All for one and one for all: Representing teams as a collection of individuals and an individual collective using a network perceptual cycle approach

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 777-792

  Plant, Katherine L ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision making; Distributed cognition; Networks; Perceptual cycle model; Teams

Indexed keywords

NETWORKS (CIRCUITS);

CYCLE MODEL; DISTRIBUTED COGNITION; TEAMS;

DECISION MAKING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; DISTRIBUTED COGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING BIAS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL CYCLE MODEL; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 84907674550     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: 18728219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Artman H., Garbis C. Team communication and coordination as distributed cognition. Proceedings of 9th Conference of Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and Cooperation 1998, 151-156.
2. Baber C., Stanton N.A., Atkinson J., McMaster R., Houghton R.J. Using social network analysis and agent-based modelling to explore information flow using common operational pictures for maritime search and rescue operations. Ergonomics 2013, 56(6):889-905.
3. Boyatzis R.E. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Carvalho P.V.R., dos Santos I.L., Vidal M.C.R. Nuclear power plant shift supervisor's decision making during microincidents. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2005, 35:619-644.
5. Crandall B., Gretchell-Reiter K. Critical decision method: a technique for eliciting concrete assessment indicators from the intuition of NICU nurses. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 1993, 16:42-51.
6. Crandall B., Klein G.A., Hoffman R.R. Working Minds: a Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Dekker S. The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error 2006, Ashgate, Aldershot.
8. Drivalou S., Marmaras N. Supporting skill-, rule-, and knowledge-based behaviour through an ecological interface: an industry -scale application. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009, 39:947-965.
9. Hollnagel E. Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control 1993, Academic Press, London.
10. Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Jenkins D., Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Rafferty L. What could they have been thinking? How sociotechnical system design influences cognition: a case study of the Stockwell shooting. Ergonomics 2011, 54(2):103-119.
12. Kirlik A., Strauss R. Situation awareness as judgement I: statistical modelling and quantitative measurement. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2006, 36:463-474.
13. Klein G.A. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Klein G.A., Armstrong A. Critical decision method. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods 2005, 50.1-50.5. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. N.A. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas, H. Hendrick (Eds.).
15. Klein G.A., Calderwood R., Macgregor D. Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern. 1989, 19(3):462-472.
16. Levi D., Slem C. Team work in research and development organisations: the characteristics of successful teams. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 1995, 16:29-42.
17. Lipshitz R., Shaul S.B. Schemata and mental models in recognition-primed decision making. Naturalistic Decision Making 1997, 60-72. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. C.E. Zsambok, G. Klein (Eds.).
18. Lipshitz R., Klein G.A., Orasanu J., Salas E. Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J.Behav. Decis. Mak. 2001, 14:331-352.
19. Neisser U. Cognition and Reality 1976, W.H.Freemand and Co, San Francisco.
20. O'Hare D., Wiggins M., Williams A., Wong W. Cognitive task analyses for decision centred design and training. Ergonomics 1998, 41(11):1698-1718.
21. Plant K.L., Stanton N.A. Why did the pilots shut down the wrong engine? Explaining errors in context using schema theory and the perceptual cycle model. Safety Sci. 2012, 50:300-315.
22. Plant K.L., Stanton N.A. The explanatory power of schema theory: theoretical foundations and future applications in Ergonomics. Ergonomics 2013, 56(1):1-15.
23. Plant K.L., Stanton N.A. What is on your mind? Using the perceptual cycle model and criticla decision method to understand the decision-making process in the cockpit. Ergonomics 2013, 56(8):1232-1250.
24. Rasmussen J. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern. 1983, 13(3):257-266.
25. Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Baber C., Jenkins D.P., McMaster R., Young M.S. What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2008, 9(4):297-323.
26. Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Jenkins D.P. Distributed Situation Awareness. Theory Measurement and Application to Teamwork 2009, Ashgate, Farnham.
27. Salmon P.M., Read G.J.M., Stanton N.A., Lenne M.G. The crash at Kerang: investigating systemic and psychological factors leading to unintentional non-complicane at railway level crossings. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013, 50:1278-1288.
28. Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Jenkins D., Ladva D., Rafferty L., Young M. Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: comparison of measures study. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009, 39:490-500.
29. Sorensen L.J., Stanton N.A. Is SA shared or distributed in team work? An exploratory study in an intelligence analysis task. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2011, 41:677-687.
30. Stanton N.A. Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth. Ergonomics 2013, 10.1080/00140139.2013.772244.
31. Stanton N.A., Baber C., Harris D. Modelling Command and Control. Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork 2008, Ashgate, Aldershot.
32. Stanton N.A., Salomon P.M., Walker G.H., Jenkins D. Genotype and phenotype schemata as models of situation awareness in dynamic command and control teams. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009, 39:480-489.
33. Stanton N.A., Stewart R., Harris D., Houghton R.J., Baber C., McMaster R., Salmon P., Hoyle G., Walker G., Young M., Linsell M., Dymott R., Green D. Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics 2006, 49(12):1288-1311.
34. Stanton N.A., Salmon P.M., Walker G.H., Baber C., Jenkins D. Human Factor Methods. a Practical Guide for Engineering and Design 2005, Ashgate, Aldershot.
35. Stanton N.A., Walker G.H. Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43:1117-1127.
36. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Proecedures and Techniques 1990, Sage, London.
37. Walker G.H., Stanton N.A., Baber C., Wells L., Gibson H., Salmon P., Jenkins D. From ethnography to EAST method: a tractable approach for representing distributed cognition in Air Traffic Control. Ergonomics 2010, 53(2):184-197.
38. Wong W., Sallis P., O'Hare D. Eliciting Information Portrayal Requirements: Experiences with the Critical Decision Method. The Information Science Discussion Paper Series 1997, vol. 97/04:1-16.