Detection of mild traumatic brain injury in rodent models using shear wave elastography: Preliminary studies

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1763-1771

  Xu, Zinnia S ^a   Yao, Anning ^a   Chu, Stephanie S ^a   Paun, Marla K ^b   McClintic, Abbi M ^c   Murphy, Sean P ^c   Mourad, Pierre D ^a,b,c  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Edema; Elastography; Traumatic brain injury; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ELASTICITY; MEDICAL IMAGING; RATS; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR WAVES; STIFFNESS; TISSUE; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONIC WAVES; ULTRASONICS;

CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; EDEMA; ELASTOGRAPHY; MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES; SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; TISSUE ELASTICITY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES; ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVES;

BRAIN;

ANIMAL; ARTIFACT; BRAIN INJURY; DISEASE MODEL; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MOUSE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STAINING; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN INJURIES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 84907774644     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: 15509613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.10.1763     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Meyer K, Helmick K, Doncevic S, Park R. Severe and penetrating traumatic brain injury in the context of war. J Trauma Nurs 2008; 15:185-189.
2. Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.
3. Lee B, Newberg A. Neuroimaging in traumatic brain imaging. NeuroRx 2005; 2:372-383.
4. Fryback DG, Thronbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 2:88-94.
5. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, et al. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34:1373-1386.
6. Deffieux T, Gennisson JL, Larrat B, Fink M, Tanter M. The variance of quantitative estimates in shear wave imaging: theory and experiments. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2012; 59:2390-2410.
7. Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013; 94:487-495.
8. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 2010; 256:297-303.
9. Garra BS. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q 2011; 27:177-186.
10. Derieppe M, Delmas Y, Gennisson JL, et al. Detection of intrarenal microstructural changes with supersonic shear wave elastography in rats. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:243-250.
11. Xu ZS, Lee RJ, Chu SS, et al. Evidence of changes in brain tissue stiffness after ischemic stroke derived from ultrasound-based elastography. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32:485-494.
12. Macé E, Cohen I, Montaldo G, Miles R, Fink M, Tanter M. In vivo mapping of brain elasticity in small animals using shear wave imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30:550-558.
13. Misgeld T, Kerschensteiner M, Bareyre FM, Burgess RW, Lichtman JW. Imaging axonal transport of mitochondria in vivo. Nat Methods 2007; 4:559-561.
14. Lighthall JW. Controlled cortical impact: a new experimental brain injury model. J Neurotrauma 1988; 5:1-15.
15. Dixon CE, Clifton GL, Lighthall JW, Yaghmai AA, Hayes RL. A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 1991; 39:253-262.
16. Green MA, Bilston LE, Sinkus R. In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed 2008; 21:755-764.
17. Kruse SA, Rose GH, Glaser KJ, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Neuroimage 2008; 39:231-237.
18. McCracken PJ, Manduca A, Felmlee J, Ehman RL. Mechanical transient-based magnetic resonance elastography. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53:628-639.
19. Cherian L, Robertson CS, Contant CF Jr, Bryan RM Jr. Lateral cortical impact injury in rats: cerebrovascular effects of varying depth of cortical deformation and impact velocity. J Neurotrauma 1994; 11:573-585.
20. Colgan NC, Cronin MM, Gobbo OL, et al. Quantiative MRI analysis of brain volume changes due to controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:1265-1274.
21. Bryan RM Jr, Cherian L, Robertson C. Regional cerebral blood flow after controlled cortical impact injury in rats. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:687-695.
22. Baskaya MK, Dogan A, Temiz C, Dempsey RJ. Application of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining to evaluate injury volume after controlled cortical impact brain injury: role of brain edema in evolution of injury volume. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17:93-99.
23. Elliott MB, Jallo JJ, Tuma RF. An investigation of cerebral edema and injury volume assessments for controlled cortical impact injury. J Neurosci Methods 2008; 168:320-324.
24. Boulet T, Kelso ML, Othamn SF. Microscopic magnetic resonance elas-trography of traumatic brain injury model. J Neurosci Methods 2011; 201:296-306.
25. Boulet T, Kelso ML, Othman SF. Long-term in vivo imaging of vis-coelastic properties of the mouse brain following controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30:1512-1520.
26. Lundblad C, Grande PO, Bentzer P. A mouse model for evaluation of capillary perfusion, microvascular permeability, cortical blood flow, and cortical edema in the traumatized brain. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21:741-753.
27. O'Reilly M, Hynynen K. Ultrasound enhanced drug delivery to the brain and central nervous system. Int J Hyperthermia 2012; 28: 386-396.