Economic incentives versus command and control: What's the best approach for solving environmental problems?

Acid in the Environment: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 233-240

  Harrington, Winston ^a   Morgenstern, Richard D ^a  

^a Resources for the Future in the Quality of the Environment Division   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862489026     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-37562-5_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. 2 emission trading program: Cost savings without allowance trades. Contemporary Economic Policy, 14 (April), 79-94.
2. Davies, J.C. and Mazurek, J. (1998). Pollution Control in the United States. Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.
3. Harrington, Winston, Morgenstern, Richard D. and Nelson, P. (2000). On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2), 297-322.
4. Harrington, Winston, Morgenstern, Richard, D. and Sterner, Thomas. (Eds.). (2004). Choosing Environmental Policy Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe. Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.
5. Hahn, Robert and Hester, G. (1989). Where did all the markets go? An analysis of EPA's emissions trading program. Yale Journal of Regulation, 6(1), 109-153.
6. Sterner, Thomas. (2002). Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Policy Instruments. Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.
7. Tietenberg, Thomas H. (2006). Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy. Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2001). The United States Experience with Economic Incentives for Protecting the Environment. EPA: Washington, DC.