What could they have been thinking? how sociotechnical system design influences cognition: A case study of the stockwell shooting

Ergonomics

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 103-119

  Jenkins, Daniel P ^a   Salmon, Paul M ^b   Stanton, Neville A ^c   Walker, Guy H ^d   Rafferty, Laura ^c  

^a Sociotechnic Solutions   (United Kingdom)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accident analysis; Accidents; Cognitive work analysis; Command and control; Decision making; Error; Perception

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS; CHANGING ENVIRONMENT; COGNITIVE WORK ANALYSIS; COMMAND AND CONTROL; CONSTRAINT-BASED; HUMAN FACTORS; PERCEPTION; REAL TIME; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SUICIDE BOMBER;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BOMB; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; POLICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; TERRORISM; THINKING; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING;

ACCIDENTS; BOMBS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; LONDON; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; POLICE; TERRORISM; THINKING; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 79551596625     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.539706     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Artman, H. and Garbis, C., 1998. Situation awareness as distributed cognition. In: T. Green, L. Bannon, C. Warren, and J. Buckley, eds. Cognition and cooperation. Proceedings of 9th conference of cognitive ergonomics. Limerick, Republic of Ireland, 151-156.
2. Bartlett, F.C., 1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Dekker, S.W.A., 2002. Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on human error and performance. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 371-385.
4. Elix, B. and Naikar, N., 2008. Designing safe and effective future systems: a new approach for modelling decisions in future systems with Cognitive Work Analysis. Proceedings of the 8th international symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association.
5. Endsley, M.R., 1989. Final report: Situation awareness in an advanced strategic mission. NOR DOC 89-32. Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corporation.
6. Endsley, M.R., 1995. Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37 (1), 32-64.
7. Endsley, M.R. and Robertson, M.M., 2000. Situation awareness in aircraft maintenance teams. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26 (2), 301-325.
8. Head, H., 1920. Studies in neurology, vol. I. London: Oxford University Press.
9. Hollnagel, E., 1998. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
10. Hollnagel, E., 2001. Extended cognition and the future of ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2 (3), 309-315.
11. Hollnagel, E. and Woods, D.D., 1999. Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51 (1-2), 339-356.
12. Hutchins, E., 1995a. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Hutchins, E., 1995b. How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
14. Independent Police Complaints Commission, 2007. Stockwell One: Investigation into the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell underground station on 22 July 2005. Published by the IPCC on 8 November 2007.
15. Jenkins, D.P., et al., 2010a. A systemic approach to accident analysis: a case study of the Stockwell shooting. Ergonomics, 53 (1), 1-17.
16. Jenkins, D.P., et al., 2010b. Using the decision-ladder to add a formative element to naturalistic decision-making research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26 (2 and 3), 132-146.
17. Klein, G.A., 1989. Recognition-primed decisions. In: W.B. Rouse, ed. Advances in man-machine system research, 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc., 47-92.
18. Klein, G.A., 2008. Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 50 (3), 456-460
19. Langan-Fox, J., Code, S., and Langfield-Smith, K., 2000. Team mental models: techniques, methods, and analytic approaches. Human Factors, 42 (2), 242-271.
20. Leveson, N., 2004. A new accident model. Safety Science, 42, 237-270.
21. Metropolitan Police Authority, 2008. MPA Stockwell scrutiny [online]. Available from: http://www.mpa.gov.uk/downloads/reports/stockwellscrutiny.pdf [Accessed 23 January 2009].
22. Metropolitan Police Service, 2008. Suspected suicide bombers-Operation Kratos [online]. Available from: http://www.met.police.uk/docs/kratos_briefing.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2009].
23. Naikar, N., 2006. Unpublished papers resulting from International Workshop on Intelligent Decision Support Systems: Retrospect and Prospects, 29 August-2 September, 2005, Siena, Italy.
24. Naikar, N. and Pearce, B., 2003. Analysing activity for future systems. Proceedings of the 47th annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1928-1932.
25. Neisser, U., 1976. Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
26. Norman, D.A., 1981. Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88 (1), 1-15.
27. Norman, D., 2002. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books (Perseus).
28. Ottino, J., 2003. Complex systems. AIChE Journal, 49, 292-299.
29. Piaget, J., 1926. The child's conception of the world. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
30. Rasmussen, J., 1974. The human data processor as a system component: Bits and pieces of a model. Report No. Risø-M-1722. Roskilde, Denmark: Danish Atomic Energy Commission.
31. Rasmussen, J., 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science, 217 (2/3), 183-213.
32. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A., and Goodstein, L.P., 1994. Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
33. Rasmussen, J. and Svedung, J., 2000. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society [online]. Karlstad, Sweden: Rä ddningsverket [Swedish Rescue Services Agency]. Available from: www.raddningsverket.se/Shopping/pdf/16252.pdf [Accessed 12 January 2009].
34. Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., and Smith-Jentsch, K.A., 2001. Principles and strategies for team training. In: W. Karwowski, ed. International encyclopaedia of ergonomics and human factors, vol. 2. Louisville, KY: Taylor and Francis, 1296-1298.
35. Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., and Rosen, M.A., 2008. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50 (3), 540-547.
36. Salas, E., et al., 2006. Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Human Factors, 48 (2), 392-412.
37. Salmon, P.M., et al., 2008. Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: a case study in the energy distribution domain. Ergonomics, 51 (3), 367-384.
38. Salmon, P.M., et al., 2009. Distributed situation awareness: advances in theory, measurement and application to teamwork. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
39. Sheridan, T.B., 2008. Risk, human error, and system resilience: fundamental ideas. Human Factors, 50 (3), 418-426.
40. Smith, K. and Hancock, P.A., 1995. Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors, 37, 137-148.
41. Stanton, N.A., et al., 2006. Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics, 49 (12-13), 1288-1311.
42. Stanton, N., et al., 2009. Genotype and phenotype schema and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10 (1), 43-68.
43. Vicente, K.J., 1999. Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Wilson, K.A., et al., 2007. Errors in the heat of battle: taking a closer look at shared cognition breakdowns through teamwork. Human Factors, 49 (2), 243-256.