Impaired sensitivity to Pavlovian stimulus-outcome learning after excitotoxic lesion of the ventrolateral neostriatum

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 225, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 522-528

  Lelos, Mariah J ^a   Harrison, David J ^a   Dunnett, Stephen B ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Goal directed learning; Habit formation; Pavlovian outcome learning; Satiety specific devaluation; Ventrolateral neostriatum

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AVERSIVE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCITOTOXICITY; FEMALE; HABITUATION; LEARNING; NEOSTRIATUM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; FEMALE; HABITS; NEOSTRIATUM; QUINOLINIC ACID; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS;

EID: 80052960708     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Yin H.H., Knowlton B.J. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7(6):464-476.
2. Yin H.H., Knowlton B.J., Balleine B.W. Lesions of dorsolateral striatum preserve outcome expectancy but disrupt habit formation in instrumental learning. Eur J Neurosci 2004, 19(1):181-189.
3. Yin H.H., Knowlton B.J., Balleine B.W. Blockade of NMDA receptors in the dorsomedial striatum prevents action-outcome learning in instrumental conditioning. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22(2):505-512.
4. Yin H.H., Ostlund S.B., Knowlton B.J., Balleine B.W. The role of the dorsomedial striatum in instrumental conditioning. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22:513-523.
5. Corbit L.H., Muir J.L., Balleine B.W. The role of the nucleus accumbens in instrumental conditioning: evidence of a functional dissociation between accumbens core and shell. J Neurosci 2001, 21(9):3251-3260.
6. Ramanathan S., Hanley J.J., Deniau J.M., Bolam J.P. Synaptic convergence of motor and somatosensory cortical afferents onto GABAergic interneurons in the rat striatum. J Neurosci 2002, 22(18):8158-8169.
7. Lasiter P.S., Deems D.A., Glanzman D.L. Thalamocortical relations in taste aversion learning: I. Involvement of gustatory thalamocortical projections in taste aversion learning. Behav Neurosci 1985, 99(3):454-476.
8. Dunnett S.B., Iversen S.D. Neurotoxic lesions of ventrolateral but not anteromedial neostriatum in rats impair differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL) performance. Behav Brain Res 1982, 6(3):213-226.
9. Dickinson A., Nicholas D.J., Adams C.D. The effect of the instrumental training contingency on susceptibility to reinforcer devaluation. Quart J Exp Psychol Sect B: Comp Physiol Psychol 1983, 35(1):35-51.
10. Holland P.C. Amount of training effects in representation-mediated food aversion learning: no evidence of a role for associability changes. Learn Behav 2005, 33(4):464-478.
11. Corbit L.H., Balleine B.W. Instrumental and Pavlovian incentive processes have dissociable effects on components of a heterogeneous instrumental chain. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2003, 29(2):99-106.
12. Balleine B.W., Garner C., Gonzalez F., Dickinson A. Motivational control of heterogeneous instrumental chains. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 1995, 21(3):203-217.
13. Corbit L.H., Janak P.H. Posterior dorsomedial striatum is critical for both selective instrumental and Pavlovian reward learning. Eur J Neurosci 2010, 31(7):1312-1321.
14. Fricker R.A., Annett L.E., Torres E.M., Dunnett S.B. The placement of a striatal ibotenic acid lesion affects skilled forelimb use and the direction of drug-induced rotation. Brain Res Bull 1996, 41(6):409-416.
15. McGeorge A.J., Faull R.L. The organization of the projection from the cerebral cortex to the striatum in the rat. Neuroscience 1989, 29(3):503-537.
16. Holland P.C., Gallagher M. Amygdala-frontal interactions and reward expectancy. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004, 14(2):148-155.
17. Kerfoot E.C., Agarwal I., Lee H.J., Holland P.C. Control of appetitive and aversive taste-reactivity responses by an auditory conditioned stimulus in a devaluation task: a FOS and behavioral analysis. Learn Mem 2007, 14(9):581-589.
18. Blundell P., Hall G., Killcross S. Preserved sensitivity to outcome value after lesions of the basolateral amygdala. J Neurosci 2003, 23(20):7702-7709.
19. Gallagher M., McMahan R.W., Schoenbaum G. Orbitofrontal cortex and representation of incentive value in associative learning. J Neurosci 1999, 19(15):6610-6614.
20. McDonald A.J. Organization of amygdaloid projections to the prefrontal cortex and associated striatum in the rat. Neuroscience 1991, 44(1):1-14.
21. Kelley A.E., Domesick V.B., Nauta,F W.J. The amygdalostriatal projection in the rat-an anatomical study by anterograde and retrograde tracing methods. Neuroscience 1982, 7(3):615-630.
22. Voorn P., Vanderschuren L.J., Groenewegen H.J., Robbins T.W., Pennartz C.M. Putting a spin on the dorsal-ventral divide of the striatum. Trends Neurosci 2004, 27(8):468-474.
23. Kimura A., Imbe H., Donishi T. Efferent connections of an auditory area in the caudal insular cortex of the rat: anatomical nodes for cortical streams of auditory processing and cross-modal sensory interactions. Neuroscience 2010, 166(4):1140-1157.
24. Remedios R., Logothetis N.K., Kayser C. An auditory region in the primate insular cortex responding preferentially to vocal communication sounds. J Neurosci 2009, 29(4):1034-1045.
25. Renier L.A., Anurova I., De Volder A.G., Carlson S., VanMeter J., Rauschecker J.P. Multisensory integration of sounds and vibrotactile stimuli in processing streams for " what" and " where" J Neurosci 2009, 29(35):10950-10960.