. 1968. Retrograde amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock after reactivation of a consolidated memory trace. Science 160: 554-555.
43. Nader K. 2003. Memory traces unbound. Trends Neurosci 26: 65-72.
44. Parkes SL, Balleine BW. 2013. Incentive memory: evidence the basolateral amygdala encodes and the insular cortex retrieves outcome values to guide choice between goal-directed actions. J Neurosci 33: 8753-8763.
45. Piñeyro ME, Ferrer Monti RI, Alfei JM, Bueno AM, Urcelay GP. 2014. Memory destabilization is critical for the success of the reactivation-extinction procedure. Learn Mem 21: 46-54.
46. Przybyslawski J, Sara SJ. 1997. Reconsolidation of memory after its reactivation. Behav Brain Res 84: 241-246.
47. Reichelt AC, Lee JLC. 2012. Appetitive Pavlovian goal-tracking memories reconsolidate only under specific conditions. Learn Mem 20: 51-60.
48. Reichelt AC, Lee JLC. 2013a. Memory reconsolidation in aversive and appetitive settings. Front Behav Neurosci 7: 118.
49. Reichelt AC, Lee JLC. 2013b. Over-expectation generated in a complex appetitive goal-tracking task is capable of inducing memory reconsolidation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 226: 649-658.
50. Reichelt AC, Exton-McGuinness MT, Lee JLC. 2013. Ventral tegmental dopamine dysregulation prevents appetitive memory destabilization. J Neurosci 33: 14205-14210.
51. Rescorla RA. 1994. Transfer of instrumental control mediated by a devalued outcome. Anim Learn Behav 22: 27-33.
52. Sevenster D, Beckers T, Kindt M. 2013. Prediction error governs pharmacologically induced amnesia for learned fear. Science 339: 830-833.
53. Sutton R, Barto A. 1998. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
54. Suzuki A, Josselyn SA, Frankland PW, Masushige S, Silva AJ, Kida S. 2004. Memory reconsolidation and extinction have distinct temporal and biochemical signatures. J Neurosci 24: 4787-4795.
55. Wang S-H, Ostlund SB, Nader K, Balleine BW. 2005. Consolidation and reconsolidation of incentive learning in the amygdala. J Neurosci 25: 830-835.
56. Wiltgen BJ, Sinclair C, Lane C, Barrows F, Molina M, Chabanon-Hicks C. 2012. The effect of ratio and interval training on Pavlovianinstrumental transfer in mice. PLoS One 7: e48227.
57. Yin HH, Ostlund SB, Balleine BW. 2008. Reward-guided learning beyond dopamine in the nucleus accumbens: the integrative functions of cortico-basal ganglia networks. Eur J Neurosci 28: 1437-1448.