Economic instruments and marine litter control

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 102, Issue PA, 2014, Pages 47-54

  Oosterhuis, Frans ^a   Papyrakis, Elissaios ^a,b,c   Boteler, Benjamin ^d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^d ECOLOGIC INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; FISHERIES; FISHING VESSELS; MARINE INDUSTRY; PLASTIC CONTAINERS; WASTE TREATMENT;

CONSUMER PREFERENCES; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL TAXES; FISHING INDUSTRY; LAND-BASED SOURCES; SOCIO-ECONOMIC EFFECTS; WASTE COLLECTION; WASTE REDUCTION;

COSTS;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX; MARINE POLLUTION; POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE; POLLUTION CONTROL; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT;

EID: 84907467597     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.08.005     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Anstine J. Consumers' willingness to pay for recycled content in plastic kitchen garbage bags: a hedonic price approach. Appl. Econ. Let. 2000, 7:35-39.
2. Batie S.S., Ervin D.E. Transgenic crops and the environment: missing markets and public roles. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2001, 6:435-457.
3. Burns S. Local authorities, funding tourism services and tourist taxes. Loc. Econ. 2010, 25:47-57.
4. Chipman J.S., Tian G. Detrimental externalities, pollution rights and the "Coase theorem". Econ. Theor. 2012, 49:309-327.
5. Cho D.-O. The incentive program for fishermen to collect marine debris in Korea. Mar. Pollut. Bul. 2009, 58:415-417.
6. Common M., Stagl S. Ecological Economics 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. second ed.
7. Convery F., McDonnell S., Ferreira S. The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environ. Res. Econ. 2007, 38:1-11.
8. Cornes R., Sandler T. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. first ed.
9. Cruz I., McLaughlin R. Contrasting marine policies in the United States, Mexico, Cuba and the European Union: searching for an integrated strategy for the Gulf of Mexico region. Oc. Coast. Manag. 2008, 51:826-838.
10. Davison P., Asch R.G. Plastic ingestion by mesopelagic fishes in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2011, 432:173-180.
11. Dikgang J., Leiman A., Visser M. Analysis of the Plastic Bag Levy in South Africa 2010, Policy Paper Number 18, Environmental Policy Research Unit, School of Economics, University of Cape Town.
12. Diop S., Arthurton R., Scheren P., Kitheka J., Koranteng K., Payet R. The coastal and marine environment of Western and Eastern Africa: challenges to sustainable management and socioeconomic development. Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science 2011, 315-335. Waltham Academic Press, London, UK. E. Wolanski, D.S. McLusky (Eds.).
13. do Valle P.O., Pintassilgo P., Matias A., Andre F. Tourist attitudes towards an accommodation tax earmarked for environmental protection: a survey in the Algarve. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33:1408-1416.
14. Dodds R., Graci S.R., Holmes M. Does the tourist care? A comparison of tourists in Koh Phi Phi, Thailand and Gili Trawangan, Indonesia. J. Sust. Tour. 2010, 18:207-222.
15. Ecorys The Role of Market-based Instruments in Achieving a Resource Efficient Economy October 2011, Report for the European Commission, DG Environment, Ecorys, Cambridge Econometrics and COWI, Rotterdam.
16. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:663-674.
17. European Commission Overview of EU Policies, Legislation and Initiatives Related to Marine Litter 2012, Commission Staff Working Document, SWD(2012 365 final), Brussels.
18. EEA Market-based Instruments for Environmental Policy in Europe 2005, Technical Report 8/2005, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
19. EPA The United States Experience with Economic Incentives for Protecting the Environment 2001, Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation Office of the Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
20. Fanshawe T., Everand M. The Impacts of Marine Litter 2002, Marine Pollution Monitoring Group, (Report of the Marine Litter Task Team).
21. Ferrara I., Plourde C. Refillable versus non-refillable containers: the impact of regulatory measures on packaging mix and quality choices. Res. Pol. 2003, 29:1-13.
22. GEF Marine debris as a Global Environmental Problem: Introducing a Solutions Based Framework Focused on Plastic 2011, Report, Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC.
23. Harrington W., Morgenstern R.D. "Economic incentives versus command and control: what's the best approach for solving environmental problems?. Acid in the Environment: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects 2007, 233-240. Springer, New York. G.R. Visgilio, D.M. Whitelaw (Eds.).
24. He H. Effects of environmental policy on consumption: lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation. Environ. Develop. Econ. 2012, 17:407-431.
25. HELCOM Marine Litter in the Baltic Sea Region: Assessment and Priorities for Response 2007, (Report. Helsinki, Finland).
26. Hepburn C.J. Regulating by prices, quantities or both: an update and an overview. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Pol. 2006, 22:226-247.
27. Hill J., Hislop H., Bégin A.-E. Good Product, Bad Product? Making the Case for Product Levies 2008, Green Alliance, London, UK.
28. Hogg D., Sherrington C., Vergunst T. A Comparative Study on Economic Instruments Promoting Waste Prevention 2011, (Final Report to Bruxelles Environnement. Bristol, UK).
29. Kolstad C.D. Environmental Economics 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. third ed.
30. Lanoie P., Laurent-Lucchetti J., Johnstone N., Ambec S. Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the Porter hypothesis. J. Econ. Manag. Strat. 2011, 20:803-842.
31. Lavee D. A cost-benefit analysis of a deposit-refund program for beverage containers in Israel. Waste Manag. 2010, 30:338-345.
32. Mazzanti M., Zoboli R. Economic instruments and induced innovation: the European policies on end-of-life vehicles. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 58:318-337.
33. McIlgorm A., Campbell H.F., Rule M.J. Understanding the Economic Benefits and Costs of Controlling Marine Debris in the APEC Region 2009, (Report commissioned for the APEC Secretariat and the United Nations Environment Programme).
34. McIlgorm A., Campbell H.F., Rule M.J. The economic cost and control of marine debris damage in the Asia-Pacific region. Oc. Coast. Manag. 2011, 54:643-651.
35. Morrissey O., te Velde D., Hewitt A. Defining International Public Goods: Conceptual Issues. International Public Goods: Incentives, Measurement, and Financing 2002, 31-46. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. M. Ferroni, A. Mody (Eds.).
36. Mouat J., Lozano R.L., Bateson H. Economic Impacts of Marine Litter 2010, Report, KIMO, Lerwick, UK.
37. Murray F., Cowie P. Plastic contamination in the decapod crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. Mar. Pollut. Bul. 2011, 62:1207-1217.
38. Nahman A. Extended producer responsibility for packaging waste in South Africa: current approaches and lessons learned. Resour. Conserv. Rec. 2010, 54:155-162.
39. Numata D., Managi S. Demand for refilled reusable products. Environ. Econ. Polic. Stud. 2012, 14:421-436.
40. Ochiewo J., Rasolofojaona H., Seewoobaduth J., Pereira M., Gonzalves C., Ryan P., Lukambusi L. Regional Overview and Assessment of Marine Litter Related Activities in the West Indian Ocean Region 2007, (WIOMSA Report to the United Nations Environment Programme).
41. OECD Impacts of Unit-based Waste Collection Charges 2006, ENV/EPOC/WGWPR(200510/FINAL), 15 May 2006, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
42. OECD Environmental liability for damage to natural resources in OECD countries: the concept and key approaches. Task Force for the Implementation of the Environmental Action Programme for Central and Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia.10-12 June 2009, Chisinau, Moldova 2009, Discussion paper, ENV/EPOC/EAP/REPIN(2009)1.
43. Öko-Institut Study on Land-sourced Litter (LSL) in the Marine Environment: Review of Sources and Literature 2012, Report, Öko-Institut, Freiburg, Germany.
44. Oosterhuis F.H., Bartelings H., Linderhof V.G.M., van Beukering P.J.H. Economic Instruments and Waste Policies in the Netherlands. Inventory and Options for Extended Use 2009, IVM report (R-09/01), Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
45. OSPAR OSPAR Pilot Project on Monitoring Marine Beach Litter: Monitoring of Marine Litter on Beaches in the OSPAR Region 2007, Report, OSPAR Commission, London, UK.
46. OSPAR Marine litter in the North-East Atlantic Region: Assessment and Priorities for Response 2009, Report, OSPAR Commission, London, UK.
47. RPA Feasibility Study of Introducing Instruments to Prevent Littering 2013, Final Report for DG Environment, Risk & Policy Analysts Limited, Arcadis and ABPmer, London, UK.
48. Schneider J.E., Peterson N.A., Kiss N., Ebeid O., Doyle A.S. Tobacco litter costs and public policy: a framework and methodology for considering the use of fees to offset abatement costs. Tobac. Contr 2011, 20:36-41.
49. Schubert S.F. Coping with Externalities in Tourism: a Dynamic Optimal Taxation Approach 2009, MPRA Paper No 16736, University of Munich.
50. Sterner T. Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management 2003, Report, Resources for the future, Washington DC.
51. Ten Brink P., Lutchman I., Bassi S., Speck S., Sheavly S., Register K., Woolaway C. Guidelines on the Use of Market-based Instruments to Address the Problem of Marine Litter 2009, Institute for European Environmental policy (IEEP), Brussels, Belgium.
52. Thompson R.C., Moore C.J., vom Saal F.S., Swan S. Plastics, the environment and human health. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2009, 364:2153-2166.
53. UNEP Marine litter: a Global Challenge 2009, Report, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.
54. Walls M. Deposit-refund Systems in Practice and Theory 2011, Discussion Paper 11-47, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
55. Williams C. Combating marine pollution from land-based activities: Australian initiatives. Oc. Coast. Manag. 1996, 33:87-112.