Sheltering behavior and locomotor activity in 11 genetically diverse common inbred mouse strains using home-cage monitoring

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Loos, Maarten ^a,b   Koopmans, Bastijn ^a   Aarts, Emmeke ^b   Maroteaux, Gregoire ^b   Van Der Sluis, Sophie ^b,c   Verhage, M ^b   Smit, August B ^b   Brussaard, A B ^b   Borst, J G ^d   Elgersma, Y ^d   Galjart, N ^d   Van Der Horst, G T ^d   Levelt, C N ^e   Pennartz, C M ^f   Spruijt, B M ^g   De Zeeuw, C I ^d  

^a Sylics (Synaptologics BV)   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^g UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

129S1/SVIMJ MOUSE; A J MOUSE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; C3H/HE MOUSE; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CAST/EIJ MOUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DBA 2 MOUSE; DRUG TARGETING; EFFECT SIZE; FVB/N MOUSE; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HABITUATION; HOME-CAGE ACTIVITY TEST; INBRED MOUSE STRAIN; KINEMATICS; LIGHT DARK CYCLE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NOD/LTJ MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PWK/PHJ MOUSE; SHELTERING BEHAVIOR; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; VIDEORECORDING; WSB/EIJ MOUSE;

EID: 84907486863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108563     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Tecott LH, Nestler EJ (2004) Neurobehavioral assessment in the information age. Nat Neurosci 7: 462-466. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=15114359.
2. Roberts A, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Wang W, McMillan L, Threadgill DW (2007) The polymorphism architecture of mouse genetic resources elucidated using genome-wide resequencing data: implications for QTL discovery and systems genetics. Mamm Genome 18: 473-481. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=17674098.
3. De Visser L, van den Bos R, Kuurman WW, Kas MJ, Spruijt BM (2006) Novel approach to the behavioural characterization of inbred mice: automated home cage observations. Genes Brain Behav 5: 458-466. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=16923150.
4. Jhuang H, Garrote E, Yu X, Khilnani V, Poggio T, et al. (2010) Automated home-cage behavioural phenotyping of mice. Nat Commun 1: 68. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt= Citation&listuids=20842193.
5. Kas MJ, de Mooij-van Malsen JG, de Krom M, van Gassen KL, van Lith HA, et al. (2009) High-resolution genetic mapping of mammalian motor activity levels in mice. Genes Brain Behav 8: 13-22. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=18721260.
6. Krackow S, Vannoni E, Codita A, Mohammed AH, Cirulli F, et al. (2010) Consistent behavioral phenotype differences between inbred mouse strains in the IntelliCage. Genes Brain Behav 9: 722-731. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=20528956.
7. Robinson L, Riedel G (2014) Comparison of automated home-cage monitoring systems: Emphasis on feeding behaviour, activity and spatial learning following pharmacological interventions. J Neurosci Methods. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949557. Accessed 24 July 2014.
8. De Mooij-van Malsen JG, Yu KL, Veldman H, Oppelaar H, van den Berg LH, et al. (2009) Variations in ventral root axon morphology and locomotor behavior components across different inbred strains of mice. Neuroscience 164: 1477-1483. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve& db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=19778584.
9. De Mooij-van Malsen JG, van Lith HA, Laarakker MC, Brandys MK, Oppelaar H, et al. (2013) Cross-species genetics converge to TLL2 for mouse avoidance behavior and human bipolar disorder. Genes Brain Behav 12: 653-657. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db= PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=23777486.
10. Goulding EH, Schenk AK, Juneja P, MacKay AW, Wade JM, et al. (2008) A robust automated system elucidates mouse home cage behavioral structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 20575-20582. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=19106295.
11. Vannoni E, Voikar V, Colacicco G, Sánchez MA, Lipp H-P, et al. (2014) Spontaneous behavior in the social homecage discriminates strains, lesions and mutations in mice. J Neurosci Methods. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/24792526. Accessed 2014 Aug 1.
12. Kramvis I, Mansvelder HD, Loos M, Meredith R (2013) Hyperactivity, perseveration and increased responding during attentional rule acquisition in the Fragile X mouse model. Front Behav Neurosci 7: 172. Available: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=24312033.
13. Moretti P, Bouwknecht JA, Teague R, Paylor R, Zoghbi HY (2005) Abnormalities of social interactions and home-cage behavior in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 14: 205-220. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=15548546.
14. Morton AJ, Wood NI, Hastings MH, Hurelbrink C, Barker RA, et al. (2005) Disintegration of the sleep-wake cycle and circadian timing in Huntington's disease. J Neurosci 25: 157-163. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=15634777.
15. Portal E, Riess O, Nguyen HP (2013) Automated home cage assessment shows behavioral changes in a transgenic mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 17. Behav Brain Res 250: 157-165. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23665119. Accessed 25 July 2014.
16. Faizi M, Bader PL, Tun C, Encarnacion A, Kleschevnikov A, et al. (2011) Comprehensive behavioral phenotyping of Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome: activation of beta1-adrenergic receptor by xamoterol as a potential cognitive enhancer. Neurobiol Dis 43: 397-413. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=21527343.
17. Jyoti A, Plano A, Riedel G, Platt B (2010) EEG, activity, and sleep architecture in a transgenic AbetaPPswe/PSEN1A246E Alzheimer's disease mouse. J Alzheimers Dis 22: 873-887. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=20858963.
18. Benjamini Y, Lipkind D, Horev G, Fonio E, Kafkafi N, et al. (2010) Ten ways to improve the quality of descriptions of whole-animal movement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34: 1351-1365. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=20399806.
19. Maroteaux G, Loos M, van der Sluis S, Koopmans B, Aarts E, et al. (2012) High-throughput phenotyping of avoidance learning in mice discriminates different genotypes and identifies a novel gene. Genes Brain Behav 11: 772-784. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=22846151.
20. Hen I, Sakov A, Kafkafi N, Golani I, Benjamini Y (2004) The dynamics of spatial behavior: how can robust smoothing techniques help? J Neurosci Methods 133: 161-172. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=14757357.
21. Hegmann JP, Possidente B (1981) Estimating genetic correlations from inbred strains. Behav Genet 11: 103-114. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=7271677.
22. Loos M, van der Sluis S, Bochdanovits Z, van Zutphen IJ, Pattij T, et al. (2009) Activity and impulsive action are controlled by different genetic and environmental factors. Genes Brain Behav 8: 817-828. Available: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=19751396.
23. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
24. Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20: 141-151.
25. Spruijt BM, Peters SM, de Heer RC, Pothuizen HHJ, van der Harst JE (2014) Reproducibility and relevance of future behavioral sciences should benefit from a cross fertilization of past recommendations and today's technology: "Back to the future." J Neurosci Methods. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24632384. Accessed 1 August 2014.
26. Fonio E, Benjamini Y, Golani I (2012) Short and long term measures of anxiety exhibit opposite results. PLoS One 7: e48414. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=23119008.
27. Hovatta I, Tennant RS, Helton R, Marr RA, Singer O, et al. (2005) Glyoxalase 1 and glutathione reductase 1 regulate anxiety in mice. Nature 438: 662-666. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt= Citation&listuids=16244648.
28. Lad HV, Liu L, Paya-Cano JL, Parsons MJ, Kember R, et al. (2010) Behavioural battery testing: evaluation and behavioural outcomes in 8 inbred mouse strains. Physiol Behav 99: 301-316. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=19931548.
29. Loos M, Staal J, Schoffelmeer AN, Smit AB, Spijker S, et al. (2010) Inhibitory control and response latency differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in a Go/No-Go and 5-choice serial reaction time task and strain-specific responsivity to amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 214: 216-224. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=20580749.
30. Milner LC, Crabbe JC (2007) Three murine anxiety models: results from multiple inbred strain comparisons. Genes Brain Behav. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=18182070.
31. Van Gaalen MM, Steckler T (2000) Behavioural analysis of four mouse strains in an anxiety test battery. Behav Brain Res 115: 95-106. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=10996412.
32. Nishi A, Ishii A, Takahashi A, Shiroishi T, Koide T (2010) QTL analysis of measures of mouse home-cage activity using B6/MSM consomic strains. Mamm Genome 21: 477-485. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query. fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=20886216.
33. Crabbe JC, Cotnam CJ, Cameron AJ, Schlumbohm JP, Rhodes JS, et al. (2003) Strain differences in three measures of ethanol intoxication in mice: the screen, dowel and grip strength tests. Genes Brain Behav 2: 201-213. Available: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&listuids=12953786.
34. Rustay NR, Wahlsten D, Crabbe JC (2003) Assessment of genetic susceptibility to ethanol intoxication in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2917-2922. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt= Citation&listuids=12584362.