Performance criteria for rapid screening methods to detect mycotoxins

World Mycotoxin Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 439-447

  Von Holst, C ^a   Stroka, J ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

qualitative results; Screening methods; validation guideline

Indexed keywords

MYCOTOXIN;

FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; QUADRUPOLE MASS SPECTROMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCREENING; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 84907543018     PISSN: 18750710     EISSN: 18750796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3920/WMJ2014.1710     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. American Association of Cereal Chemists International (AACCI), 2013. Official methods of analysis. Appendix N: ISPAM guidelines for validation of qualitative binary chemistry methods. Available at: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/appendices.asp.
2. Anfossi, L., Baggiano, C., Giovannoli, C., D'Arco, G. and Giraudi, G., 2013. Lateral-flow immunoassays for mycotoxins and phycotoxins: a review. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 405: 467-480.
3. Anklam, E., Stroka, J. and Boenke, A., 2002. Acceptance of analytical methods for implementation of EU legislation with a focus on mycotoxins. Food Control 13: 173-183.
4. Ellison, S.L.R. and Fearn, T., 2005. Characterising the performance of qualitative analytical methods: statistics and terminology. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 24: 468-476.
5. European Commission (EC), 2002. Commission Regulation (EC) no. 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Official Journal of the European Union L 221: 8-36.
6. European Commission (EC), 2012. Commission Regulation (EC) no. 252/2012 of 21 March 2012 laying down methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of levels of dioxins, dioxin-like PCBs and non-dioxin-like PCBs in certain foodstuffs and repealing Regulation (EC) no. 1883/2006. Official Journal of the European Union L 84: 1-22.
7. Horwitz, W., 1995. Protocol for the design, conduct and interpretation of method performance studies. Pure and Applied Chemistry 67: 331-343.
8. Krska, R., Krska, R. and Molinelli, A., 2009. Rapid test strips for analysis of mycotoxins in food and feed. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 393: 67-71.
9. Lattanzio, V.M.T., Nivarlet, N., Lippolis, V., Della Gatta, S., Huet, A.C., Delahaut, P., Granier, B. and Visconti, A., 2012. Multiplex dipstick immunoassay for semi-quantitative determination of Fusarium mycotoxins in cereals. Analytical Chimica Acta 718: 99-108.
10. Lattanzio, V.M.T., Pascale, M. and Visconti, A., 2009. Current analytical methods for the determination of trichothecene mycotoxins in cereals. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 28: 758-768.
11. Lattanzio, V.M.T., von Holst, C. and Visconti, A., 2013. Experimental design for in-house validation of a screening immunoassay kit. The case of a multiplex dipstick for Fusarium mycotoxins in cereals. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 405: 7773-7782.
12. MacArthur, R., 2013. Validation approaches for quantitative methods used in a binary fashion. Lecture delivered at the 4th MoniQA International Conference. February 26-March 1, 2013. Budapest, Hungary. Available at: http://budapest2013.moniqa.org/webfm-send/33/1.
13. MacArthur, R., MacArthur, R. and von Holst, C., 2012. A protocol for the validation of qualitative methods of detection. Analytical Methods 4: 2744-2754.
14. Maragos, C.M. and Busman, M., 2010. Rapid and advanced tools for mycotoxin analysis: a review. Food Additives and Contaminants Part A 27: 688-700.
15. Trullols, E., Ruisanchez, I. and Rius, F.X., 2004. Validation of qualitative analytical methods. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 23: 137-145.
16. Trullols, E., Ruisanchez, I., Rius, F.X. and Huguet, J., 2005. Validation of qualitative methods of analysis that use control samples. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 24: 516-523.
17. Uhlig, S., Niewoehner, L. and Gowik, P., 2011. Can the usual validation standard series for quantitative methods ISO 5725, be also applied for qualitative methods? Accreditation and Quality Assurance 16: 533-537.
18. Wehling, P., Labudde, R.A., Brunelle, S.L. and Nelson, M.T., 2011. Probability of detection (POD) as a statistical model for the validation of qualitative methods. Journal of AOAC International 94: 335-347.