The inhuman body: When sexual objectification becomes dehumanizing

Humanness and Dehumanization

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 186-204

  Vaes, Jeroen ^a   Loughnan, Steve ^b   Puvia, Elisa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907490449     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203110539     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls: Executive summary. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html
2. Archer, D., Iritani, B., Kimes, D. D., & Barrios, M. (1983). Face-ism: Five studies of sex difference in facial prominence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 725–735. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.45.4.725
3. Austin, J., & Vancouver, J. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338–375. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.120.3.338
4. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power ? sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.68.5.768
5. Bartky, S. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
6. Bernard, P., Gervais, S., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized bodyinversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471.
7. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.100.2.204
8. Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 540–551. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21497
9. Confer, J. C., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). More than just a pretty face: Men’s priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus long-term mating contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 348–353. doi:10.1016/j. evolhumbehav.2010.04.002
10. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. pmid:11994752
11. Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2005). Positive affect as implicit motivator: On the nonconscious operation of behavioural goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 129–142. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.89.2.129
12. Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. Ph., Paladino, M. P., Rodriguez, R. T., Rodriguez, A. P., & Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “non-uniquely” emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71–96. doi:10.1080/02699930244000444
13. Dworkin, A. (2000). Against the male flood: Censorship, pornography, and equality. In D. Cornell (Ed.), readings in feminism: Feminism and pornography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
15. Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 498–541). New York, NY: Wiley.
16. Ferguson, M., & Bargh, J. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557–572. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.87.5.557
17. Fitzsimons, G. M., & Shah, J. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 319–337. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.95.2.319
18. Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Friedman, R. (2008). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 211–233. doi:10.1177/1088868307303029
19. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471–6402.1997.tb00108.x
20. Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2012). When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 499–513. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8309.2010.02016.x
21. Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., Förster, J., Maass, A., & Suitner, C. (2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 743–753. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1890
22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.56.2.109
23. Goldenberg, J. L. (2005). The body stripped down: An existential account of ambivalence toward the physical body. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 224–228. doi:10.1111/j.0963–7214.2005.00369.x
24. Goldenberg, J. L., & Roberts, T. (2004). The beast within the beauty. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of existential experimental social psychology (pp. 71–85). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
25. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegener, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619.doi:10.1126/science.1134475
26. Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207–1220. doi:10.1037/a0025883
27. Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.95.1.111
28. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychological Science, 17, 847–853. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01793.x
29. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
30. Haslam, N. (2007). Humanising medical practice: The role of empathy. Medical Journal of Australia, 187, 381–382. pmid: 17907998
31. Haslam, N., Kashima, Y., Loughnan, S., Shi, J., & Suitner, C. (2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with non-humans in three cultures. Social Cognition, 26, 248–258. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.248
32. Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Kashima, Y., & Bain, P. (2008). Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 55–85. doi:10.1080/10463280801981645
33. Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
34. Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–581. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
35. Kant, I. (1991). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1797)
36. Kaufmann, P. (2011). Instrumentalization: What does it mean to use a person? In P. Kaufmann, H. Kuch, C. Neuhauser, & E. Webster (Eds.), Humiliation, degradation, dehumanization: Human dignity violated (pp. 57–65). New York, NY: Springer.
37. Kozak, M., Frankenhauser, H., & Roberts, T. (2009). Objects of desire: Objectification as a function of male sexual orientation. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10, 225–230. doi:10.1037/a0016257
38. Loughnan, S., Fernandez, S., Vaes, J., Anjum, G., Aziz, M., Harada, C., Tsuchiya, K. (2012). Sexual objectification is common in Western, but not non-Western nations: A seven nation study of sexual objectification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
39. Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717. doi:10.1002/ejsp.755
40. Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E., & Puvia, E. (in press). The impact of objectification on perceptions of rape victim blame and suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly.
41. MacKinnon, C. (1982). Feminisim, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7, 515–544.
42. Marino, P. (2008). The ethics of sexual objectification: Autonomy and consent. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 51, 345–364. doi:10.1080/00201740802166643
43. Marx, K. (1964). Early writings (T. B. Bottomore, Trans.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. (Original work published 1844)
44. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471–6402.2008.00452.x
45. Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. In M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), Objectification (pp. 213–239). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46. Oliver, S. (2011). Dehumanization: Perceiving the body as (in)human. In P. Kaufmann, H. Kuch, C. Neuhauser, & E. Webster (Eds.), Humiliation, degradation, dehumanization: Human dignity violated. (pp. 85–97). New York, NY: Springer.
47. Penton-Voak, I. S., Pound, N., Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 607–640. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607
48. Puvia, E., & Vaes, J. (2013). Being a body: Women’s appearance related self-views and their dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets. Sex Roles, 68, 484–495.
49. Reed, C. L., Stone, V., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302–308. doi:10.1111/1467–9280.14431
50. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Grubb, J. D., & McGoldrick, J. E. (2006). Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 73–87. doi:10.1037/0096–1523.32.1.73
51. Rohlinger, D. A. (2002). Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46, 61–74. doi:10.1023/A:1016575909173
52. Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493–517. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1022
53. Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734–746.
54. Saminaden, A., Loughnan, S., & Haslam, N. (2010). Afterimages of savages: Implicit associations between “primitives,” animals and children. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 91–105. doi:10.1348/014466609X415293
55. Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 512–524. doi:10.1177/0146167205282154
56. Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. doi:10.1007/s11199–005–3737–3
57. Sunstein, C. (1995, January 9). Review of defending pornography. The New Republic, pp. 42–45.
58. Swim, J., Hyers, L., Cohen, L., & Ferguson, M. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022–4537.00200
59. Timmermans, S., & Almeling, R. (2009). Objectification, standardization, and commodification in health care: A conceptual readjustment. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 21–27. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.020
60. Vaes, J., & Latrofa, M. (2012). From ogling to dehumanization: The objectifying gaze. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
61. Vaes, J., Paladino, P., & Puvia, E. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. doi:10.1002/ejsp.824
62. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. doi:10.1037/h0027474