GeLC-MS/MS analysis of complex protein mixtures

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1156, Issue , 2014, Pages 53-66

  Dzieciatkowska, Monika ^a   Hill, Ryan ^a   Hansen, Kirk C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

GeLC MS MS; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Protein digestion; Protein fractionation; Protein identifi cation; SDS PAGE

Indexed keywords

ISOPROTEIN; PROTEIN; DRUG MIXTURE;

ARTICLE; CELL MIGRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; CHEMISTRY; DRUG MIXTURE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; COMPLEX MIXTURES; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84907752981     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0685-7_4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Zubarev RA (2013) The challenge of the proteome dynamic range and its implications for in-depth proteomics. Proteomics 13:723–726
2. Michelsen U, von Hagen J (2009) Isolation of subcellular organelles and structures. Methods Enzymol 463:305–328
3. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR 3rd (2001) Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identifi cation technology. Nat Biotechnol 19:242–247
4. Rosenfeld J, Capdevielle J, Guillemot JC et al (1992) In-gel digestion of proteins for internal sequence analysis after one- or two- dimensional gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem 203:173–179
5. Hellman U, Wernstedt C, Góñez J et al (1995) Improvement of an “In-Gel” digestion procedure for the micropreparation of internal protein fragments for amino acid sequencing. Anal Biochem 224:451–455
6. Baldwin MA (2004) Protein identifi cation by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:1–9
7. Chalkley RJ, Hansen KC, Baldwin MA (2005) Bioinformatic methods to exploit mass spectrometric data for proteomic applications. Methods Enzymol 402:289–312
8. Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R et al (2008) ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24:2534–2536
9. Zhang Y, Fonslow BR, Shan B et al (2013) Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics. Chem Rev 113:2343–2394
10. Ericsson C, Nistér M (2011) Protein extraction from solid tissue. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 675:307–312
11. Jiang L, He L, Fountoulakis M (2004) Comparison of protein precipitation methods for sample preparation prior to proteomic analysis. J Chromatogr A 1023:317–320
12. Havlis J, Thomas H, Sebela M et al (2003) Fast-response proteomics by accelerated in-gel digestion of proteins. Anal Chem 75: 1300–1306
13. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM et al (1999) Probability-based protein identifi cation by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20: 3551–3567
14. Craig R, Beavis RC (2004) TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20: 1466–1467
15. Clauser KR, Baker P, Burlingame AL (1999) Role of accurate mass measurement (+/− 10 ppm) in protein identifi cation strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching. Anal Chem 71:2871–2882
16. Chalkley RJ, Baker PR, Hansen KC et al (2005) Comprehensive analysis of a multidimensional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry dataset acquired on a quadrupole selecting, quadrupole collision cell, time-of- fl ight mass spectrometer: I. How much of the data is theoretically interpretable by search engines? Mol Cell Proteomics MCP 4:1189–1193
17. Chalkley RJ, Baker PR, Huang L et al (2005) Comprehensive analysis of a multidimensional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry dataset acquired on a quadrupole selecting, quadrupole collision cell, time-of-fl ight mass spectrometer: II. New developments in protein prospector allow for reliable and comprehensive automatic analysis of large datasets. Mol Cell Proteomics MCP 4:1194–1204
18. Kubo K (1995) Effect of incubation of solutions of proteins containing dodecyl sulfate on the cleavage of peptide bonds by boiling. Anal Biochem 225:351–353
19. Chiari M, Righetti PG, Negri A et al (1992) Preincubation with cysteine prevents modifi cation of sulfhydryl groups in proteins by unreacted acrylamide in a gel. Electrophoresis 13: 882–884
20. Pepinsky RB (1991) Selective precipitation of proteins from guanidine hydrochloridecontaining solutions with ethanol. Anal biochem 195:177–181
21. Lill JR, Nesatyy VJ (2012) Microwave-assisted protein staining, destaining, and in-gel/insolution digestion of proteins. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 869:521–532
22. Shi Y, Mowery RA, Ashley J et al (2012) Abnormal SDS-PAGE migration of cytosolic proteins can identify domains and mechanisms that control surfactant binding. Protein Sci 21:1197–1209
23. Woods AG, Sokolowska I, Darie CC (2012) Identifi cation of consistent alkylation of cysteine- less peptides in a proteomics experiment. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 419: 305–308
24. Choudhary G, Wu S-L, Shieh P et al (2003) Multiple enzymatic digestion for enhanced sequence coverage of proteins in complex proteomic mixtures using capillary LC with Ion trap MS/MS. J Proteome Res 2:59–67
25. Swaney DL, Wenger CD, Coon JJ (2010) Value of using multiple proteases for largescale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J Proteome Res 9:1323–1329
26. Speicher K, Kolbas O, Harper S et al (2000) Systematic analysis of peptide recoveries from in-gel digestions for protein identifi cations in proteome studies. J Biomol Tech JBT 11: 74–86
27. Hsieh EJ, Bereman MS, Durand S et al (2013) Effects of column and gradient lengths on peak capacity and peptide identifi cation in nanofl ow LC-MS/MS of complex proteomic samples. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 24:148–153
28. Swaney DL, McAlister GC, Coon JJ (2008) Decision tree-driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. Nat Methods 5:959–964