Technical note: Use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 881-885

  Zhang, Z ^a   Todhunter, R J ^a   Buckler, E S ^a   Van Vleck, L D ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Breeding value estimation; Multiple trait derivative free restricted maximal likelihood; Quantitative trait locus association study; Variance component estimation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DOG; DOG DISEASE; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; DOGS; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; HIP DYSPLASIA, CANINE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34247225502     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-656     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blott, S., J. J. Kim, S. Moisio, A. Schmidt-Kntzel, A. Cornet, P. Berzi, N. Cambisano, C. Ford, B. Grisart, D. Johnson, L. Karim, P. Simon, R. Snell, R. Spelman, J. Wong, J. Vilkki, M. Georges, F. Farnir, and W. Coppieters. 2003. Molecular dissection of a quantitative trait locus: A phenylalanine-to-tyrosine substitution in the transmembrane domain of the bovine growth hormone receptor is associated with a major effect on milk yield and composition. Genetics 163:253-266.
2. Boldman, K. G., L. A. Kriese, L. D. VanVleck, C. P. Van Tassell, and S. D. Kachman. 1995. A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of programs to obtain estimates of variance and covariance. USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Clay Center, NE. (DRAFT)
3. Bromley, C. M., L. D. Van Vleck, B. E. Johnson, and O. S. Smith. 2000. Estimation of variance components due to line effects from FI performance with and without pedigree relationships among lines. Crop Sci. 40:651-655.
4. Cruden, D. 1949. The computation of inbreeding coefficients for closed populations. J. Hered. 40:248-251.
5. Emik, L. O., and C. E. Terrill. 1949. Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 40:51-55.
6. Ge, W., M. E. Davis, H. C. Hines, K. M. Irvin, and R. C. M. Simmen. 2003. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the growth hormone and growth hormone receptor genes with blood serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration and growth traits in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 81:641-648.
7. Hardy, O. J. 2003. Estimation of pair wise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation by distance processes using dominant genetic markers. Mol. Ecol. 12:1577-1588.
8. Hardy, O. J., and X. Vekemans. 2002. SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyze spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2:618-620.
9. Henderson, C. R. 1975. A rapid method for computing inverse of a relationship matrix. J. Dairy Sci. 58:1727-1730.
10. Henderson, C. R. 1976. A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32:69-83.
11. Kim, N. K., Y. W. Seo, G. H. Kim, J. H. Joh, O. H. Kim, E. R. Chung, and O.S. Lee. 2004. A previously unreported Dral polymorphism within the regulatory region of the bovine growth hormone gene and its association with growth traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle. Anim. Genet. 35:152-154.
12. Loiselle, B., V. Sork, J. Nason, and C. Graham. 1995. Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82:1420-1425.
13. Mateescu, R. G., Z. Zhang, K. L. Tsai, J. Phavaphutanon, N. I. Burton-Wurster, G. Lust, R. L. Quaas, K. E. Murphy, G. M. Acland, and R. J. Todhunter. 2005. Analysis of allele fidelity, polymorphic information content, and density of microsatellites in a genome wide screen for hip dysplasia in a cross-breed pedigree. J. Hered. 96:847-853.
14. Moody, D. E., D. Pomp, M. K. Nielsen, and L. D. Van Vleck. 1999. Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing traits related to energy balance in selection and inbred lines of mice. Genetics 152:699-711.
15. Quaas, R. L. 1976. Computing the diagonal elements and inverse of a large numerator relationship matrix. Biometrics 32:949-953.
16. Riley, D. G., C. C. Chase, Jr., A. C. Hammond, R. L. West, D. D. Johnson, T. A. Olson, and S. W. Coleman. 2002. Estimated genetic parameters for carcass traits of Brahman cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80:955-962.
17. Ritland, K. 1996. Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet. Res. Camb. 67:175-185.
18. Yu, J., G. Pressoir, W. H. Briggs, I. V. Bi, M. Yamasaki, J. F. Doebley, M. D. McMullen, B. S. Gaut, D. M. Nielsen, J. B. Holland, S. Kresovich, and E. S. Buckler. 2006. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38:203-208.
19. Zhang, Z., P. J. Bradbury, D. E. Kroon, T. M. Casstevens, and E. S. Buckler. 2006a. TASSEL 2.0: A software package for association and diversity analyses in plants and animals. Plant and Anim. Genomes XIV Conf. January 14-18, 2006, San Diego, CA. http://www.intl-pag.org/14/abstracts/PAG14_C012.html Accessed Jan. 12, 2007.
20. Zhang, Z., R. G. Mateescu, G. Lust, J. Phavaphutanon, K. Tsai, K. Murphy, R. J. Todhunter, and E. S. Buckler. 2006b. Association mapping accounting for background QTLs: Relationship based on pedigree vs. molecular markers. Proc. 8th World Conf. Genetics Appl. Livest. Prod., Belo Horizonte, Brazil, Aug. 13-18, 2006. CD-ROM communication No. 20-08.