A SUPER powerful method for genome wide association study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Wang, Qishan ^a   Tian, Feng ^b   Pan, Yuchun ^a   Buckler, Edward S ^c,d   Zhang, Zhiwu ^d,e,f  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c ROBERT W HOLLEY CENTER FOR AGRICULTURE AND HEALTH   (United States)

^d Institute for Genomic Diversity Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^e NORTHEAST AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MARKER; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; SETTLEMENT OF MIXED LINEAR MODEL UNDER PROGRESSIVELY EXCLUSIVE RELATIONSHIP ALGORITHM; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

GENETIC MARKER;

ALGORITHMS; ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84907586937     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107684     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy B.P., Gordon S., Henders AK, et al. (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 42: 565-569.
2. Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury P.J., Acharya CB, Brown PJ, et al. (2009) The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325: 714-718.
3. Pe'er I, de Bakker PI, Maller J, Yelensky R, Altshuler D, et al. (2006) Evaluating and improving power in whole-genome association studies using fixed marker sets. Nat Genet 38: 663-667.
4. Moonesinghe R, Khoury MJ, Janssens A.C. (2007) Most published research findings are false-but a little replication goes a long way. PLoS Med 4: e28.
5. Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. Plos Medicine 2: 696-701.
6. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg N.A., Donnelly P. (2000) Association mapping in structured populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 67: 170-181.
7. Zhang Z, Buckler ES, Casstevens T.M., Bradbury P.J. (2009) Software engineering the mixed model for genome-wide association studies on large samples. Brief Bioinform 10: 664-675.
8. Yu JM, Pressoir G, Briggs W.H., Bi IV, Yamasaki M, et al. (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nature Genetics 38: 203-208.
9. Zhao K, Aranzana MJ, Kim S, Lister C., Shindo C, et al. (2007) An Arabidopsis example of association mapping in structured samples. PLoS Genet 3: e4.
10. Henderson CR (1984) Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
11. Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Cullis B.R. (1995) Average Information REML: An Efficient Algorithm for Variance Parameter Estimation in Linear Mixed ModelsAverage Information REML: An Efficient Algorithm for Variance Parameter Estimation in Linear Mixed Models Biometrics 51: 1440-1450.
12. Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade C.M., Kirby A., Heckerman D, et al. (2008) Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping. Genetics 178: 1709-1723.
13. Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C.Q., Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, et al. (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 42: 355-360.
14. Kang HM, Sul JH, Service S.K., Zaitlen NA, Kong SY, et al. (2010) Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 42: 348-354.
15. Zhou X, Stephens M. (2012) Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet 44: 821-824.
16. Huang X, Wei X, Sang T., Zhao Q, Feng Q, et al (2010) Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet 42: 961-967.
17. Lippert C, Listgarten J, Liu Y., Kadie CM, Davidson RI, et al. (2011) FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat Methods 8: 833-835.
18. Listgarten J, Lippert C, Kadie C.M., Davidson RI, Eskin E, et al. (2012) Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat Methods 9: 525-526.
19. VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91: 4414-4423.
20. Lipka AE, Tian F, Wang Q., Peiffer J, Li M, et al (2012) GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28: 2397-2399.
21. Zhou Z, Sheng X, Zhang Z., Zhao K, Zhu L, et al (2010) Differential Genetic Regulation of Canine Hip Dysplasia and Osteoarthritis. PLoS ONE 5: e13219.
22. Zhang Z, Zhu L, Sandler J., Friedenberg SS, Egelhoff J, et al. (2009) Estimation of heritabilities, genetic correlations, and breeding values of four traits that collectively define hip dysplasia in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 70: 483-492.
23. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon D.E., Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, et al. (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23: 2633-2635.
24. Atwell S, Huang YS, Vilhjalmsson B.J., Willems G., Horton M, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 465: 627-631.
25. Cheng R, Lim JE, Samocha K.E., Sokoloff G., Abney M, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association studies and the problem of relatedness among advanced intercross lines and other highly recombinant populations. Genetics 185: 1033-1044.
26. Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard M.E., Visscher P.M. (2011) GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet 88: 76-82.
27. Zhang Z, Liu JF, Ding X.D., Bijma P., de Koning DJ, et al. (2010) Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values Using a Trait-Specific Marker-Derived Relationship Matrix. PLoS ONE 5.
28. Kang HM, Sul JH, Service S.K., Zaitlen NA, Kong S-y, et al. (2010) Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nature genetics 42: 348-354.
29. Kawai J, Shinagawa A, Shibata K., Yoshino M, Itoh M, et al (2001) Functional annotation of a full-length mouse cDNA collection. Nature 409: 685-690.
30. Diez-Roux G., Banfi S, Sultan M., Geffers L, Anand S, et al (2011) A highresolution anatomical atlas of the transcriptome in the mouse embryo. PLoS Biol 9: e1000582.
31. Kathiresan S, Manning AK, Demissie S, D'Agostino RB, Surti A, et al (2007) A genome-wide association study for blood lipid phenotypes in the Framingham Heart Study. BMC Med Genet 8 Suppl 1: S17.
32. Wright SI (1922) Coefficient of inbreeding and relationship. The American Naturalist 56: 330-338.
33. Henderson CR (1953) Estimation of Variance and Covariance Components. Biometrics 9: 226-252.
34. Bernardo R (2003) Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development. Theor Appl Genet 107: 1252-1256.
35. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. (2002) spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 618-620.
36. Zhang Z, Todhunter RJ, Buckler E.S., Van Vleck LD (2007) Technical note: Use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood. J Anim Sci 85: 881-885.
37. Myles S, Peiffer J, Brown P.J., Ersoz ES, Zhang Z, et al. (2009) Association Mapping: Critical Considerations Shift from Genotyping to Experimental Design. Plant Cell 21: 2194-2202.
38. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard M.E. (2009) Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res 91: 47-60.
39. Pirinen M, Donnelly P, Spencer C.C. (2012) Including known covariates can reduce power to detect genetic effects in case-control studies. Nat Genet 44: 848-851.
40. Yu J, Zhang Z, Zhu C., Tabanao DA, Pressoir G, et al. (2009) Simulation Appraisal of the Adequacy of Number of Background Markers for Relationship Estimation in Association Mapping. Plant Genome 2: 63-77.