Context Conditioning and Free-operant Acquisition under Delayed Reinforcement

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 97-110

  Dickinson, A ^a,b   Watt, A ^a   Varga, Z I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030546161     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baum, W.M. (1973). The correlational-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137-143.
2. Beatty, W.W. & Maki, W.S. (1979). Acquisition of instrumental responding following noncontingent reinforcement: Failure to observe "learned laziness" in rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 268-271.
3. Cheng, P.W., & Novick, L.R. (1991). Causes versus enabling conditions. Cognition, 40, 83-120.
4. Cheng, P.W., & Novick, L.R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365-382.
5. Critchfield, T.S., & Lattal, K.A. (1993). Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 373-387.
6. Dickinson, A., & Charnock, D.J. (1985). Contingency effects with maintained instrumental reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 397-416.
7. Dickinson, A., & Mulatero, C.W. (1989). Reinforcer specificity of the suppression of instrumental performance on a non-contingent schedule. Behavioural Processes, 19, 167-180.
8. Dickinson, A., Watt, A., & Griffiths, W.J.H. (1992). Free-operant acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 241-258.
9. Gansen, R., & Pearce, J.M. (1988). Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 280-291.
10. Hammond, L.J. (1980). The effects of contingencies upon appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 297-304.
11. Hammond, L.J., & Paynter, W.E., Jr. (1983). Probabilistic contingency theories of animal conditioning: A critical analysis. Learning and Motivation, 14, 527-550.
12. Hammond, L.J., & Weinberg, M. (1984). Signaling unearned reinforcers removes suppression produced by a zero correlation in an operant paradigm. Animal Learning and Behavior, 12, 371-374.
13. Lattal, K.A., & Gleeson, S. (1990). Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 27-39.
14. Mackintosh, N.J., & Dickinson, A. (1979). Instrumental (Type II) conditioning. In A. Dickinson & R.A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanism of learning and motivation (pp. 143-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Miller, R.R., & Schachtman, T.R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R.R. Miller & N.E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Pearce, J.M., & Hall, G. (1979). The influence of context-reinforcer associations on instrumental performance. Animal Learning and Behavior, 7, 504-508.
17. Reed, P., & Reilly, S. (1990) Context extinction following conditioning with delayed reward enhances subsequent instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 48-55.
18. Rescorla, R.A., & Solomon, R.L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151-182.
19. Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
20. Revusky, S.H. (1971). The role of interference in association over a delay. In W.K. Honig & P.H.R. James (Eds.), Animal memory (pp. 155-213). New York: Academic Press.
21. Schlinger, H.D. Jr., & Blakely, E. (1994). The effects of delayed reinforcement and a response-produced auditory stimulus on the acquisition of operant behavior in rats. Psychological Record, 44, 391-409.
22. Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
23. Wheatley, K.L., Welker, R.L., & Miles, R.C. (1977). Acquisition of bar pressing in rats following experience with response-independent food. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 236-242.
24. Wilkenfield, J., Nickel, M., Blakely, E., & Poling, A. (1992). Acquisition of lever-press responding in rats with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of three procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 431-443.
25. Williams, B.A. (1989a). Signal duration and suppression of operant responding by free reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 20, 335-357.
26. Williams, B.A. (1989b). The effect of response contingency and reinforcement identity on response suppression by alternative reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 20, 204-224.
27. Williams, B.A. (1994). Blocking despite changes in reinforcer identity. Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 442-457.